30.11.2012 Views

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Epistemological Questions 99<br />

The mashshå˘¥ doctr<strong>in</strong>e concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellect and <strong>in</strong>tuition can<br />

be summarized by say<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>re are degrees of <strong>in</strong>tellect that are<br />

atta<strong>in</strong>ed as man advances <strong>in</strong> knowledge with <strong>the</strong> aid of <strong>the</strong> Active<br />

Intellect. As <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellect grows <strong>in</strong> strength and universality, it beg<strong>in</strong>s<br />

<strong>to</strong> acquire functions and powers that are identified with <strong>in</strong>tuition ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than <strong>in</strong>tellect <strong>in</strong> its analytical function connected with <strong>the</strong> act of ratioc<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />

The means of acquir<strong>in</strong>g metaphysical knowledge is, accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>to</strong> Ibn S¥nå, <strong>in</strong>tellectual <strong>in</strong>tuition by which ta‘aqqul should perhaps<br />

be translated ra<strong>the</strong>r than mere ratioc<strong>in</strong>ation. But by <strong>in</strong>tuition here we<br />

mean not a sensual or biological power that leaps <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dark but a<br />

power that illum<strong>in</strong>ates and removes <strong>the</strong> boundaries of reason and <strong>the</strong><br />

limitations of <strong>in</strong>dividualistic existence.<br />

In traditional <strong>Islamic</strong> sources <strong>the</strong> mashshå˘¥ school is usually called<br />

“÷ikmah ba÷thiyyah” (“rational philosophy” or more precisely “argumentative<br />

philosophy”) <strong>in</strong> contrast <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> ishråq¥ school, which is called<br />

“÷ikmah dhawqiyyah” (“<strong>in</strong>tuitive or literally tasted philosophy”) and<br />

where <strong>in</strong>tuition is identified with <strong>the</strong> direct “tast<strong>in</strong>g” of reality and<br />

illum<strong>in</strong>ation, which permits man <strong>to</strong> go beyond <strong>the</strong> conf<strong>in</strong>es of his<br />

reason left <strong>to</strong> its own devices. Although mashshå˘¥ philosophy is by no<br />

means merely rationalistic as shown above, it is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ishråq¥ or illum<strong>in</strong>ative<br />

school of wisdom founded by Shaykh al-ishråq Shihåb al-<br />

D¥n Suhraward¥ that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tuitive aspect of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellect is fully<br />

emphasized and a ladder described reach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>from</strong> sensual <strong>to</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipial,<br />

metaphysical knowledge through <strong>the</strong> light of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellect. Suhraward¥,<br />

like such Western metaphysicians as St. August<strong>in</strong>e and St. Thomas,<br />

emphasizes <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of adequation or adaequatio (adaequatio rei et<br />

<strong>in</strong>tellectus) accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> which <strong>to</strong> each plane of reality <strong>the</strong>re corresponds<br />

an <strong>in</strong>strument of knowledge adequate <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> task of know<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that particular level of reality. But what characterizes and dist<strong>in</strong>guishes<br />

ishråq¥ epistemology is that accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> this school every form of<br />

knowledge is <strong>the</strong> result of an illum<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d by <strong>the</strong> lights of<br />

<strong>the</strong> purely spiritual or <strong>in</strong>telligible world. Even <strong>the</strong> act of physical vision<br />

is possible because <strong>the</strong> soul of <strong>the</strong> beholder is illum<strong>in</strong>ated by a<br />

light that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> very act of see<strong>in</strong>g embraces <strong>the</strong> object of vision. In <strong>the</strong><br />

same way, <strong>the</strong> knowledge of a logical concept is made possible by <strong>the</strong><br />

illum<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d at <strong>the</strong> moment when <strong>the</strong> very form of <strong>the</strong><br />

logical concept <strong>in</strong> question is present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d. As for higher forms<br />

of knowledge reach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> empyrean of gnosis and metaphysics,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y <strong>to</strong>o are naturally <strong>the</strong> fruit of <strong>the</strong> light of <strong>the</strong> spiritual world sh<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

upon <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d. In ishråq¥ wisdom, <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong>re is no <strong>in</strong>tellection<br />

without illum<strong>in</strong>ation (<strong>in</strong>tellects be<strong>in</strong>g so many lights) and no true<br />

knowledge without <strong>the</strong> actual “tast<strong>in</strong>g” (dhawq) of <strong>the</strong> object of that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!