12.07.2015 Views

Asian Transformations in Action - Api-fellowships.org

Asian Transformations in Action - Api-fellowships.org

Asian Transformations in Action - Api-fellowships.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

164 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONGLOBALIZATION, INFLUENCE AND RESISTANCE: CINEMATICREPRESENTATIONS AND EXPERIENCE IN JAPAN AND THAILANDKrisnadi Yuliawan SaptadiIntroductionBen Okri, a Nigerian writer, once said that if anyonewants to conquer a nation, first they have to <strong>in</strong>vade theirstories. Sometimes, when we talk about globalization,many people believe that Hollywood, with all itsblockbusters, has already done exactly what Okri said.As Wim Wenders, a famous German film director,once said to his fellow Germans, “The Americans havecolonized our subconscious.”The feel<strong>in</strong>gs represented <strong>in</strong> Okri’s and Wenders’statements are the reason why Hollywood is oftencriticized for overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g global audiences with“American culture.” In the eyes of the world, Hollywoodis America. It represents not only the glamour ofAmerican movie stars, but also their “soft power”—what many see as the cultural imperialism—of theworld’s lone superpower.It is a fact that although Hollywood produces only a smallfraction of the world’s feature films, it garners about 75percent of theatrical motion picture revenues and evenmore of the video rentals and purchases. Moreover,despite some twists and turns <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual years,the long-term trend has clearly favored Hollywood’s<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g dom<strong>in</strong>ation. Hollywood’s proportion of theworld market is double what it was <strong>in</strong> 1990, while theEuropean film <strong>in</strong>dustry is one-n<strong>in</strong>th of the size it was <strong>in</strong>1945. Further, <strong>in</strong> Western Europe <strong>in</strong> 1985, 41 percentof the film tickets purchased were for Hollywood films;by 1995, however, the figure was 75 percent.Start<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2000, Hollywood films generally hadgreater box office sales outside the United States thanat home. Eighteen such films took <strong>in</strong> over USD100million <strong>in</strong>ternationally, a total not matched by anyfilm produced outside the United States. While therewas an <strong>in</strong>terloper <strong>in</strong> 2001 (the Japan animated filmSpirited Away took <strong>in</strong> over USD200 million), it was theexception that proved the rule, as the top 10 films at thebox office <strong>in</strong> 2001 were all Hollywood products. Theglobal situation <strong>in</strong> years after was no different.Historically, <strong>Asian</strong> markets have not been verysignificant for Hollywood. They have not generatedas much revenue for the studios as have European andLat<strong>in</strong> American markets. However, this began to change<strong>in</strong> the 1980s and especially the 1990s. Nowadays,Hollywood movies take about 96 percent of box officereceipts <strong>in</strong> Taiwan, about 78 percent <strong>in</strong> Thailand andabout 65 percent <strong>in</strong> Japan.A number of factors have contributed to the growthof <strong>Asian</strong> film markets and to Hollywood’s <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gdom<strong>in</strong>ation of them. Trade liberalization has allowedmany more Hollywood movies to come <strong>in</strong>to <strong>Asian</strong>theaters, and economic growth has given more people themeans to see them. The build<strong>in</strong>g of modern multiplexeshas dramatically <strong>in</strong>creased the number of venues forfilm exhibition, while the privatization of televisionand the development of new distribution technologiessuch as video, cable and satellite have created whole newmarkets for film beyond the theatres.While the distribution-exhibition sectors of <strong>Asian</strong>film <strong>in</strong>dustries have welcomed this market expansion,the production sectors have not always been soenthusiastic, <strong>in</strong>sofar as multiplexes and the newhome-based enterta<strong>in</strong>ment outlets tend to fill up withHollywood films. Hollywood’s economic, <strong>in</strong>stitutionaland political power gives it a competitive advantage thatfew <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> the world can match: only Hollywoodcan afford to spend USD200 million on a s<strong>in</strong>gle film;only Hollywood has the global distribution networkand publication powers that can get its movies <strong>in</strong>totheaters worldwide; and only Hollywood has the USgovernment beh<strong>in</strong>d it, push<strong>in</strong>g to open foreign marketseven further.As markets around the world expanded and as Hollywoodclaimed a bigger and bigger portion, the logical th<strong>in</strong>ghappened: Hollywood studios began to earn more oftheir money outside of the US than they did <strong>in</strong>side.From the 1950s through the 1970s, Hollywood earnedabout 30 percent of its money overseas. That percentagebegan to climb <strong>in</strong> the 1980s and today the averagestudio production earns well over 50 percent of itsrevenue abroad. That number is expected to grow overtime, with some <strong>in</strong>dustry figures predict<strong>in</strong>g the foreignshare of box office earn<strong>in</strong>gs could rise to 80 percentwith<strong>in</strong> the next 20 years. This means that Hollywood is<strong>Asian</strong> <strong>Transformations</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Action</strong>The Work of the 2006/2007 API Fellows

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!