11.02.2015 Views

The-Truth-About-Pet-Foods

The-Truth-About-Pet-Foods

The-Truth-About-Pet-Foods

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and exercise does it get What is the source of its water What is the<br />

quality of the air it breathes What are its social interactions What<br />

specific genetic strengths and weaknesses does it have Are its foods<br />

heated, exposed to oxygen and light What about the interactions between<br />

the food ingredients when they are heated<br />

<strong>The</strong>se considerations are all important, just like “breed,” in determining<br />

nutrient needs. Breed-specific logic is just another version of the flawed<br />

reasoning of the pet food industry – that nutritionists can create 100%<br />

perfect foods because they “know” how many IU’s of vitamin D (etc.) an<br />

animal needs. Such fabricated diets based on scientific requirements (only<br />

valid until the scientific board meets the next time) have caused immeasurable<br />

disease and suffering for companion animals.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following is a response to letters directly to Wysong from Company<br />

D:<br />

Company D: Any pet food containing vitamin C is guilty of making<br />

their food toxic. <strong>Pet</strong> food manufacturers use a synthetic<br />

coal tar derivative of vitamin C which is different molecularly<br />

from natural vitamin C. Synthetic vitamin C is in the D<br />

(toxic) form. Synthetic vitamin C is closer to ascorbyl palmitate.<br />

<strong>Truth</strong> Response: Vitamin C is not a synthetic “coal tar derivative.”<br />

Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) is synthesized from sugars such as dextrose. If<br />

basic biochemistry is not understood, why should animal owners believe<br />

infallibility when it comes to creating food recipes for them<br />

Natural vitamin C is different from the synthetic form not because it is<br />

a “coal tar derivative,” as you assert, but because of its complex interrelationships<br />

with other biochemicals. Synthetic vitamin C is not molecularly<br />

“different” than the molecule of isolated natural vitamin C. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

are biochemically indistinguishable. 1<br />

<strong>The</strong> stereochemistry of vitamin C (whether it is D- or L- form) is not<br />

relevant, since manufacturers produce and sell only the L-form. 2<br />

1. Stryer L, Biochemistry, 1995. Nelson DL et al, Lehninger Principles of<br />

Biochemistry, Third Edition, 2000. Tolbert et al, Ascorbic Acid: Chemistry,<br />

Metabolism, and Uses, 1982. Davies MB, Vitamin C: Its Chemistry and<br />

Biochemistry, 1991. Haworth WN, “<strong>The</strong> Structure of Carbohydrates and of<br />

Vitamin C,” 1937; Nobel Lecture.<br />

2. F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, “Roche Vitamins: Vitamin C in Human Nutrition,”<br />

2000.<br />

PAGE 191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!