primarily troglomorphic, characters: eyes absent;0-1 pairs of AT; PTb with 2 mesal megaspines;LIIISL ~ 9.4; TC ~ 3-6-4-5 or 4-5-5-5. Males arefurther distinguished by the following genitaliccharacters: PSL subrectangular, folded; SA withlaterobasal carina bearing a short prong or tubercle;apical half of S a straight tube (Figs. 85-88, 93-96,102, 105-108).Species.-The three species show increasingtroglomorphism from T. hardelli to T. cokelldolpherito T. mulaiki. This cline is also reflected intwo genitalic characters associated with the SA. InT. hardeni, the SA has the largest carina and shortestteeth; these states are reversed in T. mulaiki andintermediate in T. cokelldolpheri. As pronged SAare found in virtually all species of the subgroup,and carinae absent in many, the loss of the prongs(Figs. 87, 88) seems to be derived.Range.-Known only from central Texas (Maps3,4).Texella hardeni, new speciesFigs. 85-88.Diagnosis.-This strongly troglomorphic speciesis most closely related to T. mulaiki and T. cokelldolpherifrom which it may be distinguished by itssomewhat lower TC (leg I with only three tarsomeres)and shorter legs (LII/SL = 9.9-11.6) andby its glans characters: PSL with dorsoapical spine,SA prong reduced to a short knob (Figs. 87, 88).Type.-Male holotype from Haby Salamander<strong>Cave</strong>, Bandera County, Texas (31 Oct. 1984; S.Harden and J. Ivy), deposited in CAS.Etymology.-The specific name is a patronym inhonor of Mr S. J. Harden, one of the collectors ofthe holotype.Description.-Total body length, 1.23-1.67.Scute length, 0.95-1.18. Leg II length, 11.0-11.9.Leg II1Scute length, 9.9-11.6. (N = 3).Color pale orange, appendages lighter. Bodyfinely rugose; with several pointed tubercles anteriorlyon eye mound; with few tubercles on parsthoracica; with tergite margins smooth; with coxa Ibearing row of setate tubercles, coxae 2-4 smooth.Carapace with 1 pair of small AT. Eye mound anarrowed cone, somewhat cylindrical, retina andcornea absent. Palpal megaspines: trochanter, twoventral; femur, one (female) or two (male) mesoapical;patella, two mesal; tibia, two mesal. Tarsalcount: 3-6 to 8-4-5.Male (holotype): Total body length, 1.67. Scutelength, 1.18; width, 1.08. Eye mound length, 0.26;width,0.26. Leg II length, 11.72. TrIV with vestigialspur, length, 0.02. POP absent.Penis (Figs. 85-88): VPP with 2 dorsal, 16 lateral,and 6 ventral setae; lateral setae short, dorsaland ventral setae long; AS short, apically entire.Glans: BK conical; ML not evident; PSL subquadrate,folded, with dorsoapical prong. S with apicalhalf straight, lacking ornamentation; BF present; SAwith a broad lateral expansion and an apical knob.Female (paratopotype): Total body length, 1.46.Scute length, 1.13; width, 1.03. Eye mound length,0.23; width, 0.21. Leg II length, 11.92. TrIVlacking ventral tubercle.Ovipositor lacking apical teeth.Natural History.-AII populations occur sympatricallywith Hoplobunus species (Gonyleptoidea).Other Material Examined (Paratypes).- UNITED STATES: Texas: Bandera Co.: Haby Salamander<strong>Cave</strong>, 31 Oct. 1984 (S. Harden and J. Ivy,TMM), 1 female; 20 July 1986 (S. Harden, TMM),1 female; Station "COO <strong>Cave</strong>, 4 Sep. 1988 (P.Sprouse, TMM), 1 juvenile. KelT Co.: Stowers<strong>Cave</strong>, 20 Mar. 1965 (1. Reddell, TMM), 1 juvenile.Distribution.-Known definitely only from HabySalamander <strong>Cave</strong>, Bandera County, Texas (Maps2-4).Note.