CIRCLES OF POWER AND COUNTERBALANCES 17when there are Muslim and non-Muslim communities.The books also discuss what k<strong>in</strong>d of rights people whoare adm<strong>in</strong>istered by a Muslim ruler have under Islamiclaw. On the other hand, Ali Abd al-Raziq (1998, 32),an ulama from Egypt who was labeled an <strong>in</strong>fidel (kafîr)due to his ideas about secularization <strong>in</strong> Islam, claims<strong>in</strong> his book al-Islâm wa Ushûl Hukm (1972) that “theGlorious Qur’an supports the view that the Prophet,peace upon him, had noth<strong>in</strong>g to do with political k<strong>in</strong>gship,Qur’anic verses are <strong>in</strong> agreement that his heavenly workdid got go beyond the Message, which is free of allmean<strong>in</strong>gs of authority.”However, there is an argument that the state <strong>in</strong> Islamcan be approached by root<strong>in</strong>g the concept of daulah asenunciated <strong>in</strong> the al-Qur’an <strong>in</strong> how it was first practicedby the Prophet Muhammad through his establishmentof a state <strong>in</strong> his era at Mad<strong>in</strong>ah. Jastaniah has identifiedsome characteristics of Muhammad as a Prophet of Islamand a leader of Muslims and non-Muslims <strong>in</strong> religiousand secular affairs. It is also reported that the ProphetMuhammad promulgated the al-Dustûr al-Madînah(Constitution of Madînah), which conta<strong>in</strong>s forty-sevenarticles. There are many lessons on the establishmentof a state from this constitution. First, the people ofMad<strong>in</strong>ah came from many tribes, ancestries, culturesand religion. Second, this constitution aimed to <strong>org</strong>anizeMuslims and non-Muslims <strong>in</strong> one state under a Muslimruler (the Prophet Muhammad) through brotherhood.Third, the state safeguarded freedom for all religions <strong>in</strong>Mad<strong>in</strong>ah city. Fourth, all citizens were equal under theConstitution (Sukarja 1995, 191-4).The issue of the Islamic state was discussed <strong>in</strong> Islamicdiscourse dur<strong>in</strong>g the 20 th century when Muslimk<strong>in</strong>gdoms were <strong>in</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e, not only <strong>in</strong> the Middle Eastbut also <strong>in</strong> Southeast Asia. Regard<strong>in</strong>g the reasons forthis decl<strong>in</strong>e, Hefner (2000, 3) says that “the first hasbeen the diffusion of democratic ideas to disparatepeoples and cultures around the world. The second isthe turn of the millennium that has seen the forcefulreappearance of ethnic and religious issues <strong>in</strong> publicaffairs.” He also ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s that “the end of the twentiethcentury demonstrated conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>gly that high modernistreports of the demise of religion and ethnicity were…premature” (Hefner 2000, 3). To respond to this trend,three groups of Islamic political thought arose regard<strong>in</strong>gthe issue of the relationship between Islam and thestate. The first is the conservative group of peoplewho want to <strong>in</strong>tegrate Islam and the state because,accord<strong>in</strong>g to this paradigm, Islam provides an Islamicsocial system from the al-Qur’an and Sunnah (prophets’tradition). This group is divided <strong>in</strong>to two sections: thetraditionalist group that believes that Muslims shouldfollow the classical Islamic political tradition and thesecond, fundamentalist group that is eager to returnto the al-Qur’an and Sunnah totally, with no roomfor the ijtihâd (Islamic legal reason<strong>in</strong>g). It seems theybelieve that the Ijtihâd gate (<strong>in</strong>sidâd bâb al-Ijtihâd) isclosed for Muslims. In Federspiel’s (2001, ix) words“…fundamentalists …rejected the secular concept ofthe nation-state and called for the establishment of astate and society structured to implement its conceptsof Islamic values.”The second group is the modernists. Deliar Noerma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s that the modernists recognize only theQur’an and Hadîts as the basic sources of their ideasand thought. They propose that “the gate of ijtihâd isstill open and rejected the idea of taqlid” (Noer 1985,120; Noer 1973). In Southeast Asia, <strong>in</strong> countries likeIndonesia, Malaysia and Brunei