searchable PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies

More documents

Recommendations

Info

24reyesi75,6_1----109-"7""---8312redde11io~seinoeercamu1aikidip1osoina-- -r•}--+'----renkes iMap 5.-Map of the Balcones Escarpment, central Texas, showing caves where Texella species have been collected. Degree oftroglomorphy indicated by symbols: open circle = troglophiles (eyes well developed); black dot = troglobites with partial to completeloss of cornea; mixed symbol = troglobites with well developed corneas. The numbers show the caves from which adults of thereddelli infragroup are known (see Table 3). (Although not indicated on the map, T. mulaiki also occurs sympatrically with T.diplospina and T. renkesi.)224
mesoapical; patella, 2 mesal; tibia, 3 mesal. Tarsalcount: 3-5-5-6.Penis (Fig. 161): VPP apically rounded, somewhatexpanded along mid-dorsal margin; with 4dorsal, 22? lateral, and 7 ventral setae; AS mediumsized, apically broad, brushy. Glans: BK robust,length shorter than basal diameter; ML broad; PSLclaw-like. S straight, apically spatulate, with ventralcarina; BF well developed; SA represented by apair of short lateral prongs.Female: Unknown.Natural History.-This species occurs sympatricallywith another laniatorid, Hoplobunus species(Gonyleptoidea). The collection data reads: "Mosquitonet placed in stream".Other Material Examined.-None.Distribution.-Known only from Honey CreekCave, Comal County, Texas (Maps 2-4).Texella grubbsi, new speciesFigs. 160, 162-165.Diagnosis.-Males of Texella grubbsi may bedistinguished from all other Texella by the large,robust basal knob distinctly longer than the basaldiameter (Fig. 160).Type.-Male holotype from Burnett Ranch Cave,7 mi W Wimberly, Hays County, Texas ("1982";A. Grubbs), deposited in CAS.Etymology.-The specific name is a patronym inhonor of Mr. Andy G. Grubbs, collector of this andnumerous other species of Texella.Description.-Total body length, 1.62-1.82.Scute length, 1.21-1.31. Leg II length, 4.5'1-4.67.Leg II/Scute length, 3.56-3.73. (N = 4).Color brownish orange. Body coarsely rugose;tubercles on eye mound, pars thoracica, and coxae;tergite margins smooth. Carapace with 2 pairs AT.Eye mound a robust, rounded cone; eyes well developed.Palpal megaspines: trochanter, 2 ventral,small; femur, 2 mesoapical; patella, 2 mesal; tibia,3 mesal. Tarsal count: 3-5-5-5.Male (holotype): Total body length, 1.82. Scutelength, 1.31; width, 1.38. Eye mound length, 0.36;width, 0.36. Leg II length, 4.67. TrIV spur large,apically bent, length, 0.59. POP length, 0.26.Penis (Figs. 160, 162-165): VPP apically rounded;with 4 dorsal, 18 lateral, and 5 ventral setae;setae long on apical half of prong; AS of moderatelength, slightly curved, with apical brush. Glans:BK large, conical; ML broad; PSL claw-like. Slong, slightly bent, ventrally carinate, apicallyspatulate; BF present; SA represented by two, short,basolateral prongs.Female (paratopotype): Total body length, 1.62.Scute length, 1.23; width, 1.33. Eye mound length,0.31; width, 0.31. Leg II length, 4.51. TrIV withtwo ventral tubercles.Ovipositor: cuticle intricately folded; dorsal surfacelacking apparent microspines; 1 pair apicalteeth present; setal pattern: 1 pair dorsal, 4 lateral,1 ventral.Variation.-The TrIV spur varies in length from0.46-0.59, and the POP from 0.23-0.26, in the threeavailable males.Other Material Examined (Paratypes).- UNITED STATES: Texas: Hays Co.: Burnett RanchCave, 7 mi W Wimberly, "1982" (A. Grubbs,TMM, CAS), 2 males, 1 female.Distribution.-Known only from Burnett RanchCave, Hays County, Texas (Maps 2-4).The spinoperca InfragroupDiagnosis.