12.07.2015 Views

Literatura in cenzura - Društvo za primerjalno književnost - ZRC SAZU

Literatura in cenzura - Društvo za primerjalno književnost - ZRC SAZU

Literatura in cenzura - Društvo za primerjalno književnost - ZRC SAZU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Totalitarian and Post-totalitarianCensorship: From Hard to Soft?Marijan DovićInstitute of Slovenian Literature and Literary Studies SRC SASA, Ljubljanamarijan.dovic@zrc-sazu.siThis article deals with the relationships between totalitarian and post-totalitariancensorship, especially regard<strong>in</strong>g the censorship of literary works. A general conceptualoutl<strong>in</strong>e for discuss<strong>in</strong>g censorship is followed by an analysis of models and patternsof totalitarian – especially communist – censorship. The conclusion deals with someuseful areas to consider with regard to post-totalitarian literary censorship, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>geconomics (the capitalist book market), ethics (political correctness), and legislation.Keywords: literature and censorship / social systems / totalitarianism / post-totalitarianismUDK 82:351.751.582:316.7Like every concept that is really worth consider<strong>in</strong>g, censorship evades anultimate def<strong>in</strong>ition. It is actually radically problematic. Reduc<strong>in</strong>g it to a formal,<strong>in</strong>stitutional dimension that would merely encompass legal, political, andhierarchical aspects of the term seems <strong>in</strong>appropriate because this makes itimpossible to account for the complex effects of totalitarian practices ofcensorship. It is therefore <strong>in</strong>evitable to <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>formal, implicit dimensionsof censorship along with their reflections <strong>in</strong> self-censorship, but perhapsnot to such a degree as to <strong>in</strong>clude the self-censorship of an <strong>in</strong>ternal, <strong>in</strong>dividual“quiet censor”, which seems to operate without clearly identifiableexternal threats. 1 Thus it seems more productive to connect censorship witha certa<strong>in</strong> agent that does not have to be utterly concrete. It can adopt differentk<strong>in</strong>ds and degrees of <strong>in</strong>stitutionali<strong>za</strong>tion. Rulers and other <strong>in</strong>fluential<strong>in</strong>terest groups have always tried to control the circulation of ideas <strong>in</strong> societyand to restrict the <strong>in</strong>fluence of those that were potentially harmful to their<strong>in</strong>terests. To do so, a variety of procedures have been developed throughthe centuries – from ancient and medieval <strong>in</strong>dexes to monarchic and totalitariancensorships – that can be described by the term censorship.Censorship as a knot that b<strong>in</strong>ds power and knowledge (Jansen) hasrecently been more or less successfully coupled with various theoreticalconcepts. Jonathon Green, author of the Encyclopedia of Censorship, con-167Primerjalna <strong>književnost</strong> (Ljubljana) 31. Special Issue (2008)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!