Comparative Syntax of the Balkan Languages (Oxford ... - Cryptm.org

More documents

Recommendations

Info

IS BALKAN COMPARATIVE SYNTAX POSSIBLE? 43Schaller, H. 1975. Die Balkansprachen: Eine Einfiilining in die Balkanphilologie.Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Schaller, H. 1977. Bibliographie -ur Balkanphilologie. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Terzi, A. 1992. "PRO in Finite Clauses: A Study of the Inflectional Heads of theBalkan Languages." Ph.D. diss., CUNY.Thrasher R. H., Jr. 1974. "Shouldn't Ignore These Strings: A Study of ConversationalDeletion." Ph.D. diss. University of Michigan.Thumb, A. 1964. A Handbook of the Modern Creek Language: Grammar, Texts,Glossary. Chicago: Argonaut. Reprint of 1912 ed.Topolinjska, Z. 1995. Macedonian Dialects in the Aegean Part of Macedonia, Book 1:Syntax, Volume I. Skopje: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts.Tsitsipis, L. 1981. "Language Change and Language Death in Albanian SpeechCommunities in Greece: A Sociolinguistic Study." Ph.D. diss., University ofWisconsin.Van Windekens. A. J. 1976. Le tokharien confronte avec les autres langues indoeuropeennes.Vol. 1: La phonelique el le vocabulaire. Louvain: CentreInternational de Dialectologie Generale.Veloudis, 1. 1982. "Negation in Modern Greek." Ph.D. diss., University of Reading.Wackernagel, J. 1892. "Uber ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung."Indogermanische Forschungen 1.333-436.Weerman, F. 1989. The V2 Conspiracy: A Synchronic and a Diachronic Analysis ofVerbal Positions in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Zwicky, A. M., and G. K. Pullum. 1983. "Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n't."Language 59.502-13.Zwicky, A. M. 1987. "Suppressing the Z's." Journal of Linguistics 23.133-48.
3Head-to-Head Mergein Balkan Subjunctives and LocalityCarmen Dobrovie-Sorin1. IntroductionThe data to be analyzed below belong to three types of constructions, which areheld to be syntactically distinct in GB analyses: control, raising to subject, andobviation. Extending Dobrovie-Sorin's (1994. chap. 4) analysis of Romanian tothe other Balkan languages, I will argue that the data support a unified analysisalong the lines of Koster (1978, 1984, 1987), who proposes that the samesyntactic configuration, namely anaphoric binding, underlies both control andsubject raising. The phenomenon referred to as obviation can also be restated interms of anaphoric binding.Insofar as it unifies control and subject raising, Koster's GB analysis isconceptually close to minimalist analyses such as those of Hornstein (to appear)and Manzini and Roussou (1998). The difference between the two models obviouslytriggers different implementations. Thus, within GB, it is anaphoric bindingthat provides the common basis that allows us to unify bound anaphora (inparticular control) and NP movement (in particular subject raising). Withinminimalism, on the other hand, anaphoric binding has no theoretical status, andthe relevant empirical generalizations are restated in terms of the Attract/Moveoperation. The two implementations will be thoroughly compared.Balkan subjunctives' allow their subject DP to enter into a local relationwith an argument of the main clause. Compare the subjunctive clauses ofRomance languages other than Romanian, which block such a relation. The distinguishingbehavior of Balkan subjunctives will be shown to be due to theirparticular constituent structure, which can be more adequately represented withinbare phrase structure (Chomsky 1994) than within X'-theory (Chomsky 1986).As a result of our investigation, we will be able to circumscribe the propertiesthat Balkan subjunctives have in common with the infinitives of Germanicand Romance languages. It seems natural to believe that it is precisely theseproperties that allowed the Balkan subjunctive to replace the infinitive."44
