30.01.2015 Views

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

126 CHARACTERIZATION OF GEOLOGIC SEQUESTRATION OPPORTUNITIES IN THE <strong>MRCSP</strong> REGION<br />

15. PENNSYLVANIAN COAL BEDS IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN<br />

Coal beds of late Carboniferous-age occur in the Appalachian<br />

basin portion of the <strong>MRCSP</strong> study area. The Appalachian basin,<br />

one of the largest Pennsylvanian-age coal-producing regions in the<br />

world, currently contains the second, third, and fourth leading coalproducing<br />

states in the United States—West Virginia, Kentucky,<br />

and Pennsylvania, respectively (EIA, 2005). The greater northern<br />

Appalachian basin contains a series of smaller, anthracite-bearing<br />

synclinal basins in eastern Pennsylvania, but these areas are not<br />

included in this report.<br />

STRATIGRAPHY<br />

Coal beds considered potential targets for geologic CO 2 sequestration<br />

occur in the Pennsylvanian Subsystem of the Appalachian<br />

basin and range from early to late Pennsylvanian in age (Figure 5).<br />

Within the <strong>MRCSP</strong> study area, portions of two sub-basins or depocenters<br />

of Pennsylvanian-age occur, the northern Appalachian and<br />

central Appalachian basins (Figure A15-1). The boundary between<br />

these two sub-basins is approximately the southern limit of the outcrop<br />

belt of the Conemaugh Group (Figure 5; see also Figure A15-1)<br />

preserved in the Appalachian basin; this boundary also delineates<br />

the division between the northern and southern coal fields of West<br />

Virginia. Regional lithologic variations between the northern and<br />

central Appalachian basins result in a variety of stratigraphic terms<br />

applied within individual states of the partnership in order to divide<br />

and define this large stratigraphic interval.<br />

Pennsylvanian-age rocks in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and<br />

the northern coal fields of West Virginia are divided, in ascending<br />

stratigraphic order, into the Pottsville, Allegheny, Conemaugh, and<br />

Monongahela Groups (Figure 5). In the southern coal field of West<br />

Virginia, changes in lithologic attributes and preservation of thicker<br />

Lower and Middle Pennsylvanian strata result in the introduction of<br />

the terms Pocahontas, New River, and Kanawha Formations. The<br />

Kanawha and the upper part of the New River Formations are considered<br />

lateral equivalents to the Pottsville Group. The lower part of<br />

the New River and all of the Pocahontas are restricted to the southern<br />

coal fields of West Virginia; also, the Pocahontas Formation is<br />

older than, and does not correlate to, any known Pennsylvanian-age<br />

rocks in other <strong>MRCSP</strong> states in the Appalachian basin.<br />

In Kentucky, the stratigraphic interval equivalent to the Pottsville<br />

and Allegheny Groups and the New River and Kanawha Formations<br />

is known as the Breathitt Group. Chesnut (1992) proposed<br />

a regional stratigraphic nomenclature for the central Appalachian<br />

basin that divides the Breathitt Group into eight coal-bearing and<br />

four quartzose-sandstone dominated formations; however, to date,<br />

this nomenclature has been formalized only in Kentucky.<br />

The Pennsylvanian- and Permian-age Dunkard Group, a unit<br />

containing a few mostly thin coals of limited extent, overlies the<br />

Monongahela Group in portions of Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West<br />

Virginia. However, this unit lacks coal beds of adequate thickness<br />

and/or depths for CO 2 sequestration consideration.<br />

ORIGIN OF NAMES, TYPE SECTIONS,<br />

SIGNIFICANT STUDIES<br />

Rice and others (1994) summarize much of the stratigraphic nomenclature<br />

used for coal-bearing rocks in the study area. Type or<br />

reference sections are located where each unit was named.<br />

Pottsville Group—Named for exposures at Pottsville Gap, Pennsylvania.<br />

Allegheny Group—Named for exposures in the Allegheny River<br />

valley of Pennsylvania.<br />

Conemaugh Group—Named for exposures along the Conemaugh<br />

River, Pennsylvania.<br />

Monongahela Group—Named for exposures along the Monongahela<br />

River, Pennsylvania.<br />

Breathitt Group—Named for exposures in Breathitt County, Kentucky.<br />

Kanawha Formation—Named for exposures along the Kanawha<br />

River, West Virginia.<br />

New River Formation—Named for exposures in New River Gorge,<br />

West Virginia.<br />

Pocahontas Formation—Named for exposures at Pocahontas, Virginia.<br />

<strong>Geologic</strong> investigations of Pennsylvanian-age rocks have occurred<br />

in the Appalachian basin since the 1830s. By the late 19 th<br />

century, the economic significance of the coals in this interval stimulated<br />

a wide array of regional and local studies on the economics,<br />

stratigraphy, depositional history, and various other geologic disciplines<br />

that continues today. Hence, a multitude of investigations on<br />

specific attributes of Pennsylvanian-age rocks, as well as regional<br />

summaries within each <strong>MRCSP</strong> state, have been presented in federal<br />

and state geological survey publications. Moreover, numerous<br />

special papers, field trip guidebooks, trade journal articles, and miscellaneous<br />

reports by various geological societies, organizations,<br />

and academia have, over the past 50 years or so, been published on<br />

the region. A few notable examples of these types of publications include<br />

U.S. <strong>Geologic</strong>al Survey Professional Papers 853 (McKee and<br />

Crosby, 1975) and 1110-A-L (for example, see Collins, 1979), West<br />

Virginia <strong>Geologic</strong>al Survey Volume 22 (Cross and Schemel, 1956),<br />

Kentucky <strong>Geologic</strong>al Survey Series XI Bulletin 3 (Chesnut, 1992),<br />

a collection of papers by the Carolina Coal Group (Ferm and Horne,<br />

1979), and numerous regional guidebooks prepared for the meetings<br />

of the 9 th International Congress of Carboniferous Stratigraphy and<br />

Geology, the 28 th International <strong>Geologic</strong>al Congress, and the 1961,<br />

1981, and 1992 <strong>Geologic</strong>al Society of America national meetings.<br />

Additional references on the specific geologic framework within<br />

each <strong>MRCSP</strong> state can be obtained from the geological surveys of<br />

individual partnership states.<br />

Thickness and chemical data on specific coal beds are available<br />

through the National Coal Resource Database system (NCRDS) of<br />

the U.S. <strong>Geologic</strong>al Survey or from each state geological survey.<br />

The U.S. <strong>Geologic</strong>al Survey also has published a series of regional<br />

coal maps and databases for several of the economically significant<br />

coal beds in the region (Appalachian Basin Resource Assessment<br />

Team, 2002). In addition, maps of most known, abandoned, underground<br />

coal-mines are available from either federal or state agencies<br />

for several of the partnership states.<br />

NATURE OF LOWER AND UPPER CONTACTS<br />

A significant geologic disconformity occurs in the Appalachian<br />

basin between the top of the Mississippian Subsystem and the base<br />

of the Pennsylvanian Subsystem in all but southern West Virginia;<br />

there, continuous deposition occurred and Mississippian rocks

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!