30.11.2012 Views

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

126 Part 3: <strong>Islamic</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>in</strong> His<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

responsible for <strong>the</strong>ir actions. In emphasiz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>e of<br />

voluntarism, al-Ash‘ar¥ <strong>in</strong> a sense reduced <strong>the</strong> Div<strong>in</strong>e Nature <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Div<strong>in</strong>e Will and conceived of God as an All-Powerful Will ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

<strong>the</strong> Supreme Reality, which is and also wills. 6<br />

Ash‘arism is concerned not only with specifically religious issues<br />

but also with epistemology and <strong>the</strong> philosophy of nature. The most<br />

salient feature of Ash‘arism <strong>in</strong> this doma<strong>in</strong> is <strong>the</strong> justly famous a<strong>to</strong>mism,<br />

which has also come <strong>to</strong> be known as occasionalism, a doctr<strong>in</strong>e<br />

that was refuted explicitly by St. Thomas Aqu<strong>in</strong>as. 7 Developed mostly<br />

by his student Ab¨ Bakr al-Båqillån¥, who was <strong>the</strong> most important of<br />

<strong>the</strong> early Ash‘arites after <strong>the</strong> founder of <strong>the</strong> school, this thoroughgo<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a<strong>to</strong>mism takes away <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> created world and all th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> it <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

specific nature. All th<strong>in</strong>gs are composed of a<strong>to</strong>ms (juz˘ lå yatajazzå,<br />

literally, <strong>the</strong> “part that cannot be fur<strong>the</strong>r divided”), which are <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />

without extension. Space is likewise composed of discont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts, and time of discont<strong>in</strong>uous moments. There is no horizontal<br />

causality. Fire does not burn because it is <strong>in</strong> its nature <strong>to</strong> do so but<br />

because God has willed it. Tomorrow He could will o<strong>the</strong>rwise, and as<br />

a result fire would cease <strong>to</strong> burn. There is no such th<strong>in</strong>g as <strong>the</strong> nature<br />

of fire. What <strong>in</strong> fact appears <strong>to</strong> us as cause and effect—for example,<br />

fire caus<strong>in</strong>g a piece of cot<strong>to</strong>n <strong>to</strong> burn—is noth<strong>in</strong>g but a habit of <strong>the</strong><br />

m<strong>in</strong>d (‘ådah), because we have seen fire be<strong>in</strong>g brought near a piece of<br />

cot<strong>to</strong>n and <strong>the</strong> cot<strong>to</strong>n <strong>the</strong>n burn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> flames. 8 God is <strong>in</strong> reality <strong>the</strong><br />

only cause; it is His Will that makes fire burn <strong>the</strong> cot<strong>to</strong>n. Miracles are<br />

<strong>in</strong> fact noth<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> break<strong>in</strong>g of this habit of m<strong>in</strong>d (literally,<br />

“khåriq al-‘ådah,” which is one of <strong>the</strong> Arabic terms for miracles).<br />

Ash‘arism dissolves all horizontal causes <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> vertical cause,<br />

which is God’s Will. It <strong>the</strong>reby reduces <strong>the</strong> whole universe <strong>to</strong> a number<br />

of a<strong>to</strong>ms mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a discont<strong>in</strong>uous time and space <strong>in</strong> a world<br />

where noth<strong>in</strong>g possesses any specific nature. No wonder <strong>the</strong>n that<br />

Ash‘arism was strongly opposed <strong>to</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> philosophy, which sought<br />

<strong>to</strong> know <strong>the</strong> cause of th<strong>in</strong>gs lead<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ally <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ultimate Cause.<br />

Ash‘arism did not contribute <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> flower<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>Islamic</strong> science, because<br />

most <strong>Islamic</strong> scientists were also philosophers, and very few<br />

were mutakallim or Ash‘arite <strong>the</strong>ologians. Moreover, as we have seen,<br />

Ash‘arism rema<strong>in</strong>ed an opponent of falsafah over <strong>the</strong> centuries.<br />

MĀTURĪDISM AND appleAH • ĀWISM<br />

Several o<strong>the</strong>r contemporaries of al-Ash‘ar¥ sought, like him, <strong>to</strong> formulate<br />

a <strong>the</strong>ology that would be acceptable <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> majority of Muslims,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!