-The juvenile specimens from Station "C"<strong>Cave</strong> and Stowers <strong>Cave</strong> are assigned to this speciesonly tentatively.Texella cokendolpheri, new speciesFigs. 89-100.Diagnosis.-This strongly troglomorphic speciesis most closely related to T. mulaiki and T. hardellifrom which it may be distinguished by its glanscharacters: PSL lacking dorsoapical spine and SAwith lateral prong and apically serrated carina (Figs.93-96).Type.-Male holotype from Robber Baron <strong>Cave</strong>,San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas (3 Apr. 1982;A. Grubbs), deposited in CAS.Etymology.-The specific name is a patronym inhonor of Mr James C. Cokendolpher, who first recognizedthis species as new.Description.-Total body length, 1.28-1.67.Scute length, 1.05-1.28. Leg II length, 13.1-13.6.Leg II1Scute length, 11.1-12.9. (N = 5).Color pale orange. Body finely rugose; withseveral pointed tubercles anteriorly on eye mound;with few tubercles on pars thoracica; with tergitemargins smooth; with coxa I bearing row of setatetubercles, coxae 2-4 smooth. Carapace with 1 pairof AT. Eye mound a narrowed cone, somewhat198
cylindrical, retina and cornea absent. Palpal megaspines:trochanter, one ventral; femur, one mesoapical;patella, one mesal; tibia, two mesal. Tarsalcount: 4-6 to 8-5-5.Male (holotype): Total body length, 1.28. Scutelength, 1.05; width, 0.92. Eye mound length, 0.20;width, 0.20. Leg II length, 13.4. TrIV spur vestigial,length, 0.02. POP length, 0.06.Penis (Figs. 93-96): VPP with medium-sized setaelaterally, long setae ventrally and dorsally; with2 dorsal, 13 lateral, and 4 ventral setae. Glans:BK small; ML small; PSL ventrally notched. S withapical half straight, tube-like; BF well developed;SA with lateral tooth and serrate carina.Female (paratopotype): Total body length, 1.33.Scute length, 1.18; width, 1.05. Eye mound length,0.18; width, 0.20. Leg II length, 13.1. TrIVlacking ventral tubercle.Ovipositor (Figs. 98, 100): cuticle intricatelyfolded, lacking microspines or tubercles; apical teethabsent.Other Material Examined (Paratypes).- UNITED STATES: Texas: Bexar Co.: Robber Baron<strong>Cave</strong>, 10 Mar. 1982 (A. Grubbs, B. Steele, and R.Waters, TMM, CAS), 2 females; 6 Apr. 1983 (R.Waters, CAS), 1 male; Jan 1984 (R. Waters,TMM), 1 female; John Wagner Ranch <strong>Cave</strong> No.3,25 Jan. 1985 (S. Harden, TMM), 1 juvenile.Distribution.-Known from cave(s) in BexarCounty, Texas (Maps 2-4).Note.-The juvenile specimen from John WagnerRanch <strong>Cave</strong> No.3 is assigned to this species onlytentatively.Texella mulaiki Goodnight and GoodnightFigs. 3,4, 101-112.Texella mulaiki Goodnight and Goodnight, 1942: 10(female holotype from Hays County, Texas, inAMNH, examined). Goodnight and Goodnight,1967:6. Reddell, 1965: 177. Mitchell and Reddell,1971:46. Davis, 1979:34.Diagnosis.-This strongly troglomorphic speciesis most closely related to T. cokendolpheri and T.hardeni from which it may be distinguished by itsglans characters: PSL lacking dorsoapical spine andII I\ I....... _J185Figs. 85-88.-Tex-ella hardeni, new species, male holotype: 85-86, penis, lateral view; 87, penis, dorsal view; 88, glans, ventralsurface. Scale bar = 0.50 mm <strong>for</strong> Fig. 85 and 0.25 mm <strong>for</strong> the others.199
- Page 7 and 8:
PREFACEThe present volume is the se
- Page 9:
TABLE OF CONTENTSHOLSINGER, JOHN R.
- Page 12 and 13:
the state of Coahuila in northern M
- Page 14 and 15:
Fig. 2.-Anesia welboumi, new specie
- Page 16 and 17:
\\. \ - -' ..........---~\ I// --..
