Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy: An Introduction to TEM ...
Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy: An Introduction to TEM ...
Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy: An Introduction to TEM ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Electron</strong> Optics 47<br />
procedure that is permissible in both light and electron optics, resulting in<br />
Fig. 2-12b. By adding extra dashed rays as shown, Fig. 2-12b illustrates how<br />
electrons emitted from two points a distance 2rs apart are focused in<strong>to</strong> two<br />
magnified disks <strong>of</strong> confusion in the image (shown on the left) <strong>of</strong> radius Mrs<br />
and separation 2Mrs. Although these disks <strong>to</strong>uch at their periphery, the<br />
image would still be recognizable as representing two separate point-like<br />
objects in the specimen. If the separation between the object points is now<br />
reduced <strong>to</strong> rs, the disks overlap substantially, as in Fig. 2-12c. For a further<br />
reduction in spacing, the two separate point objects would no longer be<br />
distinguishable from the image, and so we take rs as the spherical-aberration<br />
limit <strong>to</strong> the point resolution <strong>of</strong> a <strong>TEM</strong> objective lens. This approximates <strong>to</strong><br />
the Rayleigh criterion (Section 1.1); the current-density distribution in the<br />
image consists <strong>of</strong> two overlapping peaks with about 15% dip between them.<br />
Spherical aberration occurs in <strong>TEM</strong> lenses after the objective but is much<br />
less important. This situation arises from the fact that each lens reduces the<br />
maximum angle <strong>of</strong> electrons (relative <strong>to</strong> the optic axis) by a fac<strong>to</strong>r equal <strong>to</strong><br />
its magnification (as illustrated in Fig 2.12b), while the spherical-aberration<br />
blurring depends on the third power <strong>of</strong> this angle, according <strong>to</strong> Eq. (2.14).<br />
2Mr s<br />
Mr s<br />
G<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
(c)<br />
���<br />
u<br />
M ~ f/u > 1<br />
Figure 2-12. (a) Ray diagram similar <strong>to</strong> Fig. 2-11, with the object distance u large but finite.<br />
(b) Equivalent diagram with the rays reversed, showing two image disks <strong>of</strong> confusion arising<br />
from object points whose separation is 2rs. (c) Same diagram but with object-point separation<br />
reduced <strong>to</strong> r s so that the two points are barely resolved in the image (Rayleigh criterion).<br />
�<br />
�<br />
2r s<br />
2r s<br />
r s