-The females of this infragroup aredistinguished from all other Texella, except T. shoshoneand jungi, by the presence of 1-2 pairs ofspines or tubercles on the anterior margin of thegenital operculum (Figs. 171, 173, 182, 183, 194,197). The males are distinguished from all otherTexella by the following combination of characters:VPP with dorsal margin expanded; VPP setae long;AS apically polyfurcate to plumose; BK absent; SAapically produced into long prongs (except in T.homi); S apically spatulate (except T. fendi andhomi) (Figs. 168, 169-170, 174-181, 186-191,198-201).Range.-Known only from eastern central Texas(Maps 3,4).Texella diplospina, new speciesFigs. 166-171.Diagnosis.-Males of this species are distinguishedfrom others in the infragroup by the followingcombination of characters: GO lacking apicaltubercles; VPP with three dorsal setae; SA prongsoriginating medioventrally on stylus; S narrowlyspatulate (Figs. 168-170). Females differ fromthose of other Texella in having 2 pairs of apicalspines on the GO (Fig. 171).Type.-Male holotype from Ladder Cave, HaysCounty, Texas (2 Sep. 1989; D. Ubick, S. Fend, S.Renkes), deposited in CAS.Etymology.-The specific name refers to the 2pairs of apical spines on the female genital opercula.Description.-Total body length, 1.41-1.74.225
Page 7 and 8:
PREFACEThe present volume is the se
Page 9:
TABLE OF CONTENTSHOLSINGER, JOHN R.
Page 12 and 13:
the state of Coahuila in northern M
Page 14 and 15:
Fig. 2.-Anesia welboumi, new specie
Page 16 and 17:
\\. \ - -' ..........---~\ I// --..
Page 18 and 19:
Mexiweckelia hardeni, new speciesFi
Page 20:
2 sets of 1 or 2 setae each; dactyl
Page 23 and 24:
AFig. 7.-Holsingerius smaragdinus,
Page 25 and 26:
have as many setae on the inner pla
Page 28:
Antenna 1 about 33 % length of body
Page 31 and 32:
Of biogeographic interest for the h
Page 33 and 34:
Bowman, T .E. 1992. Two subterranea
Page 35 and 36:
A note by Scott Harden that accompa
Page 37 and 38:
~~..~ ~~ I))\\ "-,'.=bFig. 3.-Speoc
Page 39 and 40:
unarmed, except in pleopod 2, which
Page 41 and 42:
Cokendolpher, LC., and l.R. Reddell
Page 43 and 44:
lobes. The larger setae vary greatl
Page 45 and 46:
the relationships of the order and
Page 47 and 48:
zomids their absence is considered
Page 49 and 50:
some species could be either split,
Page 51 and 52:
have small pores over the surface o
Page 53 and 54:
inhabits tropical deciduous forest
Page 55 and 56:
huitvnolotitlensis from A. stygius
Page 57 and 58:
8-10, figs. 5-7; Rowland, 1973c:136
Page 59 and 60:
(in row) and one pair large posteri
Page 61 and 62:
(0.34); tarsus 0.64 (0.58); total 4
Page 63 and 64:
Abdomen: Tergite I with two pairs a
Page 65 and 66:
setae near posterior margin. stemit
Page 67:
setae, and ten ventral setae. Stemi
Page 71 and 72:
1,980 m elev., 26 Dec. 1986 (T. Tre
Page 73 and 74:
asitarsal-tarsal proportions: 15:4:
Page 75 and 76:
and one pair setae at base of proce
Page 77 and 78:
Cephalothorax: Propeltidium 1.66 mm
Page 79 and 80:
Male adult unknown.Immature paratyp
Page 81 and 82:
IV: trochanter 1.20 (1.10); femur 3
Page 83 and 84:
Cokendolpher, 1.C. 1981. The order
Page 85 and 86:
Gertsch, W.J. 1992. Distribution pa
Page 87 and 88:
same families and genera, but also
Page 89 and 90:
species from the United States and
Page 91 and 92:
the posterior median pair short and
Page 93 and 94:
great many species of North America
Page 95 and 96:
Key to the Eyed Females1. Eight eye
Page 97 and 98:
39111012Figs. 1-12.-Ventral and dor
Page 99 and 100:
1419 23Figs. 13-24.-Ventral and dor
Page 101 and 102:
27 293334Figs. 25-36.-Ventral and d
Page 103 and 104:
Figs. 37-48.-Ventral and retrolater
Page 105 and 106:
Cicurina blanco, new speciesFigs. 7
Page 107 and 108:
Type-data.-Female holotype from ins
Page 109 and 110:
Description.-Female holotype: Lengt
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
lengths: first femur 2 rom, fourth
Page 115 and 116:
Cicurina pablo, new speciesFigs. 10
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
