12.07.2015 Views

Literatura in cenzura - Društvo za primerjalno književnost - ZRC SAZU

Literatura in cenzura - Društvo za primerjalno književnost - ZRC SAZU

Literatura in cenzura - Društvo za primerjalno književnost - ZRC SAZU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Undress<strong>in</strong>g Literary History:The Censorship of Same-Sex DesireAndrej ZavrlAdult Education Centre, Kranja.<strong>za</strong>vrl@hotmail.comThe area that seems to have been quite persistently controlled up to the present day isthat of sexual non-normativity. A clear expression of the still-present unspeakabilityof same-sex desire – as an <strong>in</strong>stance of such non-normativity – is seen <strong>in</strong> the differentways of censor<strong>in</strong>g literature represent<strong>in</strong>g same-sex desire.Keywords: literature and censorship / homosexuality / gay literature / lesbian literature /Slovene literary criticismUDK 821.09:176.8Perhaps the issues addressed <strong>in</strong> this article may no longer appear particularlyrelevant, especially at a time when gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender,<strong>in</strong>tersexual, and queer (GLBTIQ) issues are characteristically saidto have been largely ma<strong>in</strong>streamed and, at least <strong>in</strong> the West, relativelyemancipated. Indeed, has not the gay and lesbian affirmative, with its demandsfor positive representation, prevailed? Moreover, we live at a timewhen, as Michael Warner puts it, “most gay people want <strong>in</strong>-laws, not outlaws”(“Boys and the Banned”). Surely the times of the explicit censorshipof same-sex contents of works known from literary history are def<strong>in</strong>itelyover? Yet, why is it that the Slovenian title of the performance of Copi’splay L’homosexuel ou la difficulté de s’exprimer (1971), held <strong>in</strong> September 2007at the most prestigious Slovenian cultural centre, only reta<strong>in</strong>ed the secondpart of its orig<strong>in</strong>al title? 1Therefore I would like to consider some (mostly Slovenian) cases ofwhat I see as more or less implicit and discreet examples of censorship bycriticism and omission: examples of gloss<strong>in</strong>g over, refus<strong>in</strong>g to acknowledge,or repress<strong>in</strong>g same-sex desire <strong>in</strong> literary texts. Let us call this practicewhat it is: attempts to control the circulation of ideas <strong>in</strong> a society andto conf<strong>in</strong>e the <strong>in</strong>fluence of those that were (deemed) potentially harmfulthrough implicit and retroactive critical censorship. In other words,I would like to <strong>in</strong>vestigate how the “<strong>in</strong>tegrity” of literature can be – andoften is – subject to various manipulations. Also, to refer to the title of the259Primerjalna <strong>književnost</strong> (Ljubljana) 31. Special Issue (2008)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!