30.11.2012 Views

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dimensions of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> Intellectual Tradition 133<br />

Mu‘tazilite kalåm as a result of which this form of kalåm lasted <strong>in</strong><br />

Yemen, <strong>the</strong> home of Zayd¥ Shi‘ism, long after it had ceased <strong>to</strong> exist as<br />

a notable school of thought elsewhere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> world. Ismå‘¥l¥<br />

thought, both philosophical and <strong>the</strong>ological, developed early <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

his<strong>to</strong>ry of Islam, and <strong>the</strong> two rema<strong>in</strong>ed close <strong>to</strong> each o<strong>the</strong>r. Some of<br />

<strong>the</strong> earlier Ismå‘¥l¥ th<strong>in</strong>kers, for example, ¡am¥d al-D¥n al-Kirmån¥ (d.<br />

ca. 408/1017) and Nå∑ir-i Khusraw (d. between 465/1072 and 470/<br />

1077), were more philosophers than <strong>the</strong>ologians. O<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Ab¨<br />

¡at¥m al-Råz¥ (d. 322/933) and al-Mu˘ayyid fi˘l-D¥n al-Sh¥råz¥ (d. 470/<br />

1077), were more <strong>the</strong>ologians than philosophers. But both groups dealt<br />

with <strong>the</strong> major <strong>the</strong>mes of Ismå‘¥l¥ thought, such as <strong>the</strong> meta-on<strong>to</strong>logical<br />

status of <strong>the</strong> “unknowable” God or Deus absconditus, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>abililty of<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellect <strong>to</strong> know <strong>the</strong> Div<strong>in</strong>e Essence, <strong>the</strong> illum<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellect<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Prophet and <strong>the</strong> Imams, <strong>the</strong> celestial archetype of Adam,<br />

<strong>the</strong> relation between <strong>the</strong> function of prophecy (nubuwwah) and <strong>in</strong>itiatic<br />

power (walåyah/wilayah), and esoteric hermeneutics (ta˘w¥l). 13<br />

Twelve-Imam Shi‘ite kalåm, however, developed much later. The<br />

early concern of Twelve-Imam Shi‘ite th<strong>in</strong>kers was mostly ¡ad¥th,<br />

Quranic commentary, and jurisprudence, although earlier Shi‘ite th<strong>in</strong>kers,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Shaykh al-Muf¥d (d. 413/1022), must also be considered<br />

as <strong>the</strong>ologians. It was, however, only <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> seventh/thirteenth century<br />

that <strong>the</strong> first systematic treatise on Twelve-Imam Shi‘ite kalåm<br />

was written by none o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> celebrated ma<strong>the</strong>matician and<br />

philosopher Nå∑ir al-D¥n al-apple¨s¥ (d. 672/1273). This is probably <strong>the</strong><br />

only <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>in</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> major <strong>the</strong>ological text of a religious<br />

community was composed by a scientist of <strong>the</strong> order of Nå∑ir al-<br />

D¥n. The work of apple¨s¥ entitled Tajr¥d al-i‘tiqåd (Catharsis of Doctr<strong>in</strong>es)<br />

became rapidly <strong>the</strong> standard <strong>the</strong>ological text, and more than a hundred<br />

commentaries came <strong>to</strong> be written on it before this century. Perhaps<br />

<strong>the</strong> most notable commentary is <strong>the</strong> Kashf al-muråd (The Unveil<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Desired) by ‘Allamåh Jamål al-D¥n al-¡ill¥ (d. 726/1326), who<br />

is <strong>the</strong> most notable Shi‘ite mutakallim after apple¨s¥.<br />

In study<strong>in</strong>g this major opus, one can see clearly how Twelve-<br />

Imam Shi‘ite kalåm differs <strong>in</strong> its concerns <strong>from</strong> early Ash‘arism. The<br />

work beg<strong>in</strong>s with a discussion of be<strong>in</strong>g and nonbe<strong>in</strong>g and modes and<br />

grades of be<strong>in</strong>g. It develops an elaborate on<strong>to</strong>logy that rem<strong>in</strong>ds one<br />

more of <strong>the</strong> on<strong>to</strong>logy of Ibn S¥nå than <strong>the</strong> a<strong>to</strong>mism of al-Ash‘ar¥. 14 The<br />

work <strong>the</strong>n proceeds <strong>to</strong> a discussion of quiddity or essence, which<br />

complements that of existence. F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>the</strong> first section of <strong>the</strong> work<br />

turns <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> relation between cause and effect and <strong>the</strong> discussion of<br />

causality <strong>in</strong> general. Aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong> this basic issue, <strong>the</strong> work confirms <strong>the</strong><br />

reality of horizontal causality <strong>in</strong> direct opposition <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ash‘arite view.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!