Darussalam, thisgroup played a major role after World War II <strong>in</strong> theestablishment of state blue pr<strong>in</strong>ts. Historically, thisgroup came from the Islamic reformist movementdur<strong>in</strong>g the colonial era. They were named the kaummuda (young generation), who promoted reformistideas from the Middle East <strong>in</strong> opposition to the kaumtua (old generation), who ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed traditional Islamwith<strong>in</strong> Muslim society. The proposal of this group isthat Muslims may have certa<strong>in</strong> rules or concepts onthe establishment of an [Islamic] state, but they arepermitted to adapt other systems such Western ideas onpolitical affairs. Kurzman (2002, 4) ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s that “thismovement was the self-conscious adoption of ‘modern’values—that is, values…associated with the modernworld, especially rationality, science, constitutionalismand certa<strong>in</strong> forms of human equality.”The third group is the secularists who argue that Islamand the state should be separated. This group is alsocalled liberal Islam. In Islamic political thought, theseparation of religion and politics was promoted byKemal Ataturk of Turkey, ‘Ali Abd Raziq of Egypt andSoekarno of Indonesia. Suffice it to say that emerg<strong>in</strong>gnation-states among Muslim countries were <strong>in</strong>fluencedby secularist ideas (Smith 1970, 97-6).In last decade, there are many types of Muslim countrieswhich fall <strong>in</strong> the above categories. Choudhury (1993,95-6) has categorized Muslim countries by governance.First, there some Muslim states like Afghanistan, Iran,Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Sudan which designatethemselves as Islamic states. Second, there are the vastmajority of Muslim countries which do not claim to beIslamic states; there are references to Islam sometimes<strong>in</strong> a form such as ‘state religion.’ These countries aregoverned ma<strong>in</strong>ly by Western legal codes but <strong>in</strong> personal<strong>Asian</strong> <strong>Transformations</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Action</strong>The Work of the 2006/2007 API Fellows
18CIRCLES OF POWER AND COUNTERBALANCESmatters such as marriage, <strong>in</strong>heritance etc., Islamic lawor syarî‘ah is implemented. Third, there are a very fewMuslim countries which prefer to have a ‘secular state’on the pattern of the Western concept of the separationof politics and religion. J.N.D Anderson, <strong>in</strong> his IslamicLaw <strong>in</strong> the Modern World, classifies the legal systems ofthe Muslim world today: (1) those that still considerthe sharî‘ah as the fundamental law and still practiceit to a certa<strong>in</strong> extent <strong>in</strong> their countries; (2) those thathave abandoned the sharî‘ah and become secular; (3)those have reached some compromise between thesestwo position (Anderson 1959, 83).It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to look at various def<strong>in</strong>itions of Islamiclaw. Joseph Schacht, for example, def<strong>in</strong>es this law as:The epitome of Islamic thought, the most typicalmanifestation of the Islamic way of life, the coreand kernel of Islam itself. The very term fiqh,‘knowledge’, shows that early Islam regardedknowledge of the sacred law as the knowledge parexcellence (Schacht 1964, 1).The terms fiqh and sharî‘ah have similar mean<strong>in</strong>gs. Fiqhis used <strong>in</strong> the literal sense to mean “understand<strong>in</strong>g” (alfahm).Basically, the mean<strong>in</strong>g of the term fiqh is usuallysimilar to words such as ‘ilm (knowledge) and kalâm(theology). The term ‘ilm has the same mean<strong>in</strong>g, and<strong>in</strong> the era of the Prophet there appears to have beenno difference between the two terms. Accord<strong>in</strong>g toNyazee, “as sophistication crept <strong>in</strong>, the term ‘ilm cameto be applied <strong>in</strong> a narrow sense to mean knowledge thatcomes through report, that is, traditions: hadith andathar. The term fiqh….came to be used exclusively fora knowledge of the law” (Nyazee 1994, 21). Thus theterms ‘ilm and fiqh were separated when specialization<strong>in</strong> law and tradition came <strong>in</strong>to existence toward the endof the first