- Page 18 and 19:
Mexiweckelia hardeni, new speciesFi
- Page 20:
2 sets of 1 or 2 setae each; dactyl
- Page 23 and 24:
AFig. 7.-Holsingerius smaragdinus,
- Page 25 and 26:
have as many setae on the inner pla
- Page 28:
Antenna 1 about 33 % length of body
- Page 31 and 32:
Of biogeographic interest for the h
- Page 33 and 34:
Bowman, T .E. 1992. Two subterranea
- Page 35 and 36:
A note by Scott Harden that accompa
- Page 37 and 38:
~~..~ ~~ I))\\ "-,'.=bFig. 3.-Speoc
- Page 39 and 40:
unarmed, except in pleopod 2, which
- Page 41 and 42:
Cokendolpher, LC., and l.R. Reddell
- Page 43 and 44:
lobes. The larger setae vary greatl
- Page 45 and 46:
the relationships of the order and
- Page 47 and 48:
zomids their absence is considered
- Page 49 and 50:
some species could be either split,
- Page 51 and 52:
have small pores over the surface o
- Page 53 and 54:
inhabits tropical deciduous forest
- Page 55 and 56:
huitvnolotitlensis from A. stygius
- Page 57 and 58:
8-10, figs. 5-7; Rowland, 1973c:136
- Page 59 and 60:
(in row) and one pair large posteri
- Page 61 and 62:
(0.34); tarsus 0.64 (0.58); total 4
- Page 63 and 64:
Abdomen: Tergite I with two pairs a
- Page 65 and 66:
setae near posterior margin. stemit
- Page 67:
setae, and ten ventral setae. Stemi
- Page 71 and 72:
1,980 m elev., 26 Dec. 1986 (T. Tre
- Page 73 and 74:
asitarsal-tarsal proportions: 15:4:
- Page 75 and 76:
and one pair setae at base of proce
- Page 77 and 78:
Cephalothorax: Propeltidium 1.66 mm
- Page 79 and 80:
Male adult unknown.Immature paratyp
- Page 81 and 82:
IV: trochanter 1.20 (1.10); femur 3
- Page 83 and 84:
Cokendolpher, 1.C. 1981. The order
- Page 85 and 86:
Gertsch, W.J. 1992. Distribution pa
- Page 87 and 88:
same families and genera, but also
- Page 89 and 90:
species from the United States and
- Page 91 and 92:
the posterior median pair short and
- Page 93 and 94:
great many species of North America
- Page 95 and 96:
Key to the Eyed Females1. Eight eye
- Page 97 and 98:
39111012Figs. 1-12.-Ventral and dor
- Page 99 and 100:
1419 23Figs. 13-24.-Ventral and dor
- Page 101 and 102:
27 293334Figs. 25-36.-Ventral and d
- Page 103 and 104:
Figs. 37-48.-Ventral and retrolater
- Page 105 and 106:
Cicurina blanco, new speciesFigs. 7
- Page 107 and 108:
Type-data.-Female holotype from ins
- Page 109 and 110:
Description.-Female holotype: Lengt
- Page 111 and 112:
Description.-Female holotype: Lengt
- Page 113 and 114:
lengths: first femur 2 rom, fourth
- Page 115 and 116:
Cicurina pablo, new speciesFigs. 10
- Page 117 and 118:
Description.-Female holotype: Lengt
- Page 119 and 120:
canal in nearly vertical posItion;
- Page 121 and 122:
Cicurina vespera, new speciesFigs.
- Page 123 and 124:
procurved canal across sac; connect
- Page 125 and 126:
Cicurina caverna, new speciesFigs.
