February 1990 (J. Reddell, M. Reyes), 4 immature;16 February 1990 (J. Reddell, M. Reyes), 2 immature;Off Campus <strong>Cave</strong>, 8 April 1989 (W. Elliott, J.Reddell, M. Reyes), 2 immature; Steam <strong>Cave</strong>, 7July 1963 (J. Reddell, B. Russell), 2 immature;Three-Mile <strong>Cave</strong>, 30 March 1965 (J. Reddell), Iimmature; Walsh Ranch <strong>Cave</strong>, 24 August 1963 (J.Reddell, B. Russell), 1 immature; Williams <strong>Cave</strong>,24 August 1963 (J. Reddell, B. Russell), I immature;Wolf's <strong>Cave</strong>, 7 August 1983 (W. Elliott, B.Vinson, D. Pate), penultimate male.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe research material on which this paper isbased has been brought together by friends and colleaguesover a period of many years. One of the firststudents was Wilton Ivie who was responsible <strong>for</strong>basic work on the cicurine spiders and began studyof the Cicurella complex until his untimely death.The active field contributors have been speleologistslong devoted to systematic study of caves and cavefaunas. In this case no better reason <strong>for</strong> intensivestudy of cave cicurellas are the spiders themselveswhich have responded to cave stimuli to produce anunparalleled total of more than fifty completelyeyeless taxa within a quite limited geographical area.Caving demands devotion to arduous and often dangerousexcursions into many kinds of caves. Amongthe first Texas cave students were James R. Reddelland Robert W. Mitchell, who have devoted much oftheir field life to cave research in the United Statesand Mexico. We salute these and the many otherstudents as assistants during years of caving; manyof their names will be found among the describedtaxa. I am grateful to the following Museum caretakers<strong>for</strong> loans of types and other valuable specimens,and <strong>for</strong> the many special favors during thisstudy: Dr. W. G. Reeder, Texas Memorial Museum(TMM), Austin, Texas; Dr. Norman Platnick,American Museum of Natural History (AMNH),New York; Mr. Darrell Ubick, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Academyof Sciences (CAS), San Francisco.I am especially grateful <strong>for</strong> the cooperation andkindness of James R. Reddell during the process o<strong>for</strong>ganizing this study and bringing it to completion.LITERATURE CITEDBarr, T.C., Jr.• and J.R. Holsinger. 1985. Speciation in cavefaunas. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 16:313-337.Bonnet, P. 1956. Bibliographia Araneorum, 2(G-M), pp.1927-3026. Toulouse.Brignoli, P.M. 1983. A catalogue of the Araneae describedbetween 1940 and 1981. London: Manchester Univ. Press.518 pp.Chamberlin, R.V. 1933. On a new eyeless spider of the familyLinyphiidae from Potter Creek <strong>Cave</strong>, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. Pan-PacificEntomol.,9:122-124.Chamberlin, R.V., and W. Ivie. 1940. Agelenid spiders of thegenus Cicurina. Bull. Univ. Utah, BioI. Ser., 30:1-107.Comstock, J.H. 1912. The spider book. Garden City, NewYork: Doubleday, Page & Co. 721 pp., 771 figs.Exline, H. 1936. Nearctic spiders of the genus Cicurina Menge.American Mus. Novitates, no. 850. 25 pp.Forster, R.R. 1970. The spiders of New Zealand, Part III. OtagoMus. Bull., 3:1-184.Gertsch, W.J. 1935. Spiders from the southwestern United Stateswith descriptions of new species. American Mus. Novitates,no. 792. 31 pp.Gertsch, W.J. 1971. A report on some <strong>Mexican</strong> cave spiders.Assoc. <strong>Mexican</strong> <strong>Cave</strong> Stud. Bull., 4:47-111.Gertsch, W.J. 1974. The spider family Leptonetidae in NorthAmerica. J. Arachnol., 1: 145-203.Gertsch, W.J. 1977. Report on cavernicole and epigean spidersfrom the Yucatan Peninsula. Assoc. <strong>Mexican</strong> <strong>Cave</strong> Stud.Bull., 6:103-131.Gertsch, W.J. 1984. The spider family Nesticidae (Araneae) inNorth America, Central America, and the West Indies. TexasMem. Mus. Bull., 31. 91 pp.Gertsch, W.J., and L.I. Davis. 1936. Spiders of the southwesternUnited States with descriptions of new spiders. AmericanMus. Novitates, no. 1936, pp. 1-31,39 figs.Ivie, W. 1965. The spiders of the genus lslandiana (Linyphiidae,Erigoninae). American Mus. Novitates, no. 2221. 