The-Truth-About-Pet-Foods
The-Truth-About-Pet-Foods
The-Truth-About-Pet-Foods
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• What is the informational and scientific quality of their<br />
educational/marketing materials<br />
• Are they manufacturing it or having it made at a toll producer<br />
• Do they seem principled, or merely profit oriented<br />
... All the other things you will learn in this book about how to<br />
evaluate foods.<br />
Epilogue: Now for a bit of a confession. I am at least in part responsible<br />
for some of the above insanity. Many years ago when I first thought<br />
there was a need to develop alternative pet foods, most products were<br />
the same. <strong>The</strong> game was mostly percentage protein, digestibility and, of<br />
course, palatability. Ingredients didn’t matter much if these objectives<br />
were achieved. My view was that ingredients did matter. Whole wheat<br />
was better than white flour, whole chicken was better than just heads and<br />
feet, and so forth, as you will learn throughout this book. I also discovered<br />
that there was significant science behind – and health benefits to –<br />
certain ingredients that could be used in micro amounts, such as probiotics,<br />
enzymes, phytonutrients, antioxidants and the like.<br />
Partly because we were moderately successful in the market (to the<br />
degree we could educate and overturn deeply ingrained bias, tough job),<br />
and partly because other manufacturers (the big billion dollar guys saw us<br />
as a mere ripple in their tidal wave of financial success) could not defend<br />
well their inferior ingredients, some became concerned, not wanting to<br />
lose face. Others saw opportunity. <strong>The</strong> big guys eventually adopted some<br />
of our innovations, and some profiteers would start whole new lines, often<br />
shamelessly copying our products and adding a few exotics to be “different”<br />
and “better.”<br />
“Why not make exotic ingredient labels playing to increasing human<br />
concerns about nutrition and capture an emerging health conscious market”<br />
they thought. What was lost in this singular quest for profit, however,<br />
was an underlying commitment to good science and health. <strong>The</strong><br />
result: exotic ingredient labels with no true underlying scientific documentation<br />
or meaningful impact on health. Just words on yet more of an endless<br />
line of “100% complete” labels chasing markets. I had helped create<br />
a monster.<br />
Sorry.<br />
PAGE 35