10.07.2015 Views

Work and Leisure

Work and Leisure

Work and Leisure

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

vehemence <strong>and</strong> wide visibility of the current “running-out-of-time” argumentmay relate to the specific life-circumstances of the writers on this subject<strong>and</strong> perhaps to some degree to their readers’. Implicit in Gershuny’sobservation is yet another concern, namely that respondents’ greater willingnessto report high levels of time pressure is a result of an ‘echo-chambereffect’. In an environment where misrepresented research findings are citedrepeatedly, they ‘start to carry the weight of unquestioned truth’ (Loftuset al. 1995).In an attempt to resolve this controversy we turn to the survey evidence<strong>and</strong> focus on three interrelated issues:• the relationship between the hours of work <strong>and</strong> perceived experience oftime pressure• the incidence of perceived time pressure across population groups• other factors contributing to higher levels of time pressure.These issues are now discussed in turn.<strong>Work</strong>, leisure, time-pressure <strong>and</strong> stress 127Heavier workloads – higher levels of time pressure!Analyses of Canadian data show that there is an apparent relationshipbetween respondents’ hours of paid work <strong>and</strong> their levels of perceived timepressure. In 1998 some 88 per cent of respondents working over 50 hours perweek reported feeling rushed on an almost daily basis. For respondents workingunder 30 hours per week this figure was only 53 per cent. As shown inTable 7.3, the ‘composite index of time pressure’ for employees workingunder 30 hours per week is 45 points on a 100-point scale, but for employeesworking 40 to 50 hours it is 61 points, <strong>and</strong> for employees working in excess of50 hours it is 65 points.It has been suggested, for example by Greenhaus <strong>and</strong> Parasuraman(1987), that the effects of paid <strong>and</strong> unpaid work on time pressure <strong>and</strong> stressshould not be examined separately but jointly. According to Joner <strong>and</strong>Fletcher (1993), research on the interface between work <strong>and</strong> family suggeststhat these two domains are functionally interdependent <strong>and</strong> the events in onesphere impinge on the other. Not surprisingly, the association betweenrespondents’ combined paid <strong>and</strong> unpaid workloads <strong>and</strong> perceived time pressureis positive. As shown in Table 7.3, 89 per cent of those with combined workloadsin excess of 12 hours per day reported feeling ‘rushed’ almost dailycompared with only 52 per cent of those with combined workloads of fewerthan 8 hours per day. The relationship between amount of free time <strong>and</strong> senseof being pressed for time is, as expected, inverse to the relationship betweentime crunch <strong>and</strong> the amount of work. Only half of respondents reportingmore than 7 hours of free time per day felt rushed on an almost daily basis,compared to 85 per cent of respondents with fewer than 3 hours.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!