25 pp.Keyserling, E. 1886. Die Spinnen Amerikas. Theridiidae, partU. Nurnberg, 1886,2(2):1-295, pis. I-XI.Lehtinen, P.T. 1967. Classification of the cribellate spiders andsome allied families, with notes on the evolution of the suborderAraneomorphae. Annal. ZooI. Fennici, 4:199-468,figs. 1-524.Menge, A. 1871. Preussische Spinnen, IV. Schr. naturf. Ges.Danzig, N.F., 2:265-296.Nicholas, Bro. G. 1960. Checklist of macroscopic troglobiticorganisms of the United States. American MidI. Nat., 64:123-160.Petrunkevitch, A. 1911. A synonymic index-catalogue of spidersof North, Central and South America, etc .... Bull. AmericanMus. Nat. Hist., 19.791 pp.Platnick, N.I. 1989. Advances in spider taxonomy. Manchester:Manchester Univ. Press. 720 pp.Simon, E. 1898. Histoire naturelle des Araignees, 2(2): 193-380.Paris.Tellkampf, T. 1844. Beschreibung einiger neuer in der MammuthH6hlein Kentucky aufgefundener Gattungen von Gliedertieren.Arch. Naturg., 10(1):318-322, pI. VIII.Vogel, B.R. 1967. A list of new North American spiders.American Entomol. Soc., Acad. Nat. Sci., Philadelphia. 196pp.This is publication No. N.S.-57 of the Texas Memorial Museum.122
Roth, V.D. 1992. A new and first troglobitic spider from Arizona (Thymoires, Theridiidae). Texas Mem. Mus., Speleol. Monogr.,3:123-126A NEW AND FIRST TROGLOBITIC SPIDER FROM ARIZONA(THYMOITES, THERIDIIDAE)Vincent D. RothSpider Lane # IBox 136Portal, AZ 85632ABSTRACTThe first troglobitic spider from Arizona, Thymoires minero,new species, is described from Southwestern <strong>Cave</strong>, CochiseCounty. This is the first troglobitic Thymoires and the firsttroglobitic species of the Theridiidae in North America.INTRODUCTIONArizona has a depauperate cave fauna mainlyconsisting of troxloxenes and troglophiles (Roth,unpublished; Peck 1980) and a few troglobites.Barr's (1963) definition of troglobites would includeonly the following blind <strong>for</strong>ms: the isopod Brackenridgiasphinxensis Schultz (1984), an amphipod,Stygobromus arizonensis Holsinger (1974), a phreatobite,and possibly the collembolan, Tomocerussp., and campodeid, Haplocampa sp., the latter twolisted by Peck.Peck presented a list of species taken from cavesin the Grand Canyon, used a broadened definition ofthe term "troglobite," and included a "cave adapted... low level or relatively unspecialized" spider(Telema sp., Telernidae) as a troglobite. Barr wouldidentify this as a troglophile. He describes troglobitesas "those obligative cavernicoles -usuallydistinguished morphologically by regression of pigmentand photoreceptors, and frequently by longer,more slender appendages than their epigean congeners.In the absence of regressive andlor adaptivemodifications frequently associated with troglobites,an animal, even though known only from caves, isusually (and probably should be) considered atroglophile. " This is the criteria followed in this paperand accordingly some of Peck's "troglobites ordisjunct troglobites" must be considered troglophilesor disjunct troglophiles, or, at the most, incipienttroglobites.Undescribed female telernids have a FIC index of260, (femur I length/carapace length X 100), <strong>for</strong> aneyeless troglobite, 218 carapace length <strong>for</strong> an eyedtroglophile, and 170 <strong>for</strong> an epigean species. Peck'sTelema sp. showed the presence of pigmented eyes,not reduced in size, integument slightly pigmented,and not much longer legs than normal with a F/Cindex of 195, obviously a troglophile.This suggests that the new species of Thymoites(Theridiidae) is the first spider troglobite knownfrom Arizona. It is unpigmented, has only pale eyespots except <strong>for</strong> the AME which do not appearfunctional and are irregularly pigmented and moreslender legs with a F/C index of 169 - 197 (males)and 194 - 219 (females) compared with eight epigeanspecies with an index of 94 - 161 (males) and96-136 (females).Few Theridiidae are troglobites. Styposis havethe AME reduced or lost (Levi 1959a, 1964a) butare not cave species.The 6-eyed Comaroma (= Archerius) is not atheridiid and its transfer to the Anapidae by Wunderlich(1986) was overlooked by both Peck andShear (1987) and Merrett and Ashmole (1989). Theydescribed the first theridiid troglobites, the blindTheridion streptipes (Peck and Shear) from the123
- Page 7 and 8:
PREFACEThe present volume is the se
- Page 9:
TABLE OF CONTENTSHOLSINGER, JOHN R.
