searchable PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies

More documents

Recommendations

Info

plate; and e) coxa 1 larger than coxa 2. Despitethese important differences, this genus and Me.xiweckeliaare apparently closely related, as alreadyindicated. This relationship is strongly supported byseveral mouthpart characters of the new species describedbelow that appear to be intermediate betweenthe two genera. Holsingerius is also closely relatedto Te.xiweckelia, as evidenced by their number ofshared similarities, which include especially thestructure of the gnathopods, coxae, and uropods (seeHolsinger and Longley, 1980).Holsingerius smaragdinus, new speciesFigs. 7-9Material examined.-TEXAS: Val VerdeCounty: Emerald Sink (<strong>Cave</strong>), 3.2 km N of Langtry,female holotype and 3 female paratypes, D. Cannyand S. J. Harden, 25 May 1985; 2 female paratypes,R. M. Waters, 31 Mar. 1984.The holotype is deposited in the National Museumof Natural History (USNM 239478); paratypesare deposited in the author's collection.Diagnosis.-A medium-sized cavemicolous speciesintermediate in some mouthpart characters betweenMe.xiweckelia and Holsingerius but havingmore characters of the latter and herein provisionallyassigned to this genus. Distinguished from Holsingeriussamacos, the only other species in this genus,by presence of a vestigial lacinia mobilis onright mandible; smaller inner plate of maxilla 1 withapproximately 1/2 as many medial setae; shorter innerplate of maxilla 2, which is not sub-rectangularin shape and has significantly fewer facial setae;shorter row of plumose setae on inner margin of innerplate of maxilliped; absence of setules from uppermargins of dactyls of pereopods 5-7; and presenceof long, plumose setae on inner or outer ramiof uropods 1 and 2. Largest female, 8.5 mm; maleunknown.Female.-Antenna 1 85-90% length of body, ca.65 % longer than antenna 2, primary flagellum with39-42 segments, lacking esthetascs; accessory flagellumabsent. Antenna 2 with 13 flagellar segments.Mandible: molars prominent; right mandible withspine apparently representing vestigial lacinia mobilis,2 long plumose accessory spines and molar seta;left with well developed, 4-dentate lacinia mobilis, 2accessory spines, but lacking molar seta. Inner lobesof lower lip vestigial or absent. Maxilla 1: innerplate with 19-20 medial, plumose setae; outer platewith 7 apical, serrate spines; palps symmetrical,broadest distally, bearing 4 spines at or near apexand 4-5 setae subapically (cf., Holsingerius samacos).Maxilla 2: inner plate narrowing distally, withoblique, submarginal row of ca. 29 naked, facial setae.Maxilliped: inner plate rather broad, bearing 4bladespines apically and setae apically/subapically,and row of plumose setae on inner margin; outerplate broadest medially, bearing short row of bladespineson inner margin near apex; palp segment 3with inner distal lobe.Gnathopod I: propod proportionately small, palmshort, with few tiny spines and several setae, medialfacial setae few, posterior margin longer than palm,with setae; carpus longer than propod, producedposteriorly into prominent, pubescent lobe which isbroadest proximal to distal end (as in H. samacos),bearing several groups of long setae; posterior marginof basis setose; coxa rather deep and broadly expanded,with 2 short, marginal setae. Gnathopod 2:propod relatively narrow, elongate, narrowingslightly and unevenly distally, palm oblique, short,armed with double row of ca. 6 small spine teeth,defining angle with several tiny spines and 2 longsetae, medial (inner facial) setae absent, but both anteriorand posterior margins bearing row of long setae;dactyl short, rather stout, nail short; carpussubtriangular, posterior margin lobi<strong>for</strong>m and pubescent,lobe broadest proximal to distal end (as ingnathopod 1 and in H. samacos), bearing 5 or 6clusters of long setae; coxa smaller than that ofgnathopod 1, little deeper than broad. Pereopods 3and 4 subequal, bases rather broad and