30.11.2012 Views

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Notes <strong>to</strong> Chapter 4 295<br />

period <strong>in</strong> several <strong>in</strong>troductions <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir works, especially those of Sabziwår¥<br />

and <strong>the</strong> two Zun¨z¥s. See, for example, Mullå ‘Abd Allåh Zun¨z¥, Lama‘åt-i<br />

ilåhiyyah (Div<strong>in</strong>e Splendors) (Tehran: Imperial Iranian Academy of <strong>Philosophy</strong>,<br />

1976), Persian prolegomena of ≈shtiyån¥ and English and Persian <strong>in</strong>troductions<br />

of S. H. Nasr. See also <strong>the</strong> long Persian <strong>in</strong>troduction of ≈shtiyån¥ <strong>to</strong><br />

his edition of Mullå S • adrå’s Shawåhid.<br />

13. See, for example, his Fay„alat wa÷dat al-wuj¶d wa wa÷dat al-shuh¶d<br />

(Delhi, n.d.); and his Lama֌t, <strong>in</strong> Sufism and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> Tradition, trans. G. N.<br />

Jalbani and ed. D. B. Fry (London: Octagon, 1980). We shall discuss more fully<br />

some of <strong>the</strong>se figures <strong>in</strong> chapter 13 of this work.<br />

14. Such works as ‘Allåmah Sayyid Mu±ammad ¡usayn appleabå†abå˘¥’s<br />

U„¶l-i falsafah wa rawish-i ri’ålism, with commentary by Murta∂å Mu†ahhar¥, 5<br />

vols. (Qum: Dår al-‘Ilm, 1332 [A. H. solar]/1953); Sayyid Muhammad Kåπim<br />

‘A∑∑år, Wa÷dat-i wuj¶d wa badå˘ <strong>in</strong> Sayyid Jalål al-D¥n Āshtiyån¥ (ed.), Mujm¶‘ayi<br />

åthår-i A„„år (Tehran: Am¥r Kab¥r, 1376 [A.H. solar]), pp. 5–30; Sayyid Jalål<br />

al-D¥n ≈shtiyån¥, Hast¥ az naz • ar-i falsafah wa ‘irfån (Mashhad: Khurasan, 1379<br />

[A. H. lunar]/1960); Mahd¥ ¡å˘ir¥ Yazd¥, Hiram-i hast¥ (Tehran: Cultural Studies<br />

and Research Institue, 1363 [A. H. solar]/1984); and M. R. S. åli±¥ Kirmån¥,<br />

Wuj¶d az naz • ar-i falsafa-yi islåm (Qum, n.d.), bear witness <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g character<br />

of traditional <strong>Islamic</strong> metaphysics <strong>in</strong> general and <strong>the</strong> study of wuj¶d or<br />

hast¥ (<strong>in</strong> Persian) <strong>in</strong> particular.<br />

15. Metaphysics or <strong>the</strong> science of Ultimate Reality is called “ma‘rifah” or<br />

“‘irfån” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> esoteric tradition or Sufism. In <strong>the</strong> philosophical tradition,<br />

it is called “al-÷ikmat al-ilåhiyyah” <strong>in</strong> Arabic or “÷ikmat-i ilåh¥” <strong>in</strong> Persian.<br />

See <strong>the</strong> previous chapter.<br />

16. See S. H. Nasr, <strong>Islamic</strong> Life and Thought, chapter 17, “The Polarization<br />

of Be<strong>in</strong>g,” pp. 182–87.<br />

17. T. Izutsu quite justifiably translated ‘måhiyyah’ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first sense as<br />

“quiddity” and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second as “essence.” See his “Fundamental Structure,”<br />

p. 73.<br />

18. It is remarkable how <strong>the</strong> three terms wuj¶d, wijdån, and wajd resemble<br />

so closely <strong>the</strong> famous sat, chit, and ånanda <strong>in</strong> H<strong>in</strong>duism, where <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation satchitananda is considered a Name of God and <strong>the</strong> metaphysical<br />

characterization of Reality. See S. H. Nasr, Knowledge and <strong>the</strong> Sacred, p. 1.<br />

19. In his <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>to</strong> Mullå S • adrå’s Kitåb al-mashå‘ir, H. Corb<strong>in</strong>,<br />

who was <strong>the</strong> first person <strong>to</strong> translate Mart<strong>in</strong> Heidegger <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> French, has made<br />

a profound comparison between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> philosophy of be<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

Heidegger’s thought on <strong>the</strong> subject of existence.<br />

20. These three ways of envisag<strong>in</strong>g quiddity, namely, <strong>in</strong> itself, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

m<strong>in</strong>d, and <strong>in</strong> its actualization <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> external world, are called “al-i’tibåråt althalathah.”<br />

See Izutsu, “The Fundamental Structure,” p. 65.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!