Page 2 and 3: Comparative Syntax of Balkan Langua
Page 4 and 5: Comparative Syntax ofBalkan Languag
Page 6 and 7: Contents1 Introduction 3Maria Luisa
Page 9 and 10: This page intentionally left blank
Page 11 and 12: 4 MARIA LU1SA RIVERO AND ANGELA RAL
Page 13 and 14: 6 MARIA LUISA RIVERO AND ANGELA RAL
Page 15 and 16: 8 MARIA LUISA RIVERO AND ANGELA RAL
Page 17 and 18: 10 MARIA LUIS A RIVERO AND ANGELA R
Page 19 and 20: 12 MARIA LUISA RIVERO AND ANGELA RA
Page 25 and 26: 18 BRIAN D. JOSEPHsubjects are perm
Page 27 and 28: 20 BRIAN D. JOSEPH(1) Pan-Balkan Cl
Page 29 and 30: 22 BRIAN D. JOSEPHd. Alb perpiqem t
Page 31 and 32: 24 BRIAN D. JOSEPHIf similarities i
Page 33 and 34: 26 BRIAN D. JOSEPHdepends on what o
Page 35 and 36: 28 BRIAN D. JOSEPHe. introducer of
Page 37 and 38: 30 BRIAN D. JOSEPHi." Mi ta xerja s
Page 39 and 40: 32 BRIAN D. JOSEPHspecial propertie
Page 41 and 42: 34 BRIAN D. JOSEPHc. *John did defi
Page 43 and 44: 36BRIAN D. JOSEPH(14)PositiveNegati
Page 45 and 46: 38 BRIAN D. JOSEPHthe German term n
Page 47 and 48: 40 BRIAN D. JOSEPH28. I find Zwicky
Page 49: 42 BRIAN D. JOSEPHJoseph, B. D. 199
Page 53 and 54: 46 CARMEN DOBROVIE-SORIN2.1. Contro
Page 55 and 56: 48 CARMEN DOBROVIE-SORINanaphoric s
Page 57 and 58: 50 CARMEN DOBROVIE-SORINb. E greu s
Page 59 and 60: 52 CARMEN DOBROVIE-SORINconfigurati
Page 61 and 62: 54 CARMEN DOBROVIE-SORIN(19) a. Jua
Page 63 and 64: 56 CARMEN DOBROVIE-SORINb. Doresc c
Page 65 and 66: 58 CARMEN DOBROVIE-SORIN(27)In orde
Page 67 and 68: 60 CARMEN DOBROVIE-SORINb. *Bonibel
Page 69 and 70: 62 CARMEN DOBROVIE-SORINOne may won
Page 71 and 72: 64CARMEN DOBROVIE-SORIN(d)Neg has a
Page 73 and 74: 66 CARMEN DOBROVIE-SORIN(43) a. Ion
Page 75 and 76: 68 CARMEN DOBROVIE-SORIN(47) A feat
Page 77 and 78: 70 CARMEN DOBROVIE-SORINand NP rais
Page 79 and 80: 72 CARMEN DOBROVIE-SORINReferencesA
Page 81 and 82: 4Control and Raisingin and out of S
Page 83 and 84: 76 ANNA ROUSSOUb. Voglio an da re.
Page 85 and 86: 78 ANNA ROUSSOUlatridou (1993) cons
Page 87 and 88: 80 ANNA ROUSSOUignore the propertie
Page 89 and 90: 82 ANNA ROUSSOU2.2. Mood and comple
Page 91 and 92: 84 ANNA ROUSSOU(1992b), namely the
Page 93 and 94: 86 ANNA ROUSSOUpurposes it suffices
Page 95 and 96: 88 ANNA ROUSSOUextend to raising pr
Page 97 and 98: 90 ANNA ROUSSOULet us now go back t
Page 99 and 100: 92 ANNA ROUSSOU(33) Ta pedja fenond
Page 101 and 102:
94 ANNA ROUSSOU(37) a. I tried (*fo
Page 103 and 104:
96 ANNA ROUSSOU(41) O Janis deli (i
Page 105 and 106:
98 ANNA ROUSSOURoberts (1996) argue
Page 107 and 108:
100 ANNAROUSSOU7. Sportiche (1997)
Page 109 and 110:
102ANNAROUSSOUChomsky, N. 1986. Bar
Page 111 and 112:
104 ANNAROUSSOURoberts, I. 1996. "T
Page 113 and 114:
106 ILIYANA KRAPOVAterms of binding
Page 115 and 116:
108 ILIYANA KRAPOVAsubset (as in (4
Page 117 and 118:
110 ILIYANA KRAPOVAstrictly differe
Page 119 and 120:
112 ILIYANA KRAPOVA2.3. PRO subject
Page 121 and 122:
114 ILIYANA KRAPOVAThe fact that co
Page 123 and 124:
116 ILIYANA KRAPOVAadverb vcera 'ye
Page 125 and 126:
118 ILIYANA KRAPOVAillustrated in (
Page 127 and 128:
120 ILIYANA KRAPOVA(34) a. Iskain d
Page 129 and 130:
122 ILIYANA KRAPOVAmovement of na+V
Page 131 and 132:
124 ILIYANA KRAPOVA13. It has been