century of Hijrah.Furthermore, the terms kalâm and fiqh were notseparated until the time of al-Ma’mun (d.218 A.H.).Fiqh previously had embraced both theologicalproblems and legal issues. That is why Abu Hanifah(d. 150 A.H.) def<strong>in</strong>ed fiqh as “ma‘rîfah al-nafs mâ lahâwa mâ ‘alayhâ (understand<strong>in</strong>g the self <strong>in</strong> terms of one’srights and duties)” (Dahlan 1997, 333). This meansthat fiqh concerns understand<strong>in</strong>g Muslims’ rights andobligations. However, when the Mu‘tazilah (an Islamictheology group) began to use the term kalâm for theirteach<strong>in</strong>g, the term fiqh came to be restricted to thecorpus of Islamic law. This differentiation has seriousimplications for the study of Islamic law.There are many def<strong>in</strong>itions of fiqh. Abdul WahhabKhalaf (1978, 11) def<strong>in</strong>es fiqh as: “al-‘ilm bi ak-ahkâmal-sharî‘ah al-‘amâliyyah al-muktasib m<strong>in</strong> adillatihâ altafshiliyyah(the knowledge of the legal rules perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gto conduct that have been derived from specificevidence).” Khallaf also highlights another def<strong>in</strong>itionof fiqh as: “majmû‘ât al-ahkâm al-sharî‘ah al-‘amâliyyahal-mustafadah m<strong>in</strong> adillatihâ al-tafshiliyyah (thecompilation of the legal rules perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to conductthat have been derived from specific evidence)” (1978,12). It can also be def<strong>in</strong>ed as a “statement concern<strong>in</strong>gthe understand<strong>in</strong>g of the speaker of the mean<strong>in</strong>g of hisspeech” (‘ibârah ‘an fahmi gharadhî al-mutakallimunm<strong>in</strong> kalamihi) (M<strong>in</strong>haji 2001, 94). It is perhaps safeto say that fiqh is the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of Islamic law from thema<strong>in</strong> sources (Qur’an and Sunna) through ijtihâd. Theperson who looks at the law is called mujtahid and thisprocess is termed ijtihâd. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of thisactivity is called fiqh al-Islamî or Islamic law (al-ahkâmal-Islâmiyyah).The term sharî‘ah means the source of dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water.For Arabic people, sharî‘ah means religion, ath-tharîqahal-mustaqimah (the right way), and an-nusûs almuqaddas(sacred texts) from the Qur’an and Sunnah(Dahlan 1997, 335). Schacht says that sharî‘ah is “thesacred law of Islam.” He goes further, say<strong>in</strong>g that, “It isan all-embrac<strong>in</strong>g body of religious duties, the totality ofAllah’s commands that regulate the life of every Muslim<strong>in</strong> all aspects; it consists of ord<strong>in</strong>ances regard<strong>in</strong>g worshipand ritual, as well as political and (<strong>in</strong> the narrow sense)legal rules” (Schacht 1964, 1).In other cases, scholars differentiate between shariahand fiqh. First, while sharî‘ah comes from Allah, fiqhis the product of human <strong>in</strong>terpretation. Second,there is only one sharî‘ah, while fiqh implies diversity.Third, sharî‘ah is very authoritative while fiqh is veryliberal, s<strong>in</strong>ce it is a human product. Fourth, sharî‘ahis not subject to change; on the contrary, fiqh facesmany changes through socio-cultural dynamics. Fifthand f<strong>in</strong>ally, shari’ah is idealistic while fiqh is realistic.To clarify, I mean to say that Islamic law is fiqh, notshari’ah. In this context, fiqh as human <strong>in</strong>terpretationhas produced Islamic law or the Islamic legal system.There are at least four types of Islamic legal literature:kutûb al-fiqhiyyah (books on Islamic jurisprudence),decrees of the Islamic courts, the laws and regulationsof Muslim countries and fatwa (legal pronouncementsof jurisconsult) (Mudzhar 1998, 80).Discourse of Islamic State and Islamic Law <strong>in</strong>MalaysiaIn this section I will discuss the <strong>in</strong>terpretation of<strong>Asian</strong> <strong>Transformations</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Action</strong>The Work of the 2006/2007 API Fellows
- Page 1 and 2: Asian Transformations in ActionThe
- Page 3 and 4: iiiCONTENTSAbout the BookAcknowledg
- Page 5 and 6: V. APPENDICESCultivation of Transfo
- Page 7 and 8: The Regional Project, entitled “C
- Page 9 and 10: ixTHE CONTRIBUTORS(in alphabetical
