10.07.2015 Views

Work and Leisure

Work and Leisure

Work and Leisure

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3Postmodern work <strong>and</strong> leisureChris RojekIntroductionThe classical political economy of Ricardo, Bentham <strong>and</strong> J. S. Mill presentedpaid employment as the primary means through which the individualdevelops the self, morally <strong>and</strong> economically, <strong>and</strong> contributes to the wealth<strong>and</strong> well-being of the commons. <strong>Leisure</strong> was acknowledged to be thenecessary complement to work since, in the voluntary chosen activities ofnon-work time, individuals replenish themselves <strong>and</strong> freely develop their faculties<strong>and</strong> interests. Nonetheless, classical political economy seldom departedfrom the postulate that the a priori of leisure is paid employment.Interestingly, emancipatory politics in the nineteenth <strong>and</strong> for most of thetwentieth centuries typically confirmed this position. Karl Marx has someclaim to be regarded as the foremost critic of the work ethic in the nineteenthcentury. His analysis emphasised the forced nature of work, the usurpation ofvalue by the capitalist, the alienation <strong>and</strong> self-estrangement of the work process,<strong>and</strong> the need to rethink the relationship between work <strong>and</strong> society fromtop to bottom. Nevertheless, he was always blistering about his utopi<strong>and</strong>isciples who mistook communism for the end of work. In Marx’s view,capitalism condemned workers to exploitation <strong>and</strong> brutalisation. He heldthat the solution to this state of affairs was the determination of the lengths<strong>and</strong> ends of the work by the ‘socialized, associated producers, through thetranscendence of capitalism’ (Marx 1977: 820). He famously distinguishedbetween the realm of necessity <strong>and</strong> the realm of freedom. He argued thatunder communism the individual participates in multi-activity, which is voluntarilychosen <strong>and</strong> socially enriching. Underpinning this activity, however, isthe requirement to produce socially <strong>and</strong> economically necessary work. Therelevant passage in Capital submits:The realm of freedom actually begins only where labour which is determinedby necessity <strong>and</strong> mundane considerations ceases; thus in the verynature of things it lies beyond the sphere of actual material production.Just as the savage must wrestle with Nature to satisfy his wants, to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!