- Page 12 and 13:
the state of Coahuila in northern M
- Page 14 and 15:
Fig. 2.-Anesia welboumi, new specie
- Page 16 and 17:
\\. \ - -' ..........---~\ I// --..
- Page 18 and 19:
Mexiweckelia hardeni, new speciesFi
- Page 20:
2 sets of 1 or 2 setae each; dactyl
- Page 23 and 24:
AFig. 7.-Holsingerius smaragdinus,
- Page 25 and 26:
have as many setae on the inner pla
- Page 28:
Antenna 1 about 33 % length of body
- Page 31 and 32:
Of biogeographic interest for the h
- Page 33 and 34:
Bowman, T .E. 1992. Two subterranea
- Page 35 and 36:
A note by Scott Harden that accompa
- Page 37 and 38:
~~..~ ~~ I))\\ "-,'.=bFig. 3.-Speoc
- Page 39 and 40:
unarmed, except in pleopod 2, which
- Page 41 and 42:
Cokendolpher, LC., and l.R. Reddell
- Page 43 and 44:
lobes. The larger setae vary greatl
- Page 45 and 46:
the relationships of the order and
- Page 47 and 48:
zomids their absence is considered
- Page 49 and 50:
some species could be either split,
- Page 51 and 52:
have small pores over the surface o
- Page 53 and 54:
inhabits tropical deciduous forest
- Page 55 and 56:
huitvnolotitlensis from A. stygius
- Page 57 and 58:
8-10, figs. 5-7; Rowland, 1973c:136
- Page 59 and 60:
(in row) and one pair large posteri
- Page 61 and 62:
(0.34); tarsus 0.64 (0.58); total 4
- Page 63 and 64:
Abdomen: Tergite I with two pairs a
- Page 65 and 66:
setae near posterior margin. stemit
- Page 67:
setae, and ten ventral setae. Stemi
- Page 71 and 72:
1,980 m elev., 26 Dec. 1986 (T. Tre
- Page 73 and 74:
asitarsal-tarsal proportions: 15:4:
- Page 75 and 76:
and one pair setae at base of proce
- Page 77 and 78:
Cephalothorax: Propeltidium 1.66 mm
- Page 79 and 80:
Male adult unknown.Immature paratyp
- Page 81 and 82: IV: trochanter 1.20 (1.10); femur 3
- Page 83 and 84: Cokendolpher, 1.C. 1981. The order
- Page 85 and 86: Gertsch, W.J. 1992. Distribution pa
- Page 87 and 88: same families and genera, but also
- Page 89 and 90: species from the United States and
- Page 91 and 92: the posterior median pair short and
- Page 93 and 94: great many species of North America
- Page 95 and 96: Key to the Eyed Females1. Eight eye
- Page 97 and 98: 39111012Figs. 1-12.-Ventral and dor
- Page 99 and 100: 1419 23Figs. 13-24.-Ventral and dor
- Page 101 and 102: 27 293334Figs. 25-36.-Ventral and d
- Page 103 and 104: Figs. 37-48.-Ventral and retrolater
- Page 105 and 106: Cicurina blanco, new speciesFigs. 7
- Page 107 and 108: Type-data.-Female holotype from ins
- Page 109 and 110: Description.-Female holotype: Lengt
- Page 111 and 112: Description.-Female holotype: Lengt
- Page 113 and 114: lengths: first femur 2 rom, fourth
- Page 115 and 116: Cicurina pablo, new speciesFigs. 10
- Page 117 and 118: Description.-Female holotype: Lengt
- Page 119 and 120: canal in nearly vertical posItion;
- Page 121 and 122: Cicurina vespera, new speciesFigs.
- Page 123 and 124: procurved canal across sac; connect
- Page 125 and 126: Cicurina caverna, new speciesFigs.