- Page 11 and 12: MYFEL JOSEPH PALUGA is a faculty me
- Page 13 and 14: xiiiare common to nations around th
- Page 15 and 16: xvsilence maintained by academe on
- Page 17 and 18: xviiIt is reasonable and necessary,
- Page 19 and 20: xixOVERVIEWCzarina Saloma-Akpedonu,
- Page 21 and 22: xxito retain their identity but at
- Page 23 and 24: xxiiiABOUT THE WORKSHOPThe 6 th API
- Page 25 and 26: 2CIRCLES OF POWER AND COUNTERBALANC
- Page 27 and 28: 4CIRCLES OF POWER AND COUNTERBALANC
- Page 29 and 30: 6CIRCLES OF POWER AND COUNTERBALANC
- Page 31 and 32: 8CIRCLES OF POWER AND COUNTERBALANC
- Page 33 and 34: 10CIRCLES OF POWER AND COUNTERBALAN
- Page 35 and 36: 12CIRCLES OF POWER AND COUNTERBALAN
- Page 37 and 38: 14CIRCLES OF POWER AND COUNTERBALAN
- Page 39: 16CIRCLES OF POWER AND COUNTERBALAN
- Page 43 and 44: 20CIRCLES OF POWER AND COUNTERBALAN
- Page 45 and 46: 22CIRCLES OF POWER AND COUNTERBALAN
- Page 47 and 48: 24CIRCLES OF POWER AND COUNTERBALAN
- Page 49 and 50: 26 PERSISTENT PROBLEMS, PROMISING S
- Page 51 and 52: 28CIRCLES OF POWER AND COUNTERBALAN
- Page 53 and 54: 30 PERSISTENT PROBLEMS, PROMISING S
- Page 55 and 56: 32 PERSISTENT PROBLEMS, PROMISING S
- Page 57 and 58: 34 PERSISTENT PROBLEMS, PROMISING S
- Page 59 and 60: 36 PERSISTENT PROBLEMS, PROMISING S
- Page 61 and 62: 38 PERSISTENT PROBLEMS, PROMISING S
- Page 63 and 64: 40 PERSISTENT PROBLEMS, PROMISING S
- Page 65 and 66: 42 PERSISTENT PROBLEMS, PROMISING S
- Page 67 and 68: 44 PERSISTENT PROBLEMS, PROMISING S
- Page 69 and 70: 46 PERSISTENT PROBLEMS, PROMISING S
- Page 71 and 72: 48 PERSISTENT PROBLEMS, PROMISING S
- Page 73 and 74: 50 PERSISTENT PROBLEMS, PROMISING S
- Page 75 and 76: 52 PERSISTENT PROBLEMS, PROMISING S
- Page 77 and 78: 54 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 79 and 80: 56 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 81 and 82: 58 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 83 and 84: 60 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 85 and 86: 62 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 87 and 88: 64 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 89 and 90: 66 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 91 and 92:
68 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 93 and 94:
70 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 95 and 96:
72 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 97 and 98:
74 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 99 and 100:
76 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 101 and 102:
78 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 103 and 104:
80 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 105 and 106:
82 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 107 and 108:
84 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 109 and 110:
86 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 111 and 112:
88 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 113 and 114:
90 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 115 and 116:
92 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 117 and 118:
94 INTERMINGLING OF CONTINUITY AND
- Page 119 and 120:
96 BLURRED BORDERS AND SOCIAL INTEG
- Page 121 and 122:
98 BLURRED BORDERS AND SOCIAL INTEG
- Page 123 and 124:
100 BLURRED BORDERS AND SOCIAL INTE
- Page 125 and 126:
102 BLURRED BORDERS AND SOCIAL INTE
- Page 127 and 128:
104 BLURRED BORDERS AND SOCIAL INTE
- Page 129 and 130:
106 BLURRED BORDERS AND SOCIAL INTE
- Page 131 and 132:
108 BLURRED BORDERS AND SOCIAL INTE
- Page 133 and 134:
110 BLURRED BORDERS AND SOCIAL INTE
- Page 135 and 136:
112 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 137 and 138:
114 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 139 and 140:
116 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 141 and 142:
118 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 143 and 144:
120 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 145 and 146:
122 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 147 and 148:
124 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 149 and 150:
126 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 151 and 152:
128 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 153 and 154:
130 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 155 and 156:
132 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 157 and 158:
