11.07.2015 Views

ghana climate change vulnerability and adaptation assessment

ghana climate change vulnerability and adaptation assessment

ghana climate change vulnerability and adaptation assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ABFigure 2.1 Two approaches to <strong>vulnerability</strong> analysis:(A) risk model of Sarewitz et al. (2003); (B) IPCC modelFigure 2.1 shows two approaches to assessing <strong>vulnerability</strong> to <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>. . The first approach is basedona risk model described by Sarewitz etal., (2003) where <strong>vulnerability</strong> is a systemcondition, shown here asconditionsof the natural <strong>and</strong> social sub-systems ina coupled model. In the second, <strong>vulnerability</strong> as defined bythe IPCC views <strong>vulnerability</strong> as the effects of <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> onn a biophysicall system (Carter et al., 2007;Schneider et al., 2007). Similarities <strong>and</strong> distinctionss are those suggested by Brooks (2003).The use of <strong>vulnerability</strong>by Sarewitz et al. (2003) encompasses both the <strong>vulnerability</strong> of social systems <strong>and</strong> theinherent <strong>vulnerability</strong> ofnatural systems. Many aspects of social <strong>vulnerability</strong> are generic inthat they arecommon across geographic scales; in contrast, aspects of inherent <strong>vulnerability</strong> are more location specific. AsBrooks (2003) emphasizes, <strong>vulnerability</strong> only makes sense in thee context of a specific system<strong>and</strong> range ofhazards, that is, <strong>vulnerability</strong> is “placebased” in that the scale off <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>assessment</strong> should match thescale of the decision-making (Schröter, Polsky et al. 2005).Mitigationmeasures aredirected toward reducing drivers of <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>; that is, reducing emissions ofCO 2 <strong>and</strong> other green house gases (GHG) or enhancing CO 2 sequestration. We examine some mitigationpolicies (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation <strong>and</strong> Degradation plus biodiversity or REDD+; CleanDevelopment Mechanism or CDM), strategies (conservation/low carbon agriculture, fire management, lowcarbon development), <strong>and</strong> practices (capturing <strong>and</strong>using naturall gas instead of flaring, biofuels). Oneimplicationof our approach is that <strong>adaptation</strong> measures are directed toward reducing <strong>vulnerability</strong>, whetherinherent, social, or both(Sarewitz, Pielke Jr et al. 2003). We examine <strong>vulnerability</strong> reductionfor threeresource sectors (agriculture, forestry, <strong>and</strong> fisheries) <strong>and</strong> locally sustainable <strong>adaptation</strong> measures for reducingsocial <strong>vulnerability</strong>.GHANA CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY ANDADAPTATION ASSESSMENT19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!