- Page 127 and 128: with sac of similar size set in obl
- Page 129 and 130: February 1964 (J. Reddell, D. McKen
- Page 131: County: Diamond Cave, 16 August 196
- Page 135 and 136: LITERATURE CITEDBarr, T.C. 1963. Ec
- Page 137 and 138: Muchmore, W.B. 1992. Cavernicolous
- Page 139 and 140: Species of Aphrastochthonius are kn
- Page 141 and 142: FAMILY NEOBISIIDAE CHAMBERLINGenus
- Page 143 and 144: trochanter 2.5 (2.6), femur 5.55 (5
- Page 145 and 146: ottom of entrance pit, Ogle Cave (O
- Page 147 and 148: tactile seta on tibia and basitarsu
- Page 149 and 150: Missouri may be conspecific (unpubl
- Page 151 and 152: Trichobothriotaxy of chela generall
- Page 153 and 154: Female (figures given first for all
- Page 155 and 156: transverse furrows; eyespots not ev
- Page 157 and 158: Reddell and W. Russell); I female f
- Page 159 and 160: and Acuminochernes, along with the
- Page 161 and 162: Chamberlin, J.C. 1946. The genera a
- Page 163: (0.36); chela (without pedicel) 2.0
- Page 167 and 168: although not recently studied is no
- Page 169 and 170: and stylar outgrowths, present in s
- Page 171 and 172: in Phalangodes (et al.) is thick an
- Page 173 and 174: pairs) are found in six species: T.
- Page 175 and 176: elated species IS probably best int
- Page 177 and 178: legs than expected (2.6-3.2). This
- Page 179 and 180: ~ 3.3 are synapomorphic); all trogl
- Page 181 and 182: TAXONOMYTEXELLA Goodnight and Goodn
- Page 183 and 184:
14. BK absent (Figs. 177, 180). SA
- Page 185 and 186:
Figs. 8-11.-Texella bijUrcata (Brig
- Page 187 and 188:
Description.-Total body length, 1.5
- Page 189 and 190:
male examined closely has fewer set
- Page 191 and 192:
Figs. 26-29.-Texella kokoweej, new
- Page 193 and 194:
apical region which loses the apica
- Page 195 and 196:
Figs. 38-41.-Texella shoshone, new
- Page 197 and 198:
Distribution.-Known only from the t
- Page 199 and 200:
Figs. 52-55.-Texella brevistyla, ne
- Page 201 and 202:
Texellajungi, new speciesFigs. 60-7
- Page 203 and 204:
Figs. 66-69.-Texellajungi, new spec
- Page 205 and 206:
than S; SA with laterobasal carina
- Page 207 and 208:
~81//J/'/ ;'?/ ~~.........--~~I, II
- Page 209 and 210:
cylindrical, retina and cornea abse
- Page 211 and 212:
Figs. 93-96.-Texella cokendolpheri,
- Page 213 and 214:
SA with well developed prong and re
- Page 215 and 216:
Figs. 105-108.-Texelia mulaiki Good
- Page 217 and 218:
and McCarty Caves, which are known
- Page 219 and 220:
Color orange. Body of medium rugosi
- Page 221 and 222:
Notes.-The type locality was errone
- Page 223 and 224:
Figs. 128-131.-Taella reyesi, new s
- Page 225 and 226:
Figs. 136-139.-Texella reyesi, new
- Page 227 and 228:
Figs. 144-147.-Texella reyesi, new
- Page 229 and 230:
Figs. 152-155.-Texella reyesi, new
- Page 231 and 232:
1989 (W. Elliott, J. Reddell, and M
- Page 233 and 234:
Table 3.-Continued.# locality sex S
- Page 235 and 236:
mesoapical; patella, 2 mesal; tibia
- Page 237 and 238:
Figs. 162-165.-Texella gmbbsi, new
- Page 239 and 240:
Figs. 166-169.-Texella diplospina,
- Page 241 and 242:
Figs. 174-177.-Texella renkesae, ma
- Page 243 and 244:
Figs. 178-18\.-Teulla spinoperca, n
- Page 245 and 246:
Distribution.-Known only from Fayet
- Page 247 and 248:
Figs. 190-193.-Texellafendi, new sp
- Page 249 and 250:
CLASSIFICAnONTexellabifurcata group
- Page 251 and 252:
Chandler, D.S. 1992. The Pselaphida
- Page 253 and 254:
Key to Species1. Abdominal segments
- Page 255 and 256:
stemite VI slightly impressed at ba
- Page 257 and 258:
vertexal carinae, and the laterally
- Page 259 and 260:
is associated with rotten woods (Ch
- Page 261 and 262:
small ventral carina near base, pro
- Page 263:
Grigarick, A.A., and R.O. Schuster.
- Page 266 and 267:
Cicurifla (Cicurella) holsiflgeri G