30.01.2015 Views

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

80 CHARACTERIZATION OF GEOLOGIC SEQUESTRATION OPPORTUNITIES IN THE <strong>MRCSP</strong> REGION<br />

structures are absent or have had little or no effect on the interval.<br />

The shales, particularly the very argillaceous and organic-rich<br />

shales of the Maquoketa, Clays Ferry, Utica, and Point Pleasant<br />

formations, should provide excellent sealing capability. Like the<br />

Upper Devonian organic-rich shales, they probably have low matrix<br />

porosities and permeabilities, even in fractured zones that would<br />

provide effective seals for sequestration targets in lower strata. Although<br />

the formation is characterized as fractured, joints within the<br />

Maquoketa have collapsed due to the fissile nature of the shale, and<br />

where present, the low hydraulic conductivity of the rock inhibits<br />

fluid flow. In fact, it has been referred to as the Maquoketa Confining<br />

Unit in regional aquifer studies (McGarry, 1996). It is highly<br />

likely the same attributes will be found within the other Upper Ordovician<br />

shales as well.<br />

Lack of measured physical parameters for these strata in areas<br />

not known to produce oil or gas will be a problem in evaluating the<br />

rocks for sealing potential. A considerable amount of research will<br />

be necessary to determine these parameters prior to initiating any<br />

injection projects.<br />

Potential Injection Targets<br />

There are at least four targets for sequestration potential in the<br />

Knox to Lower Silurian Unconformity Interval: 1) fractured or<br />

coarse-grained bioclastic carbonates; 2) enhanced gas recovery in<br />

thick organic-rich black shales of the Utica/Point Pleasant; 3) fractured<br />

Bald Eagle and Oswego sandstones and conglomerates; and 4)<br />

possible fractured or diagenetically altered Juniata sandstones.<br />

Ordovician Carbonates—According to Sullivan (1983) and Nuttall<br />

(1996), stratigraphic traps occur in the upper part of the Lexington<br />

Limestone in Kentucky, sealed by fine-grained, impermeable<br />

strata and tightly cemented grainstones. Net pay thickness averages<br />

10 feet, and average matrix porosity is 11.8 percent with a maximum<br />

porosity of 15 percent. Moldic, interparticular, intraparticular, and<br />

intercrystalline porosity types dominate. Nuttall (1996) reported<br />

that a core from Clinton County, Kentucky had an average reservoir<br />

permeability of 57.1 millidarcies (md) and a maximum permeability<br />

of 293 md. In this particular area of Kentucky, the Ordovician carbonates<br />

are too shallow for effective sequestration (less than 2,500<br />

feet), but similar reservoir zones in the Trenton Limestone in deeper<br />

parts of the Michigan and Appalachian basins could ultimately be<br />

useful for sequestration. This is especially true in areas where porosity<br />

and permeability occur as a result of fracturing. Production<br />

from fractured Black River/High Bridge and Trenton/Lexington<br />

reservoirs in central Kentucky and West Virginia appears to be from<br />

open, unmineralized fractures, probably related to reactivation of<br />

deep-seated faults, although Hamilton-Smith and others (1990)<br />

acknowledge that minor secondary mineralization might help keep<br />

the fractures open. Dolomitized fracture zones and grainstone facies<br />

account for much of the upper Black River/High Bridge and<br />

Trenton/Lexington production in southeastern Michigan, Kentucky,<br />

central Ohio, south-central Ontario, north-central Pennsylvania, and<br />

south-central New York. In areas affected by large fault systems<br />

with sizeable gouge zones, fluids interacted with the gouge to create<br />

thick zones of mineralization and vugular porosity within the zones,<br />

whereas smaller fault systems are more likely to have good intercrystalline<br />

