30.11.2012 Views

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

122 Part 3: <strong>Islamic</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>in</strong> His<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

encyclopedia of <strong>the</strong> Persian <strong>the</strong>ologian Qå∂¥ ‘Abd al-Jabbår, composed <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> fifth/eleventh century. Their school survived even longer <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Yemen,<br />

where <strong>the</strong>ir teach<strong>in</strong>gs became adopted by <strong>the</strong> Zayd¥s of that land. 2<br />

In <strong>the</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ry of <strong>Islamic</strong> thought <strong>the</strong> Mu‘tazilites came <strong>to</strong> be<br />

known for five pr<strong>in</strong>ciples or affirmations (al-u„¶l al-khamsah), which <strong>in</strong><br />

fact summarize <strong>the</strong>ir basic teach<strong>in</strong>gs. These are unity (al-taw÷¥d), justice<br />

(al-‘adl), <strong>the</strong> promise and <strong>the</strong> threat (al-wa‘d wa˘l-wa‘¥d), <strong>in</strong>-between<br />

position <strong>in</strong> relation <strong>to</strong> a Muslim who commits a s<strong>in</strong> (al-manzilah bayn<br />

al-manzilatayn), and exhort<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> perform <strong>the</strong> good and forbidd<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong><br />

commit evil (al-amr bi˘l-ma‘r¶f wa˘l-nahy ‘an al-munkar).<br />

The Mu‘tazilites possessed a rational concept of <strong>the</strong> unity of God,<br />

and as a result <strong>the</strong>y emphasized God’s transcendence <strong>in</strong> such a manner<br />

as <strong>to</strong> reduce God almost <strong>to</strong> an abstract idea. In an atmosphere <strong>in</strong><br />

which a great deal of debate was tak<strong>in</strong>g place concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of God’s Attributes and Qualities as mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Quran, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

sought <strong>to</strong> avoid all possible anthropomorphism. As a result, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

claimed that man cannot understand <strong>the</strong> real mean<strong>in</strong>g of such Div<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Attributes as Hear<strong>in</strong>g or See<strong>in</strong>g and that such Attributes have no reality<br />

of <strong>the</strong>ir own. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>y are identical with <strong>the</strong> Div<strong>in</strong>e Essence.<br />

They also denied <strong>the</strong> possibility of knowledge of God’s Nature. In<br />

deny<strong>in</strong>g any reality <strong>to</strong> Attributes, <strong>the</strong> Mu‘tazilites also denied <strong>the</strong> eternity<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Quran as <strong>the</strong> Word of God. This view became <strong>the</strong>ir most<br />

famous and contested <strong>the</strong>sis because of its sociopolitical implications.<br />

The Mu‘tazilites also emphasized justice <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> extent that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

became known as <strong>the</strong> “people of unity and justice.” Justice for <strong>the</strong>m<br />

meant that God, be<strong>in</strong>g All-Wise, must have a purpose <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> creation<br />

of <strong>the</strong> universe and that <strong>the</strong>re is objective justice and good and evil <strong>in</strong><br />

God’s creation even if one puts aside <strong>the</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> Div<strong>in</strong>e Law<br />

(al-Shar¥‘ah) concern<strong>in</strong>g good and evil. Because God is just and good<br />

and cannot go aga<strong>in</strong>st His Nature, He must always act for <strong>the</strong> best and<br />

is just. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, God does not will evil. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, evil is created by<br />

human be<strong>in</strong>gs, who have been given by God <strong>the</strong> freedom <strong>to</strong> act <strong>in</strong><br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r a good or an evil manner. They are <strong>the</strong>refore responsible for<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir actions and will be rewarded or punished by God accord<strong>in</strong>gly.<br />

The third pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, al-wa‘d wa˘l-wa‘¥d, which means literally<br />

“promise and threat,” refers <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> ultimate fate of various classes of<br />

people, namely, <strong>the</strong> believers (mu˘m<strong>in</strong>¶n), those who are nom<strong>in</strong>ally<br />

Muslims but who have committed s<strong>in</strong> (fåsiq¶n) and those who are<br />

unbelievers (kuffår). The Mu‘tazilites had a severe view of s<strong>in</strong> and<br />

condemned both s<strong>in</strong>ners and <strong>in</strong>fidels <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> punishment of hell. For<br />

<strong>the</strong> Mu‘tazilites, faith (¥mån) was not only <strong>the</strong> assertion of <strong>the</strong> unity of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!