bearing shortspines on anterior margin and longer (slender)spines on posterior margin; coxa about as deep asbroad, with 2 marginal setules; coxa 4 not lobate.Pereopod 7 65-70% length of body, little longerthan pereopod 6, ca. 25 % longer than pereopod 5.Bases of pereopods 5-7 moderately broad, posteriormargins broadly convex, distoposterior lobes welldeveloped; dactyl of pereopod 5 about 50% lengthof corresponding propod, dactyls of pereopods 6 and7 ca. 35-40 % length of corresponding propods; dactylswithout setules on upper margins. Coxal gillslarge, prominent, usually ellipsoidal, sometimessubovate, with distinct peduncles. Brood platessmall, narrow, and nonsetose in material examined.Pleonal plates similar to those of H. samacos,comers produced (especially plates 2 and 3), bearingI setule each. Pleopod peduncles with 6-7 couplingspines each on inner margins. Uronites 1 and 2 with2 small dorsodistal spines each, uronite 3 with 6-8such spines. Uropod I: inner ramus subequal inlength to outer, shorter than peduncle, with about 5apical and 2 lateral spines; outer ramus with apicaland lateral spines and row of 5 rather long, plumose12
AFig. 7.-Holsingerius smaragdinus, new species, paratype female (8.0 mm), Emerald Sink, Val Verde Co., TX: A, B, left & rightmandibles; C, left maxilla I; D, palp of right maxilla I; E, lower lip; F, maxilla 2; G, maxilliped; H, I, antennae I, 2. (Lower lip tosmaller scale than other mouthparts; antennae to same scale).13
Page 7 and 8: PREFACEThe present volume is the se
Page 9: TABLE OF CONTENTSHOLSINGER, JOHN R.
Page 12 and 13: the state of Coahuila in northern M
Page 14 and 15: Fig. 2.-Anesia welboumi, new specie
Page 16 and 17: \\. \ - -' ..........---~\ I// --..
Page 18 and 19: Mexiweckelia hardeni, new speciesFi
Page 20: 2 sets of 1 or 2 setae each; dactyl
Page 25 and 26: have as many setae on the inner pla
Page 28: Antenna 1 about 33 % length of body
Page 31 and 32: Of biogeographic interest for the h
Page 33 and 34: Bowman, T .E. 1992. Two subterranea
Page 35 and 36: A note by Scott Harden that accompa
Page 37 and 38: ~~..~ ~~ I))\\ "-,'.=bFig. 3.-Speoc
Page 39 and 40: unarmed, except in pleopod 2, which
Page 41 and 42: Cokendolpher, LC., and l.R. Reddell
Page 43 and 44: lobes. The larger setae vary greatl
Page 45 and 46: the relationships of the order and
Page 47 and 48: zomids their absence is considered
Page 49 and 50: some species could be either split,
Page 51 and 52: have small pores over the surface o
Page 53 and 54: inhabits tropical deciduous forest
Page 55 and 56: huitvnolotitlensis from A. stygius
Page 57 and 58: 8-10, figs. 5-7; Rowland, 1973c:136
Page 59 and 60: (in row) and one pair large posteri
Page 61 and 62: (0.34); tarsus 0.64 (0.58); total 4
Page 63 and 64: Abdomen: Tergite I with two pairs a
Page 65 and 66: setae near posterior margin. stemit
Page 67: setae, and ten ventral setae. Stemi
Page 71 and 72:
1,980 m elev., 26 Dec. 1986 (T. Tre
Page 73 and 74:
asitarsal-tarsal proportions: 15:4:
Page 75 and 76:
and one pair setae at base of proce
Page 77 and 78:
Cephalothorax: Propeltidium 1.66 mm
Page 79 and 80:
Male adult unknown.Immature paratyp
Page 81 and 82:
IV: trochanter 1.20 (1.10); femur 3
Page 83 and 84:
Cokendolpher, 1.C. 1981. The order
Page 85 and 86:
Gertsch, W.J. 1992. Distribution pa
Page 87 and 88:
same families and genera, but also
Page 89 and 90:
species from the United States and
Page 91 and 92:
the posterior median pair short and
Page 93 and 94:
great many species of North America
Page 95 and 96:
Key to the Eyed Females1. Eight eye
Page 97 and 98:
39111012Figs. 1-12.-Ventral and dor
Page 99 and 100:
1419 23Figs. 13-24.-Ventral and dor
Page 101 and 102:
27 293334Figs. 25-36.-Ventral and d
Page 103 and 104:
Figs. 37-48.-Ventral and retrolater
Page 105 and 106:
Cicurina blanco, new speciesFigs. 7
Page 107 and 108:
Type-data.-Female holotype from ins
Page 109 and 110:
Description.-Female holotype: Lengt
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
lengths: first femur 2 rom, fourth
