12.07.2015 Views

Asian Transformations in Action - Api-fellowships.org

Asian Transformations in Action - Api-fellowships.org

Asian Transformations in Action - Api-fellowships.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COLLAGES OF BETTERMENT 217proved advantageous <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g trad<strong>in</strong>g activities. Atpresent, Bangkok’s sois are def<strong>in</strong>ed as areas where peoplelive. They recreate a village (Pichard-Bertaux 1999) andstill serve as a communication venue where<strong>in</strong> a veryrich street life culture can be observed. With<strong>in</strong> Manila’sbarangays, alleys serve as liv<strong>in</strong>g spaces, common spacesfor socialization and spillover spaces where they servevarious functions such a place to relax and sit and enjoyrecreational activities.Figure 1: The above photos show pathways along the differentenclaves: <strong>in</strong> Kampung Ciumbuleuit, Bandung where onlypedestrians are allowed access (left), <strong>in</strong> Manila which featureselevated wooden planks along esteros (right) and <strong>in</strong> Bangkok’ssoi where pedestrians are usually greeted with food stalls (center).The typical <strong>in</strong>ner city dwell<strong>in</strong>gs are still present <strong>in</strong> thethree cities. Figure 1 shows three typical access pathswith<strong>in</strong> these settlements.Street culture <strong>in</strong> Bandung, Bangkok and ManilaThe historic parts of the cities of Bandung, Bangkokand Manila reflect strong traditional knowledgesystems, especially <strong>in</strong> the morphological developmentof their street space. These systems may providealternative <strong>in</strong>sights that would reconnect urban designproposals with the cultural context so as to be able tospatially express localism. The section reiterates thatunderstand<strong>in</strong>g the socio-cultural history and <strong>in</strong>digenousknowledge of a group is a prerequisite to improv<strong>in</strong>gpedestrian transport policy and provision given that adifferent culture requires a different treatment of spaceto be able to match it with users’ needs and desires.History of walk<strong>in</strong>gThe walk<strong>in</strong>g culture <strong>in</strong> Asia has a long history andan overview of transport development will prove itspresence. The walk<strong>in</strong>g period <strong>in</strong> <strong>Asian</strong> cities may bedef<strong>in</strong>ed as the period prior to motorization. The precolonialera and the early colonial period <strong>in</strong> bothIndonesia and the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es were characterizedby a predom<strong>in</strong>antly walk<strong>in</strong>g society while the premodernizationperiod of Bangkok was a comb<strong>in</strong>ation ofwater-based transport and walk<strong>in</strong>g, which <strong>in</strong>fluenced theurban pattern of the area. There was a limited numberof roads, which were usually narrow and unpaved.Town centers had compact urban structures with verydense, <strong>in</strong>tensively mixed land use. The structures werelow-rise (two to three levels), dictat<strong>in</strong>g a pedestrianscale urban form. Build<strong>in</strong>g materials were made upof impermanent products such as wood, bamboo andpalm leaves, illustrat<strong>in</strong>g the impermanence of <strong>Asian</strong>traditional structures. Residences <strong>in</strong> special quarterswere close to each other, located either along the towncenter or waterways. Travel distances were short. In the1970s, walk<strong>in</strong>g was still a major mode of transport formost of Asia (Barter and Raad 2000). The percent ofnon-motorized trips <strong>in</strong> select cities dur<strong>in</strong>g the last twodecades of the 20th century shows that walk<strong>in</strong>g stillconstituted a large percentage of the overall trips <strong>in</strong>Asia (e.g., 40 percent <strong>in</strong> Jakarta, 20 percent <strong>in</strong> Manila)(Barter 2000). However, this percentage is slowlydecreas<strong>in</strong>g because of efforts to <strong>in</strong>crease motor vehicletraffic, a lack of pedestrian facilities and a worsen<strong>in</strong>genvironment.Purpose of walk<strong>in</strong>gWalk<strong>in</strong>g is considered the most basic mode oftransportation given that all travels usually start andend with a walk<strong>in</strong>g segment. However, similar toother modes, walk<strong>in</strong>g is a derived demand given thatthe decision to walk is highly motivated by achiev<strong>in</strong>ga purpose such as to get to a dest<strong>in</strong>ation or to realizea goal.Walk<strong>in</strong>g may also be considered as a spiritual exercise.In some countries, such as Edo-period Japan, travel<strong>in</strong>gwas only allowed if it was for the purpose of spiritualexercise, such as go<strong>in</strong>g on a pilgrimage to visit holyplaces, shr<strong>in</strong>es and temples, oftentimes located <strong>in</strong>outly<strong>in</strong>g areas. In contemporary Manila, a tradition thathas been passed on is the religious procession, which isconducted through walk<strong>in</strong>g. The slow pace of walk<strong>in</strong>grelative to other modes (i.e., <strong>in</strong>side a vehicle) providestime to meditate, absorb and commune with one’ssurround<strong>in</strong>g environment. This <strong>in</strong>creases the <strong>in</strong>timacyand <strong>in</strong>volvement of the <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong> relation to his/herenvirons and allows a person to become attuned to his/her humanity.Street space consumptionStreet users may be considered consumers of spaceas they undergo certa<strong>in</strong> activities. Some of the ma<strong>in</strong>motivations to use streets <strong>in</strong>clude: (1) utilitarian—to<strong>Asian</strong> <strong>Transformations</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Action</strong>The Work of the 2006/2007 API Fellows

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!