Page 133 and 134:
126 ILIYANA KRAPOVARivero, M. L. 19
Page 135 and 136:
128 DALINA KALLULLIprcsuppositional
Page 137 and 138:
130 DALINA KALLULLImoment, let us j
Page 139 and 140:
132 DDALINAKALLULLIb. den pijeno me
Page 141 and 142:
134 DALINA KALLULLId. What did Ana
Page 143 and 144:
136 DALINA KALLULLIb. O Janis (*ta)
Page 145 and 146:
138 DALINA KALLULLIHowever, the fac
Page 147 and 148:
140DALINA KALLULLIb. Anna hat das B
Page 149 and 150:
142 DALINA KALLULLIWhile definite a
Page 151 and 152:
144 DALINA KALLULLIWhat are the fac
Page 153 and 154:
146 DALINA KALLULLIproperties. The
Page 155 and 156:
148 DALINA KALLULLIobjects, are in
Page 157 and 158:
150 DALINA KALLULLIIn this section
Page 159 and 160:
152 DALINA KALLULLI(62) a. weil ich
Page 161 and 162:
154 DALINA KALLULLI7. Albanian and
Page 163 and 164:
156 DALINA KALLULLIpresumably respo
Page 165 and 166:
158 DALINA KALLULLI47. In the Princ
Page 167 and 168:
160 DALINA KALLULLIRaposo, E. 1997.
Page 169 and 170:
162 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOUpreposit
Page 171 and 172:
164 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOUd.e.f.va
Page 173 and 174:
166 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOU(20) a.
Page 175 and 176:
168 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOUcal feat
Page 177 and 178:
170 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOUwhich is
Page 179 and 180:
172 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOU(iii)(iv
Page 181 and 182:
174 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOUThe Alba
Page 183 and 184:
176 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOUOn the o
Page 185 and 186:
178 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOU(42) a.b
Page 187 and 188:
180ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOU(43)(44)I
Page 189 and 190:
182 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOUshown in
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
186 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOUIn (58)
Page 195 and 196:
188 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOUto D). D
Page 197 and 198:
190 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOU(3)That
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
194 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOUadjectiv
Page 203 and 204:
196 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOU(ii) ena
Page 205 and 206:
198 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOU24. It i
Page 207 and 208:
8Last Resort and V Movementin Balka
Page 209 and 210:
202 MARIA LUISA RIVEROthey need not
Page 211 and 212:
204 MARIA LUISA RIVEROterms and is
Page 213 and 214:
206 MARIA LUISA RIVERO(8) a.b.Kogaw
Page 215 and 216:
208 MARIA LUISA RIVEROthat the orde
Page 217 and 218:
210 MARIA LUIS A RIVEROfeature must
Page 219 and 220:
212 MARIA LUIS A RIVEROThe restrict
Page 221 and 222:
214 MARIA LUIS A RIVERO3. Greek in
Page 223 and 224:
216 MARIA LUIS A RIVEROmovement in
Page 225 and 226:
218 MARIA LUISA RIVEROThe equivalen
Page 227 and 228:
220 MARIA LUISA RIVERObecause it sh
Page 229 and 230:
222 MARIA LUISA RIVEROHolmbcrg, A.
Page 231 and 232:
This page intentionally left blank
Page 233 and 234:
226 NAME INDEXFarkas, D., 8,54,57,7
Page 235 and 236:
This page intentionally left blank
Page 237 and 238:
230 SUBJECT INDEXbare output condit
Page 239 and 240:
232 SUBJECT INDEXindividual-denotin
Page 241:
234 SUBJECT INDEXsubjuntive operato
show all

Comparative Syntax of the Balkan Languages (Oxford ... - Cryptm.org

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?