- Page 127 and 128:
with sac of similar size set in obl
- Page 129 and 130:
February 1964 (J. Reddell, D. McKen
- Page 131 and 132:
County: Diamond Cave, 16 August 196
- Page 133 and 134:
Roth, V.D. 1992. A new and first tr
- Page 135 and 136:
LITERATURE CITEDBarr, T.C. 1963. Ec
- Page 137 and 138:
Muchmore, W.B. 1992. Cavernicolous
- Page 139 and 140:
Species of Aphrastochthonius are kn
- Page 141 and 142:
FAMILY NEOBISIIDAE CHAMBERLINGenus
- Page 143 and 144:
trochanter 2.5 (2.6), femur 5.55 (5
- Page 145 and 146:
ottom of entrance pit, Ogle Cave (O
- Page 147 and 148:
tactile seta on tibia and basitarsu
- Page 149 and 150:
Missouri may be conspecific (unpubl
- Page 151 and 152:
Trichobothriotaxy of chela generall
- Page 153 and 154:
Female (figures given first for all
- Page 155 and 156:
transverse furrows; eyespots not ev
- Page 157 and 158: Reddell and W. Russell); I female f
- Page 159 and 160: and Acuminochernes, along with the
- Page 161 and 162: Chamberlin, J.C. 1946. The genera a
- Page 163: (0.36); chela (without pedicel) 2.0
- Page 167 and 168: although not recently studied is no
- Page 169 and 170: and stylar outgrowths, present in s
- Page 171 and 172: in Phalangodes (et al.) is thick an
- Page 173 and 174: pairs) are found in six species: T.
- Page 175 and 176: elated species IS probably best int
- Page 177 and 178: legs than expected (2.6-3.2). This
- Page 179 and 180: ~ 3.3 are synapomorphic); all trogl
- Page 181 and 182: TAXONOMYTEXELLA Goodnight and Goodn
- Page 183 and 184: 14. BK absent (Figs. 177, 180). SA
- Page 185 and 186: Figs. 8-11.-Texella bijUrcata (Brig
- Page 187 and 188: Description.-Total body length, 1.5
- Page 189 and 190: male examined closely has fewer set
- Page 191 and 192: Figs. 26-29.-Texella kokoweej, new
- Page 193 and 194: apical region which loses the apica
- Page 195 and 196: Figs. 38-41.-Texella shoshone, new
- Page 197 and 198: Distribution.-Known only from the t
- Page 199 and 200: Figs. 52-55.-Texella brevistyla, ne
- Page 201 and 202: Texellajungi, new speciesFigs. 60-7
- Page 203 and 204: Figs. 66-69.-Texellajungi, new spec
- Page 205 and 206: than S; SA with laterobasal carina
- Page 207: ~81//J/'/ ;'?/ ~~.........--~~I, II
- Page 211 and 212: Figs. 93-96.-Texella cokendolpheri,
- Page 213 and 214: SA with well developed prong and re
- Page 215 and 216: Figs. 105-108.-Texelia mulaiki Good
- Page 217 and 218: and McCarty Caves, which are known
- Page 219 and 220: Color orange. Body of medium rugosi
- Page 221 and 222: Notes.-The type locality was errone
- Page 223 and 224: Figs. 128-131.-Taella reyesi, new s
- Page 225 and 226: Figs. 136-139.-Texella reyesi, new
- Page 227 and 228: Figs. 144-147.-Texella reyesi, new
- Page 229 and 230: Figs. 152-155.-Texella reyesi, new
- Page 231 and 232: 1989 (W. Elliott, J. Reddell, and M
- Page 233 and 234: Table 3.-Continued.# locality sex S
- Page 235 and 236: mesoapical; patella, 2 mesal; tibia
- Page 237 and 238: Figs. 162-165.-Texella gmbbsi, new
- Page 239 and 240: Figs. 166-169.-Texella diplospina,
- Page 241 and 242: Figs. 174-177.-Texella renkesae, ma
- Page 243 and 244: Figs. 178-18\.-Teulla spinoperca, n
- Page 245 and 246: Distribution.-Known only from Fayet
- Page 247 and 248: Figs. 190-193.-Texellafendi, new sp
- Page 249 and 250: CLASSIFICAnONTexellabifurcata group
- Page 251 and 252: Chandler, D.S. 1992. The Pselaphida
- Page 253 and 254: Key to Species1. Abdominal segments
- Page 255 and 256: stemite VI slightly impressed at ba
- Page 257 and 258: vertexal carinae, and the laterally
- Page 259 and 260:
is associated with rotten woods (Ch
- Page 261 and 262:
small ventral carina near base, pro
- Page 263:
Grigarick, A.A., and R.O. Schuster.
- Page 266 and 267:
Cicurifla (Cicurella) holsiflgeri G