30.11.2012 Views

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Mean<strong>in</strong>g and Role of <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>in</strong> Islam 33<br />

Christian and Jewish philosophy and <strong>the</strong>n refuse <strong>to</strong> accept <strong>the</strong> reality<br />

of <strong>Islamic</strong> philosophy. 6 One can with some logic assert, as has been<br />

done by Fernand van Steenberghen 7 and certa<strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, that philosophy,<br />

as unders<strong>to</strong>od by <strong>the</strong> scholastics was not called specifically “Christian”<br />

by <strong>the</strong>m but was conceived of as philosophy as such, but that<br />

did not make it any less Christian. In <strong>the</strong> same way <strong>in</strong> classical <strong>Islamic</strong><br />

texts one reads usually of <strong>the</strong> term al-falsafah (philosophy), but not alfalsafat<br />

al-islåmiyyah (<strong>Islamic</strong> philosophy), which is of a more current<br />

usage, just as most classical <strong>Islamic</strong> authors have usually referred <strong>to</strong><br />

al-d¥n (<strong>the</strong> religion), when writ<strong>in</strong>g about Islam ra<strong>the</strong>r than us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

term al-islåm. The homogeneity and unity of traditional civilization<br />

was such that for its members <strong>the</strong>ir world was <strong>the</strong> world. Western<br />

civilization certa<strong>in</strong>ly produced Christian art dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Middle Ages,<br />

but this art was usually called “art” as such. Islam produced some of<br />

<strong>the</strong> greatest architectural marvels <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world, which were, however,<br />

very rarely referred <strong>to</strong> as “<strong>Islamic</strong> architecture” by <strong>the</strong>ir own crea<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

They simply called <strong>the</strong>m “architecture.” This characteristic is a profound<br />

aspect of <strong>the</strong> medieval world and of traditional civilizations <strong>in</strong><br />

general, which must be taken <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> full consideration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> present<br />

discussion. But if we stand “outside” of <strong>the</strong>se worlds and study <strong>the</strong>m<br />

<strong>in</strong> comparison with <strong>the</strong> secular modern world or with o<strong>the</strong>r sacred<br />

civilizations, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same way that we can call Chartres “Christian<br />

architecture” and St. Thomas a “Christian philosopher” we can<br />

refer <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Alhambra as “<strong>Islamic</strong> architecture” and Ibn S¥nå and<br />

Suhraward¥ as “<strong>Islamic</strong> philosophers.”<br />

In all honesty and tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> consideration <strong>the</strong> long tradition<br />

and <strong>the</strong> still liv<strong>in</strong>g character of <strong>Islamic</strong> philosophy we cannot refuse <strong>to</strong><br />

recognize <strong>the</strong> reality of this dist<strong>in</strong>ct type of traditional philosophy as<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g just as closely allied <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure of Islam, and just as closely<br />

related <strong>to</strong> a particular dimension of it, as o<strong>the</strong>r traditional philosophies<br />

such as <strong>the</strong> H<strong>in</strong>du or Neo-Confucian are related <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> tradition<br />

<strong>in</strong> whose bosoms <strong>the</strong>y have been cultivated. For <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> philosophers,<br />

especially those of <strong>the</strong> later period, traditional philosophy has<br />

always been a way <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> truths of revelation have been seen<br />

and discussed through <strong>in</strong>tellectual and rational discourse and <strong>the</strong><br />

philosophical significance of <strong>the</strong> message of prophecy and of reality<br />

itself as it reveals itself <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> land of prophecy brought out. The truth<br />

reached by traditional philosophy is for <strong>the</strong> ÷ukamå˘, an aspect of <strong>the</strong><br />

Truth itself, of al-¡aqq, which is a Div<strong>in</strong>e Name and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong><br />

source of all revealed truth. 8 For <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> ÷ukamå˘, as for Philo,<br />

philosophy was orig<strong>in</strong>ally a form of revealed Truth, closely allied <strong>to</strong><br />

revelation. For Muslims it was connected with <strong>the</strong> name of <strong>the</strong> prophet

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!