134 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 159 and 160:
136 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 161 and 162:
138 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 163 and 164:
140 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 165 and 166:
142 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 167 and 168:
144 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 169 and 170:
146 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONo
- Page 171 and 172:
148 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONa
- Page 173 and 174:
150 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONc
- Page 175 and 176:
152 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONs
- Page 177 and 178:
154 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONA
- Page 179 and 180:
156 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONB
- Page 181 and 182:
158 REFIGURATION OF IDENTITIES AND
- Page 183 and 184:
160 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONa
- Page 185 and 186:
162 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONb
- Page 187 and 188:
164 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONG
- Page 189 and 190:
166 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONh
- Page 191 and 192:
168 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONL
- Page 193 and 194:
170 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONv
- Page 195 and 196:
172 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONT
- Page 197 and 198:
174 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONR
- Page 199 and 200:
176 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONa
- Page 201 and 202:
178 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONp
- Page 203 and 204:
180 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONt
- Page 205 and 206:
182 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONA
- Page 207 and 208:
184 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONN
- Page 209 and 210:
186 SPECIFICITIES OF GLOBALIZATIONI
- Page 211 and 212:
188 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTThe repor
- Page 213 and 214:
190 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTregistry
- Page 215 and 216:
192 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTPublic di
- Page 217 and 218:
194 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTConstrain
- Page 219 and 220:
196 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTEmpowerme
- Page 221 and 222:
198 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTshugyou c
- Page 223 and 224:
200 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTSenge and
- Page 225 and 226:
202 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTof an int
- Page 227 and 228:
204 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTWheatley,
- Page 229 and 230:
206 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTtogether
- Page 231 and 232:
208 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTmonitorin
- Page 233 and 234:
210 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTDevelopme
- Page 235 and 236:
212 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTgovernmen
- Page 237 and 238:
214 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTREDEFININ
- Page 239 and 240:
216 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTthe maxim
- Page 241 and 242:
218 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTwork, to
- Page 243 and 244:
220 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTcontinue
- Page 245 and 246:
222 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTspaces, a
- Page 247 and 248:
224 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTACADEMIC
- Page 249 and 250:
226 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTwe consum
- Page 251 and 252:
228 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTI took wi
- Page 253:
230 COLLAGES OF BETTERMENTFourth, t
- Page 256 and 257:
233Day 3, Tuesday, 27 November 2007
- Page 258 and 259:
JOSIE M. FERNANDEZExecutive Council
- Page 260 and 261:
237MARY RACELISProfessorial Lecture
- Page 262 and 263:
239NAPAT TANGAPIWUTInstitute of Asi
- Page 264 and 265:
Persistent problems, promising solu
- Page 266 and 267:
Blurred borders and social integrat
- Page 268 and 269:
the basis of local identity and exa
- Page 270 and 271:
a certain Western perspective while
- Page 272 and 273:
strategy found their way into a bus