Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...
Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...
Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Introduction 7<br />
ern sciences and became more and more a handmaid of modern science<br />
especially with Kant and culm<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g with much of twentieth<br />
century Anglo-Saxon philosophy, which is little more than logic tied<br />
<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> scientific worldview. In an analogous way, <strong>in</strong> various traditional<br />
worlds <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> reality of prophecy and revelation was<br />
central, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> embodiment of this prophecy has been a book or<br />
some o<strong>the</strong>r form of <strong>the</strong> message brought <strong>from</strong> heaven or <strong>the</strong> messenger<br />
himself as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> H<strong>in</strong>du avatårs, <strong>the</strong> Buddha, or Christ,<br />
philosophy has had no choice but <strong>to</strong> take this central reality <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> consideration.<br />
<strong>Philosophy</strong> has <strong>to</strong> philosophize about someth<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> traditional worlds <strong>in</strong> question that someth<strong>in</strong>g has always <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
<strong>the</strong> realities revealed through prophecy, which have ranged <strong>in</strong> form<br />
<strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> illum<strong>in</strong>ations of <strong>the</strong> rishis of H<strong>in</strong>duism and <strong>the</strong> Buddha, <strong>to</strong><br />
God speak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> Moses on Mt. S<strong>in</strong>ai or <strong>the</strong> archangel Gabriel reveal<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> Quran <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Prophet of Islam.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> traditional worlds <strong>in</strong> question, philosophy has not been<br />
simply <strong>the</strong>ology as some have contended unless one limits philosophy<br />
<strong>to</strong> its modern positivistic def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>in</strong> which case <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>in</strong> reality no<br />
non-Western philosophy or for that matter medieval Western philosophy<br />
<strong>to</strong> speak of. But if we accept <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition of philosophy given by<br />
<strong>the</strong> person who is said <strong>to</strong> have first used <strong>the</strong> term—that is, Pythagoras—<br />
and see it as love of sophia, or if we accept its def<strong>in</strong>ition accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong><br />
Pla<strong>to</strong> as “<strong>the</strong> practice of death” accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> which philosophy <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />
both <strong>in</strong>tellectual activity and spiritual practice, <strong>the</strong>n certa<strong>in</strong>ly<br />
<strong>the</strong>re are many schools of philosophy <strong>in</strong> various traditional worlds,<br />
some exist<strong>in</strong>g until now only <strong>in</strong> oral form as among <strong>the</strong> Australian<br />
aborig<strong>in</strong>es and Native Americans, 18 while o<strong>the</strong>rs hav<strong>in</strong>g produced<br />
volumes of philosophical writ<strong>in</strong>gs over <strong>the</strong> centuries.<br />
Even if one were <strong>to</strong> decide <strong>to</strong> deal only with written philosophical<br />
works, one could compose volumes on <strong>the</strong> subject of philosophy<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> land of prophecy deal<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> Taoist and Confucian Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
philosophical traditions, with those of Tibetan and Mahåyåna<br />
Buddhism <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> schools of Japan, all of which possess <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
own special characteristics, and of course with <strong>the</strong> very rich philosophical<br />
traditions of H<strong>in</strong>du India. One could also turn <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Abrahamic world and write on Jewish, Christian, and <strong>Islamic</strong> philosophical<br />
schools <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> perspective of philosophical activity <strong>in</strong> worlds<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ated by prophecy. Nor would such a treatment be completely<br />
parallel for <strong>the</strong> three sister Abrahamic traditions—despite notable similarities—because<br />
while <strong>the</strong> Jewish and <strong>Islamic</strong> conceptions of prophecy<br />
and <strong>the</strong> sacred book are close <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r, that of Christianity, <strong>in</strong><br />
which <strong>the</strong> founder of <strong>the</strong> religion is seen as <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>carnation of <strong>the</strong>