12.07.2015 Views

Literatura in cenzura - Društvo za primerjalno književnost - ZRC SAZU

Literatura in cenzura - Društvo za primerjalno književnost - ZRC SAZU

Literatura in cenzura - Društvo za primerjalno književnost - ZRC SAZU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Guido Bonsaver:Mussol<strong>in</strong>i's Fascism, Literary Censorship, and the VaticanAn example of theatrical censorship that is also exemplary of Mussol<strong>in</strong>i’s<strong>in</strong>volvement and, once more, of the <strong>in</strong>terference of the Catholic Church,concerns Sem Benelli’s play Cater<strong>in</strong>a da Siena (Cather<strong>in</strong>e of Siena). Benelliwas at the time a popular playwright, whose most successful work was Lacena delle beffe (The Feast of the Jesters, 1909), set <strong>in</strong> Renaissance Italy. Inthe w<strong>in</strong>ter of 1933–34, Benelli returned to a Renaissance sett<strong>in</strong>g, but thistime he chose a highly contentious theme. Cater<strong>in</strong>a Sfor<strong>za</strong> (1934) was ahistorical play conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g two scenes <strong>in</strong> which two popes – Sixtus IV andAlexander (Borgia) VI – were presented <strong>in</strong> no uncerta<strong>in</strong> terms as depravedand corrupt. When read<strong>in</strong>g the script, Zurlo expressed his reservations toMussol<strong>in</strong>i, who replied suggest<strong>in</strong>g a number of cuts, particularly regard<strong>in</strong>gthe representation of Sixtus IV. 8 Soon after send<strong>in</strong>g that note, however,Mussol<strong>in</strong>i must have suddenly changed his m<strong>in</strong>d, because Zurlo was toldthat Il Duce had decided to leave the play untouched. Unfortunately thedocumentation does not say what reason<strong>in</strong>g led him to that decision (butwe know that Zurlo double-checked and received the order confirmed bythe head of police). By then, the honeymoon period between the regimeand the Holy See was well over. Tensions had started to rise with regardto the competition between the youth organi<strong>za</strong>tions of each party, andthere had been numerous cases of violence on the part of the Fascists thatthe pope had condemned and Mussol<strong>in</strong>i tacitly tolerated. It could wellbe, therefore, that Mussol<strong>in</strong>i had simply decided to let the matter take itscourse, well aware of its negative effects. 9The production went ahead and Cater<strong>in</strong>a Sfor<strong>za</strong> was premiered <strong>in</strong> thecity of Forlì <strong>in</strong> February 1934. After the first unsuccessful protests of thelocal bishops and curates, once more it was decided to <strong>in</strong>tervene directlywith Mussol<strong>in</strong>i. This time the person <strong>in</strong>volved was one of the Vatican’smost senior diplomats, Father Pietro Tacchi Venturi, a Jesuit historianthat had been one of Pius XI’s trusted envoys dur<strong>in</strong>g the prolonged negotiationslead<strong>in</strong>g to the Lateran Pacts mentioned above. 10 After a meet<strong>in</strong>gbetween Tacchi Venturi and Mussol<strong>in</strong>i on 22 February, the latter agreed toban the play from be<strong>in</strong>g performed <strong>in</strong> the holy city of Rome (April 1933–34 was a special Jubilee Year). A few weeks later, however, it emerged thatBenelli’s company had every <strong>in</strong>tention of end<strong>in</strong>g their tour <strong>in</strong> Rome. TheVatican decided to return to the matter with <strong>in</strong>creased force. In additionto Tacchi Venturi, another senior diplomat – Card<strong>in</strong>al Giuseppe Piz<strong>za</strong>rdoof the Secretariat of State – was <strong>in</strong>volved. They both wrote to Mussol<strong>in</strong>ion 15 April 1934 rem<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g him of his promise not to have Cater<strong>in</strong>a Sfor<strong>za</strong>staged <strong>in</strong> Rome. Mussol<strong>in</strong>i, however, was determ<strong>in</strong>ed to let it happen andonly compromised by agree<strong>in</strong>g to the cut of the <strong>in</strong>itial scene <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>gPope Sixtus IV (as he had previously suggested to Zurlo). The Vatican205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!