12.07.2015 Views

Comparative Syntax of the Balkan Languages (Oxford ... - Cryptm.org

Comparative Syntax of the Balkan Languages (Oxford ... - Cryptm.org

Comparative Syntax of the Balkan Languages (Oxford ... - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ADJECTIVAL DETERMINERS IN ALBANIAN AND GREEK 191(6) a/to to vivliothis <strong>the</strong> book'this book'In Alexiadou and Wilder's account, it is unclear what in (2b) motivates <strong>the</strong>movement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> adjective kalo to Spec, CP. I understand <strong>the</strong> movement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>noun to Spec, D/PP in (3) as being <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same kind as <strong>the</strong> movement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>noun to Spec, CP in relative clauses (cf. (1)). The noun moves to Spec, D/PPso that <strong>the</strong> identification relation holding between <strong>the</strong> adjective and <strong>the</strong> noun canbe licensed (cf. <strong>the</strong> relevant discussion in section 5).Second, Alexiadou and Wilder's generalization in (30) (Alexiadou andWilder, 1999.319), <strong>the</strong> major argument for <strong>the</strong>ir analysis, repeated here as (7):(7) An adjective permits DS only if it can be used predicatively.appears to be incorrect in view <strong>of</strong> examples like those in (8) and (9):(8) a. o kaimenos o mathitis<strong>the</strong> pitiable <strong>the</strong> student'<strong>the</strong> pitiable student'b. *aftos o mathitis ine kaimenosthis <strong>the</strong> student is pitiable"This student is pitiable.'(9) a. o proighoumenos o prothipourghos<strong>the</strong> former <strong>the</strong> prime minister'<strong>the</strong> former prime minister'b. *aftos o prothipourghos ine proighoumenosthis <strong>the</strong> prime minister is former'this prime minister is former'The adjectives kaimenos 'pitiable' and proighoumenos 'former' appear in determinerspreading contexts, as can be seen in (8a) and (9a), but <strong>the</strong>y cannot beused predicatively, as it can be seen in (8b) and (9b), respectively. Consequently,examples like those in (8) and (9) must be explained away if one is to maintain,as Alexiadou and Wilder do, that in determiner spreading contexts <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> adjectives is a DP-internal BE predication, and, fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, that what differentiates(2d) from (5) above is that in (2d), <strong>the</strong> adjective is base generated postnominallyin a predication configuration, with <strong>the</strong> noun being <strong>the</strong> subject and<strong>the</strong> adjective being <strong>the</strong> predicate (cf. (2c)), whereas in (5), <strong>the</strong> adjective is generatedprenominally, as in (10):(10)25[DP <strong>the</strong> [ good [ book }]]"Third, a major point in Alexiadou and Wilder's work is that <strong>the</strong> two modes<strong>of</strong> adjectival modification exemplified in (2a) and (5) have completely differentstructures and are dissociated from one ano<strong>the</strong>r. By dissociating <strong>the</strong> two types <strong>of</strong>adjectival modification, fu<strong>the</strong>r exemplified in (1 la) and (11b) 2( ':

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!