12.07.2015 Views

Literatura in cenzura - Društvo za primerjalno književnost - ZRC SAZU

Literatura in cenzura - Društvo za primerjalno književnost - ZRC SAZU

Literatura in cenzura - Društvo za primerjalno književnost - ZRC SAZU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Communist and DemocraticCensorship <strong>in</strong> Slovenia: The Caseof Pupilija papa Pupilopa PupilčkiGašper TrohaUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Artsgasper.troha@guest.arnes.siRecent lawsuits aga<strong>in</strong>st writers (cf. Pikalo and Smolnikar) have not only raised theissue of relations between literature and reality, but also have illustrated an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>gtransformation <strong>in</strong> censorship practices <strong>in</strong> Slovenia after the fall of communism. Undercommunism the authorities usually suppressed literary texts or theatre performances,a practice that enabled the artists to cont<strong>in</strong>ue with their work while br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g them aconsiderable <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> popularity. The article analyses the case of the show Pupilijapapa Pupilo pa Pupilčki, which stirred up significant controversy both <strong>in</strong> 1969 and<strong>in</strong> 2006, when it was restaged/reconstructed. Differences <strong>in</strong> reactions to this showdemonstrate changes <strong>in</strong> formal and <strong>in</strong>formal control over cultural events.Keywords: literature and censorship / Slovenian theatre / Slovenian drama / theatre performances/ reconstruction / Jovanović, Dušan / Hrvat<strong>in</strong>, EmilUDK 792.03(497.4):351.758.1In the former Yugoslavia between 1945 and 1991 there was no officialtheatre censorship. Nevertheless, there was <strong>in</strong>formal censorship, and it wasperhaps even more effective. As Polde Bibič, a renowned Slovenian actordescribes it, “A Party official would call a general manager of a theatre andtell him not to perform a certa<strong>in</strong> theatrical text or to withdraw an ongo<strong>in</strong>gproduction from the programme” (Bibič 72). In 2007, the freshly renamedJanez Janša (born Emil Hrvat<strong>in</strong>), 1 the director of a reconstruction of Pupilijapapa Pupilo pa Pupilčki (Pupilija, Papa Pupilo, and the Pupilecks), told me thatthe slaughter of a hen at the end of the show was omitted because NevenkaKoprivšek, the manager of the Stara elektrarna [Old Power Station] wherethe production took place, did not approve of it. It was not so much an ethicalchoice as merely a pragmatic one because the organi<strong>za</strong>tion could have251Primerjalna <strong>književnost</strong> (Ljubljana) 31. Special Issue (2008)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!