The-Truth-About-Pet-Foods
The-Truth-About-Pet-Foods
The-Truth-About-Pet-Foods
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and exercise does it get What is the source of its water What is the<br />
quality of the air it breathes What are its social interactions What<br />
specific genetic strengths and weaknesses does it have Are its foods<br />
heated, exposed to oxygen and light What about the interactions between<br />
the food ingredients when they are heated<br />
<strong>The</strong>se considerations are all important, just like “breed,” in determining<br />
nutrient needs. Breed-specific logic is just another version of the flawed<br />
reasoning of the pet food industry – that nutritionists can create 100%<br />
perfect foods because they “know” how many IU’s of vitamin D (etc.) an<br />
animal needs. Such fabricated diets based on scientific requirements (only<br />
valid until the scientific board meets the next time) have caused immeasurable<br />
disease and suffering for companion animals.<br />
<strong>The</strong> following is a response to letters directly to Wysong from Company<br />
D:<br />
Company D: Any pet food containing vitamin C is guilty of making<br />
their food toxic. <strong>Pet</strong> food manufacturers use a synthetic<br />
coal tar derivative of vitamin C which is different molecularly<br />
from natural vitamin C. Synthetic vitamin C is in the D<br />
(toxic) form. Synthetic vitamin C is closer to ascorbyl palmitate.<br />
<strong>Truth</strong> Response: Vitamin C is not a synthetic “coal tar derivative.”<br />
Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) is synthesized from sugars such as dextrose. If<br />
basic biochemistry is not understood, why should animal owners believe<br />
infallibility when it comes to creating food recipes for them<br />
Natural vitamin C is different from the synthetic form not because it is<br />
a “coal tar derivative,” as you assert, but because of its complex interrelationships<br />
with other biochemicals. Synthetic vitamin C is not molecularly<br />
“different” than the molecule of isolated natural vitamin C. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
are biochemically indistinguishable. 1<br />
<strong>The</strong> stereochemistry of vitamin C (whether it is D- or L- form) is not<br />
relevant, since manufacturers produce and sell only the L-form. 2<br />
1. Stryer L, Biochemistry, 1995. Nelson DL et al, Lehninger Principles of<br />
Biochemistry, Third Edition, 2000. Tolbert et al, Ascorbic Acid: Chemistry,<br />
Metabolism, and Uses, 1982. Davies MB, Vitamin C: Its Chemistry and<br />
Biochemistry, 1991. Haworth WN, “<strong>The</strong> Structure of Carbohydrates and of<br />
Vitamin C,” 1937; Nobel Lecture.<br />
2. F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, “Roche Vitamins: Vitamin C in Human Nutrition,”<br />
2000.<br />
PAGE 191