canal in nearly vertical posItion;
Page 121 and 122:
Cicurina vespera, new speciesFigs.
Page 123 and 124:
procurved canal across sac; connect
Page 125 and 126:
Cicurina caverna, new speciesFigs.
Page 127 and 128:
with sac of similar size set in obl
Page 129 and 130:
February 1964 (J. Reddell, D. McKen
Page 131 and 132:
County: Diamond Cave, 16 August 196
Page 133 and 134:
Roth, V.D. 1992. A new and first tr
Page 135 and 136:
LITERATURE CITEDBarr, T.C. 1963. Ec
Page 137 and 138:
Muchmore, W.B. 1992. Cavernicolous
Page 139 and 140:
Species of Aphrastochthonius are kn
Page 141 and 142:
FAMILY NEOBISIIDAE CHAMBERLINGenus
Page 143 and 144:
trochanter 2.5 (2.6), femur 5.55 (5
Page 145 and 146:
ottom of entrance pit, Ogle Cave (O
Page 147 and 148:
tactile seta on tibia and basitarsu
Page 149 and 150:
Missouri may be conspecific (unpubl
Page 151 and 152:
Trichobothriotaxy of chela generall
Page 153 and 154:
Female (figures given first for all
Page 155 and 156:
transverse furrows; eyespots not ev
Page 157 and 158:
Reddell and W. Russell); I female f
Page 159 and 160:
and Acuminochernes, along with the
Page 161 and 162:
Chamberlin, J.C. 1946. The genera a
Page 163:
(0.36); chela (without pedicel) 2.0
Page 167 and 168:
although not recently studied is no
Page 169 and 170:
and stylar outgrowths, present in s
Page 171 and 172:
in Phalangodes (et al.) is thick an
Page 173 and 174:
pairs) are found in six species: T.
Page 175 and 176:
elated species IS probably best int
Page 177 and 178:
legs than expected (2.6-3.2). This
Page 179 and 180:
~ 3.3 are synapomorphic); all trogl
Page 181 and 182:
TAXONOMYTEXELLA Goodnight and Goodn
Page 183 and 184: 14. BK absent (Figs. 177, 180). SA
Page 185 and 186: Figs. 8-11.-Texella bijUrcata (Brig
Page 187 and 188: Description.-Total body length, 1.5
Page 189 and 190: male examined closely has fewer set
Page 191 and 192: Figs. 26-29.-Texella kokoweej, new
Page 193 and 194: apical region which loses the apica
Page 195 and 196: Figs. 38-41.-Texella shoshone, new
Page 197 and 198: Distribution.-Known only from the t
Page 199 and 200: Figs. 52-55.-Texella brevistyla, ne
Page 201 and 202: Texellajungi, new speciesFigs. 60-7
Page 203 and 204: Figs. 66-69.-Texellajungi, new spec
Page 205 and 206: than S; SA with laterobasal carina
Page 207 and 208: ~81//J/'/ ;'?/ ~~.........--~~I, II
Page 209 and 210: cylindrical, retina and cornea abse
Page 211 and 212: Figs. 93-96.-Texella cokendolpheri,
Page 213 and 214: SA with well developed prong and re
Page 215 and 216: Figs. 105-108.-Texelia mulaiki Good
Page 217 and 218: and McCarty Caves, which are known
Page 219 and 220: Color orange. Body of medium rugosi
Page 221 and 222: Notes.-The type locality was errone
Page 223 and 224: Figs. 128-131.-Taella reyesi, new s
Page 225 and 226: Figs. 136-139.-Texella reyesi, new
Page 231 and 232: 1989 (W. Elliott, J. Reddell, and M
Page 233: Table 3.-Continued.# locality sex S
Page 237 and 238: Figs. 162-165.-Texella gmbbsi, new
Page 239 and 240: Figs. 166-169.-Texella diplospina,
Page 241 and 242: Figs. 174-177.-Texella renkesae, ma
Page 243 and 244: Figs. 178-18\.-Teulla spinoperca, n
Page 245 and 246: Distribution.-Known only from Fayet
Page 247 and 248: Figs. 190-193.-Texellafendi, new sp
Page 249 and 250: CLASSIFICAnONTexellabifurcata group
Page 251 and 252: Chandler, D.S. 1992. The Pselaphida
Page 253 and 254: Key to Species1. Abdominal segments
Page 255 and 256: stemite VI slightly impressed at ba
Page 257 and 258: vertexal carinae, and the laterally
Page 259 and 260: is associated with rotten woods (Ch
Page 261 and 262: small ventral carina near base, pro
Page 263: Grigarick, A.A., and R.O. Schuster.
Page 266 and 267: Cicurifla (Cicurella) holsiflgeri G
show all

searchable PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?