16.11.2012 Views

Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy: An Introduction to TEM ...

Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy: An Introduction to TEM ...

Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy: An Introduction to TEM ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Electron</strong> Optics 47<br />

procedure that is permissible in both light and electron optics, resulting in<br />

Fig. 2-12b. By adding extra dashed rays as shown, Fig. 2-12b illustrates how<br />

electrons emitted from two points a distance 2rs apart are focused in<strong>to</strong> two<br />

magnified disks <strong>of</strong> confusion in the image (shown on the left) <strong>of</strong> radius Mrs<br />

and separation 2Mrs. Although these disks <strong>to</strong>uch at their periphery, the<br />

image would still be recognizable as representing two separate point-like<br />

objects in the specimen. If the separation between the object points is now<br />

reduced <strong>to</strong> rs, the disks overlap substantially, as in Fig. 2-12c. For a further<br />

reduction in spacing, the two separate point objects would no longer be<br />

distinguishable from the image, and so we take rs as the spherical-aberration<br />

limit <strong>to</strong> the point resolution <strong>of</strong> a <strong>TEM</strong> objective lens. This approximates <strong>to</strong><br />

the Rayleigh criterion (Section 1.1); the current-density distribution in the<br />

image consists <strong>of</strong> two overlapping peaks with about 15% dip between them.<br />

Spherical aberration occurs in <strong>TEM</strong> lenses after the objective but is much<br />

less important. This situation arises from the fact that each lens reduces the<br />

maximum angle <strong>of</strong> electrons (relative <strong>to</strong> the optic axis) by a fac<strong>to</strong>r equal <strong>to</strong><br />

its magnification (as illustrated in Fig 2.12b), while the spherical-aberration<br />

blurring depends on the third power <strong>of</strong> this angle, according <strong>to</strong> Eq. (2.14).<br />

2Mr s<br />

Mr s<br />

G<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

���<br />

u<br />

M ~ f/u > 1<br />

Figure 2-12. (a) Ray diagram similar <strong>to</strong> Fig. 2-11, with the object distance u large but finite.<br />

(b) Equivalent diagram with the rays reversed, showing two image disks <strong>of</strong> confusion arising<br />

from object points whose separation is 2rs. (c) Same diagram but with object-point separation<br />

reduced <strong>to</strong> r s so that the two points are barely resolved in the image (Rayleigh criterion).<br />

�<br />

�<br />

2r s<br />

2r s<br />

r s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!