Asian Transformations in Action - Api-fellowships.org
Asian Transformations in Action - Api-fellowships.org
Asian Transformations in Action - Api-fellowships.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COLLAGES OF BETTERMENT 217proved advantageous <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g trad<strong>in</strong>g activities. Atpresent, Bangkok’s sois are def<strong>in</strong>ed as areas where peoplelive. They recreate a village (Pichard-Bertaux 1999) andstill serve as a communication venue where<strong>in</strong> a veryrich street life culture can be observed. With<strong>in</strong> Manila’sbarangays, alleys serve as liv<strong>in</strong>g spaces, common spacesfor socialization and spillover spaces where they servevarious functions such a place to relax and sit and enjoyrecreational activities.Figure 1: The above photos show pathways along the differentenclaves: <strong>in</strong> Kampung Ciumbuleuit, Bandung where onlypedestrians are allowed access (left), <strong>in</strong> Manila which featureselevated wooden planks along esteros (right) and <strong>in</strong> Bangkok’ssoi where pedestrians are usually greeted with food stalls (center).The typical <strong>in</strong>ner city dwell<strong>in</strong>gs are still present <strong>in</strong> thethree cities. Figure 1 shows three typical access pathswith<strong>in</strong> these settlements.Street culture <strong>in</strong> Bandung, Bangkok and ManilaThe historic parts of the cities of Bandung, Bangkokand Manila reflect strong traditional knowledgesystems, especially <strong>in</strong> the morphological developmentof their street space. These systems may providealternative <strong>in</strong>sights that would reconnect urban designproposals with the cultural context so as to be able tospatially express localism. The section reiterates thatunderstand<strong>in</strong>g the socio-cultural history and <strong>in</strong>digenousknowledge of a group is a prerequisite to improv<strong>in</strong>gpedestrian transport policy and provision given that adifferent culture requires a different treatment of spaceto be able to match it with users’ needs and desires.History of walk<strong>in</strong>gThe walk<strong>in</strong>g culture <strong>in</strong> Asia has a long history andan overview of transport development will prove itspresence. The walk<strong>in</strong>g period <strong>in</strong> <strong>Asian</strong> cities may bedef<strong>in</strong>ed as the period prior to motorization. The precolonialera and the early colonial period <strong>in</strong> bothIndonesia and the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es were characterizedby a predom<strong>in</strong>antly walk<strong>in</strong>g society while the premodernizationperiod of Bangkok was a comb<strong>in</strong>ation ofwater-based transport and walk<strong>in</strong>g, which <strong>in</strong>fluenced theurban pattern of the area. There was a limited numberof roads, which were usually narrow and unpaved.Town centers had compact urban structures with verydense, <strong>in</strong>tensively mixed land use. The structures werelow-rise (two to three levels), dictat<strong>in</strong>g a pedestrianscale urban form. Build<strong>in</strong>g materials were made upof impermanent products such as wood, bamboo andpalm leaves, illustrat<strong>in</strong>g the impermanence of <strong>Asian</strong>traditional structures. Residences <strong>in</strong> special quarterswere close to each other, located either along the towncenter or waterways. Travel distances were short. In the1970s, walk<strong>in</strong>g was still a major mode of transport formost of Asia (Barter and Raad 2000). The percent ofnon-motorized trips <strong>in</strong> select cities dur<strong>in</strong>g the last twodecades of the 20th century shows that walk<strong>in</strong>g stillconstituted a large percentage of the overall trips <strong>in</strong>Asia (e.g., 40 percent <strong>in</strong> Jakarta, 20 percent <strong>in</strong> Manila)(Barter 2000). However, this percentage is slowlydecreas<strong>in</strong>g because of efforts to <strong>in</strong>crease motor vehicletraffic, a lack of pedestrian facilities and a worsen<strong>in</strong>genvironment.Purpose of walk<strong>in</strong>gWalk<strong>in</strong>g is considered the most basic mode oftransportation given that all travels usually start andend with a walk<strong>in</strong>g segment. However, similar toother modes, walk<strong>in</strong>g is a derived demand given thatthe decision to walk is highly motivated by achiev<strong>in</strong>ga purpose such as to get to a dest<strong>in</strong>ation or to realizea goal.Walk<strong>in</strong>g may also be considered as a spiritual exercise.In some countries, such as Edo-period Japan, travel<strong>in</strong>gwas only allowed if it was for the purpose of spiritualexercise, such as go<strong>in</strong>g on a pilgrimage to visit holyplaces, shr<strong>in</strong>es and temples, oftentimes located <strong>in</strong>outly<strong>in</strong>g areas. In contemporary Manila, a tradition thathas been passed on is the religious procession, which isconducted through walk<strong>in</strong>g. The slow pace of walk<strong>in</strong>grelative to other modes (i.e., <strong>in</strong>side a vehicle) providestime to meditate, absorb and commune with one’ssurround<strong>in</strong>g environment. This <strong>in</strong>creases the <strong>in</strong>timacyand <strong>in</strong>volvement of the <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong> relation to his/herenvirons and allows a person to become attuned to his/her humanity.Street space consumptionStreet users may be considered consumers of spaceas they undergo certa<strong>in</strong> activities. Some of the ma<strong>in</strong>motivations to use streets <strong>in</strong>clude: (1) utilitarian—to<strong>Asian</strong> <strong>Transformations</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Action</strong>The Work of the 2006/2007 API Fellows