Page 115 and 116:
Cicurina pablo, new speciesFigs. 10
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
canal in nearly vertical posItion;
Page 121 and 122:
Cicurina vespera, new speciesFigs.
Page 123 and 124:
procurved canal across sac; connect
Page 125 and 126:
Cicurina caverna, new speciesFigs.
Page 127 and 128:
with sac of similar size set in obl
Page 129 and 130:
February 1964 (J. Reddell, D. McKen
Page 131 and 132:
County: Diamond Cave, 16 August 196
Page 133 and 134:
Roth, V.D. 1992. A new and first tr
Page 135 and 136:
LITERATURE CITEDBarr, T.C. 1963. Ec
Page 137 and 138:
Muchmore, W.B. 1992. Cavernicolous
Page 139 and 140:
Species of Aphrastochthonius are kn
Page 141 and 142:
FAMILY NEOBISIIDAE CHAMBERLINGenus
Page 143 and 144:
trochanter 2.5 (2.6), femur 5.55 (5
Page 145 and 146:
ottom of entrance pit, Ogle Cave (O
Page 147 and 148:
tactile seta on tibia and basitarsu
Page 149 and 150:
Missouri may be conspecific (unpubl
Page 151 and 152:
Trichobothriotaxy of chela generall
Page 153 and 154:
Female (figures given first for all
Page 155 and 156:
transverse furrows; eyespots not ev
Page 157 and 158:
Reddell and W. Russell); I female f
Page 159 and 160:
and Acuminochernes, along with the
Page 161 and 162:
Chamberlin, J.C. 1946. The genera a
Page 163:
(0.36); chela (without pedicel) 2.0
Page 167 and 168:
although not recently studied is no
Page 169 and 170:
and stylar outgrowths, present in s
Page 171 and 172:
in Phalangodes (et al.) is thick an
Page 173 and 174:
pairs) are found in six species: T.
Page 175 and 176:
elated species IS probably best int
Page 177 and 178:
legs than expected (2.6-3.2). This
Page 179 and 180:
~ 3.3 are synapomorphic); all trogl
Page 181 and 182:
TAXONOMYTEXELLA Goodnight and Goodn
Page 183 and 184:
14. BK absent (Figs. 177, 180). SA
Page 185 and 186:
Figs. 8-11.-Texella bijUrcata (Brig
Page 187 and 188:
Description.-Total body length, 1.5
Page 189 and 190:
male examined closely has fewer set
Page 191 and 192:
Figs. 26-29.-Texella kokoweej, new
Page 193 and 194:
apical region which loses the apica
Page 195 and 196:
Figs. 38-41.-Texella shoshone, new
Page 197 and 198:
Distribution.-Known only from the t
Page 199 and 200:
Figs. 52-55.-Texella brevistyla, ne
Page 201 and 202:
Texellajungi, new speciesFigs. 60-7
Page 203 and 204:
Figs. 66-69.-Texellajungi, new spec
Page 205 and 206:
than S; SA with laterobasal carina
Page 207 and 208:
~81//J/'/ ;'?/ ~~.........--~~I, II
Page 209 and 210:
cylindrical, retina and cornea abse
Page 211 and 212:
Figs. 93-96.-Texella cokendolpheri,
Page 213 and 214:
SA with well developed prong and re
Page 215 and 216:
Figs. 105-108.-Texelia mulaiki Good
Page 217 and 218:
and McCarty Caves, which are known
Page 219 and 220:
Color orange. Body of medium rugosi
Page 221 and 222:
Notes.-The type locality was errone
Page 223 and 224:
Figs. 128-131.-Taella reyesi, new s
Page 225 and 226:
Figs. 136-139.-Texella reyesi, new
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
1989 (W. Elliott, J. Reddell, and M
Page 233 and 234:
Table 3.-Continued.# locality sex S
Page 235 and 236:
mesoapical; patella, 2 mesal; tibia
Page 237 and 238:
Figs. 162-165.-Texella gmbbsi, new
Page 239 and 240:
Figs. 166-169.-Texella diplospina,
Page 241 and 242:
Figs. 174-177.-Texella renkesae, ma
Page 243 and 244:
Figs. 178-18\.-Teulla spinoperca, n
Page 245 and 246:
Distribution.-Known only from Fayet
Page 247 and 248:
Figs. 190-193.-Texellafendi, new sp
Page 249 and 250:
CLASSIFICAnONTexellabifurcata group
Page 251 and 252:
Chandler, D.S. 1992. The Pselaphida
Page 253 and 254:
Key to Species1. Abdominal segments
Page 255 and 256:
stemite VI slightly impressed at ba
Page 257 and 258:
vertexal carinae, and the laterally
Page 259 and 260:
is associated with rotten woods (Ch
Page 261 and 262:
small ventral carina near base, pro
Page 263:
Grigarick, A.A., and R.O. Schuster.
Page 266 and 267:
Cicurifla (Cicurella) holsiflgeri G
show all

searchable PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?