12.07.2015 Views

Comparative Syntax of the Balkan Languages (Oxford ... - Cryptm.org

Comparative Syntax of the Balkan Languages (Oxford ... - Cryptm.org

Comparative Syntax of the Balkan Languages (Oxford ... - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

186 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOUIn (58) <strong>the</strong> complement <strong>of</strong> F2 hosting <strong>the</strong> adjectival determiner is an XP, orminimally an NP, containing a pro with <strong>the</strong> same features as <strong>the</strong> noun drejtori:Such a structure was proposed by Dobrovie-Sorin (1987) in her analysis <strong>of</strong>Rumanian genitives like those in (59):(59) prieten al regeluifriend-MASC'friend <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> king'a-DEF.MASC.SG king-DEF.MASC.SGwhich are <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same sort as those <strong>of</strong> Albanian (<strong>the</strong> Romanian element al in(59) corresponds to <strong>the</strong> element i <strong>of</strong> an Albanian example like (54a), discussed inthis section). However, <strong>the</strong> structure in (58) enhances a problem already presentin <strong>the</strong> structure in (57). Within a DP, <strong>the</strong>re is a <strong>the</strong>matic relation between <strong>the</strong>noun whose extended projection <strong>the</strong> DP is and a genitive included in that DP. Ina representation <strong>of</strong> genitives along <strong>the</strong> lines <strong>of</strong> (57) or (58), an element, <strong>the</strong>adjectival determiner that, crucially, does not belong to <strong>the</strong> extended projection<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> noun in <strong>the</strong> genitive mediates and, from <strong>the</strong> point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> a principlelike <strong>the</strong> Principle <strong>of</strong> Full Interpretation (Chomsky 1986b), "disturbs" this <strong>the</strong>maticrelation.Grosu (1988), in his analysis <strong>of</strong> Romanian genitives, analyzes <strong>the</strong> Romanianelement al as a head in <strong>the</strong> main structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> DP containing <strong>the</strong> genitiveDP, similar to what I propose here in (56a) for <strong>the</strong> corresponding Albanian elementi. Also, <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> Aromanian genitives in Androutsopoulou (1998) isin <strong>the</strong> same spirit as that <strong>of</strong> Albanian genitives in this section.In sum, on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> discussion in this section, we can conclude thatan analysis <strong>of</strong> Albanian adjectival determiners along <strong>the</strong> lines in (56a) is preferableto that in (57). Because <strong>the</strong> morphemes appearing before <strong>the</strong> adjective in exampleslike (22b) (cf. (22a)) and before genitives in examples like (54) (cf.(56a)) are identical, we would not want to have <strong>the</strong>m base generated in two differentpositions. Thus, <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> Albanian adjectival determiners proposedin this essay (cf. (22a)) is preferable to that in (43).10.2. GreekIn contrast to Albanian, Greek does not allow for overt adjectival determinerswith genitives. That is, an example corresponding to <strong>the</strong> Albanian one in (54a),where an adjectival determiner precedes <strong>the</strong> genitive, is ungrammatical:(60) a.*o SiefBindis<strong>the</strong>-MASC.NOM principal-MASC. NOMtu<strong>the</strong>-GEN.NEUsxoliu'<strong>the</strong> school principal'school-GEN.NEUb. o Siefdindis ton sxoliuo<strong>the</strong>-MASC.NOM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!