Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...
Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...
Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Mean<strong>in</strong>g and Role of <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>in</strong> Islam 33<br />
Christian and Jewish philosophy and <strong>the</strong>n refuse <strong>to</strong> accept <strong>the</strong> reality<br />
of <strong>Islamic</strong> philosophy. 6 One can with some logic assert, as has been<br />
done by Fernand van Steenberghen 7 and certa<strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, that philosophy,<br />
as unders<strong>to</strong>od by <strong>the</strong> scholastics was not called specifically “Christian”<br />
by <strong>the</strong>m but was conceived of as philosophy as such, but that<br />
did not make it any less Christian. In <strong>the</strong> same way <strong>in</strong> classical <strong>Islamic</strong><br />
texts one reads usually of <strong>the</strong> term al-falsafah (philosophy), but not alfalsafat<br />
al-islåmiyyah (<strong>Islamic</strong> philosophy), which is of a more current<br />
usage, just as most classical <strong>Islamic</strong> authors have usually referred <strong>to</strong><br />
al-d¥n (<strong>the</strong> religion), when writ<strong>in</strong>g about Islam ra<strong>the</strong>r than us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
term al-islåm. The homogeneity and unity of traditional civilization<br />
was such that for its members <strong>the</strong>ir world was <strong>the</strong> world. Western<br />
civilization certa<strong>in</strong>ly produced Christian art dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Middle Ages,<br />
but this art was usually called “art” as such. Islam produced some of<br />
<strong>the</strong> greatest architectural marvels <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world, which were, however,<br />
very rarely referred <strong>to</strong> as “<strong>Islamic</strong> architecture” by <strong>the</strong>ir own crea<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />
They simply called <strong>the</strong>m “architecture.” This characteristic is a profound<br />
aspect of <strong>the</strong> medieval world and of traditional civilizations <strong>in</strong><br />
general, which must be taken <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> full consideration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> present<br />
discussion. But if we stand “outside” of <strong>the</strong>se worlds and study <strong>the</strong>m<br />
<strong>in</strong> comparison with <strong>the</strong> secular modern world or with o<strong>the</strong>r sacred<br />
civilizations, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same way that we can call Chartres “Christian<br />
architecture” and St. Thomas a “Christian philosopher” we can<br />
refer <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Alhambra as “<strong>Islamic</strong> architecture” and Ibn S¥nå and<br />
Suhraward¥ as “<strong>Islamic</strong> philosophers.”<br />
In all honesty and tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> consideration <strong>the</strong> long tradition<br />
and <strong>the</strong> still liv<strong>in</strong>g character of <strong>Islamic</strong> philosophy we cannot refuse <strong>to</strong><br />
recognize <strong>the</strong> reality of this dist<strong>in</strong>ct type of traditional philosophy as<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g just as closely allied <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure of Islam, and just as closely<br />
related <strong>to</strong> a particular dimension of it, as o<strong>the</strong>r traditional philosophies<br />
such as <strong>the</strong> H<strong>in</strong>du or Neo-Confucian are related <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> tradition<br />
<strong>in</strong> whose bosoms <strong>the</strong>y have been cultivated. For <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> philosophers,<br />
especially those of <strong>the</strong> later period, traditional philosophy has<br />
always been a way <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> truths of revelation have been seen<br />
and discussed through <strong>in</strong>tellectual and rational discourse and <strong>the</strong><br />
philosophical significance of <strong>the</strong> message of prophecy and of reality<br />
itself as it reveals itself <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> land of prophecy brought out. The truth<br />
reached by traditional philosophy is for <strong>the</strong> ÷ukamå˘, an aspect of <strong>the</strong><br />
Truth itself, of al-¡aqq, which is a Div<strong>in</strong>e Name and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong><br />
source of all revealed truth. 8 For <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> ÷ukamå˘, as for Philo,<br />
philosophy was orig<strong>in</strong>ally a form of revealed Truth, closely allied <strong>to</strong><br />
revelation. For Muslims it was connected with <strong>the</strong> name of <strong>the</strong> prophet