porosity development (Wickstrom, 1996).<br />

Utica Shale and Point Pleasant Formation—Both the Utica and<br />

Point Pleasant consist of dark gray to black, organic-rich shales,<br />

with the Point Pleasant also containing interbedded Trenton-type<br />

limestones. Many authors (for example, see Cole and others, 1987;<br />

Wallace and Roen, 1989; Ryder and others, 1991; Wickstrom, 1996)<br />

consider the Utica/Point Pleasant interval to be the source rocks for<br />

the hydrocarbons found in the underlying Trenton and Black River<br />

carbonates, as well as many of the overlying units (Bald Eagle, Medina,<br />

Tuscarora, Lockport, etc.). The Utica /Point Pleasant interval<br />

is more than 700 feet thick in parts of central Pennsylvania, but thins<br />

to the northwest until it is only about 100 feet thick in northwestern<br />

Ohio (Wickstrom, 1996). Because of their thickness and depth below<br />

2,500 feet in much of the Michigan and Appalachian basins, the<br />

Utica/Point Pleasant shales could have potential for sequestration<br />

through enhanced shale gas recovery. Gas content probably varies<br />

regionally with changes in thickness, pressure, organic carbon content,<br />

and thermal maturity, as in the Upper Devonian black shales<br />

of Appalachian and Michigan basins (Boswell, 1996). The interval<br />

does not have a history of gas production (although strong shows<br />

through the interval are regularly noted), so it would require substantial<br />

research to determine how effective the shales would be to<br />

both sequestration and gas production.<br />

Bald Eagle and Oswego Formations—The Bald Eagle Formation,<br />

where it produces natural gas in north-central Pennsylvania<br />

at depths of 12,900 to 13,272 feet, is a naturally fractured reservoir<br />

in which the fractures are vertical to subvertical and run parallel to<br />

structural axes (Laughrey and Harper, 1996). There is no known<br />

production from the Oswego Sandstone in the <strong>MRCSP</strong> study area,<br />

but owing to lithologic similarities with the Bald Eagle, it probably<br />

would also serve as a producing reservoir and potential sequestration<br />

target in zones of intense fracturing. The sandstones from the<br />

pay interval consist of moderately sorted to well sorted, fine- to<br />

medium-grained, lithic arenites. Monocrystalline quartz and chert<br />

dominate composition, but detrital and authigenic feldspars, some<br />

altered to chlorites and mixed-layer illite-smectite, mica, low-grade<br />

metamorphic rock fragments, and trace amounts of homblende and<br />

pyrite also occur. Dolomite, with some minor calcite, comprise the<br />

principal cement in the matrix, but they also contain minor authigenic<br />

quartz cement (Laughrey and Harper, 1996). The sandstone<br />

matrix has relatively low porosity and permeability, which contributes<br />

to the seal. In addition, syntectonically precipitated minerals,<br />

such as quartz, hematite, and calcite, often partially fill the fractures.<br />

Upward-decreasing grain size, increasing clay content, and shale<br />

beds in the overlying Juniata Formation might assist in sealing the<br />

reservoir (Laughrey and Harper, 1996). Porosity and permeability<br />

are extremely variable—fracture zones have porosities as high as<br />

30 percent, whereas matrix porosities tend to be only two to eight<br />

percent and matrix permeability was calculated at 0.07 md in the<br />

reservoir, with all of the production coming from fracture permeability<br />

(Laughrey and Harper, 1996)<br />

Juniata Formation—Although Laughrey and Harper (1996)<br />

consider the shales and fine-grained sandstones of the Juniata Formation<br />

to contribute to the seal for Bald Eagle/Oswego reservoirs,<br />

there is some potential for Juniata sandstones to act as sequestration<br />

targets. This apparent discrepancy in interpretation is the result of<br />

confusion of terminology. As Thompson (1970, 1999) has shown,<br />

the Bald Eagle/Oswego and Juniata are artificial lithologic constructs<br />

based on color differences—the Bald Eagle/Oswego is gray,<br />

and the Juniata is red. Inasmuch as the color boundary between the<br />

two formations varies by up to 656 feet within the Upper Ordovician<br />

clastic lithofacies, Thompson (1970) recommended that the lithofacies<br />

were far more consistent and meaningful than the formation<br />

names. Thompson (1970, p. 1256, 1257) described lithofacies D<br />

(Figure A5-3) as “unfossiliferous, cross-bedded medium- to coarsegrained<br />

sandstone and conglomerate, with essentially no siltstone or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!