12.07.2015 Views

Comparative Syntax of the Balkan Languages (Oxford ... - Cryptm.org

Comparative Syntax of the Balkan Languages (Oxford ... - Cryptm.org

Comparative Syntax of the Balkan Languages (Oxford ... - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

188 ANTONIA ANDROUTSOPOULOUto D). Differences in <strong>the</strong> ordering <strong>of</strong> constituents within <strong>the</strong> DP between <strong>the</strong> twolanguages can be accounted for in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> category <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> preposed XP,which contains <strong>the</strong> noun (cf. section 7). Raising <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> noun to D is obligatoryin Albanian, while raising <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> noun to D/PP is optional in Greek (cf. section9).Appendix 1In this appendix, I wish to refer briefly to two pieces <strong>of</strong> data introduced but notdiscussed in <strong>the</strong> main text:(a) <strong>the</strong> fact that in Albanian, <strong>the</strong> adjectival determiner surfaces after anadverbial modifying <strong>the</strong> adjective, as in examples like (16a) in <strong>the</strong> text, repeatedhere as (1):(1) dome<strong>the</strong>nie jashte'zakonisht re mad hesignificance-lNDEF unusually DET great"unusually great significance'(b) Albanian adjectival determiners obligatorily precede articulated adjectives(cf. note 3), even in predicative position, as in examples like (l0b) in <strong>the</strong>text, repeated here as (2):(2) Mesuesiteacher-DEFishtewasThe teacher was happy.'iDETlutmur.happyExamples like (1) would seem to indicate that in <strong>the</strong> structure in (23a), an extraprojection should be made available between DP and D/PP. This, however, isincompatible with <strong>the</strong> main proposal in <strong>the</strong> text, as depicted in (23a). Thus, itseems to me that examples like (1) suggest an analysis <strong>of</strong> adverbial modificationalong <strong>the</strong> following lines: <strong>the</strong> adverb is generated under a projection, say AdvP,and <strong>the</strong> modified adjective, along with <strong>the</strong> adjectival determiner te, moves to occupy<strong>the</strong> specifier <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> projection complement <strong>of</strong> Adv:(3) [^ypjashte'zakonisht t [[ reunusuallyDETinadhe]- } tj ]]greatso that adverbial modification can be licensed. The piece <strong>of</strong> structure comprised<strong>of</strong> AdvP and its complement projection should be generated higher than a DP. asin (4):(4) [pp dome<strong>the</strong>niesignificanceED/PPte DETmadhe .. .]]greatand (1) be derived through movement <strong>of</strong> D/PP to <strong>the</strong> specifier <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> complement<strong>of</strong> Adv and remnant movement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole DP to Spec, AdvP (cf. (3)). Inthis case, we would have to assume that <strong>the</strong> adverb occupies <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> AdvPand that <strong>the</strong> target <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> remnant DP movement is <strong>the</strong> specifier <strong>of</strong> AdvP.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!