Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...
Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...
Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
126 Part 3: <strong>Islamic</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>in</strong> His<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
responsible for <strong>the</strong>ir actions. In emphasiz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>e of<br />
voluntarism, al-Ash‘ar¥ <strong>in</strong> a sense reduced <strong>the</strong> Div<strong>in</strong>e Nature <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Div<strong>in</strong>e Will and conceived of God as an All-Powerful Will ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />
<strong>the</strong> Supreme Reality, which is and also wills. 6<br />
Ash‘arism is concerned not only with specifically religious issues<br />
but also with epistemology and <strong>the</strong> philosophy of nature. The most<br />
salient feature of Ash‘arism <strong>in</strong> this doma<strong>in</strong> is <strong>the</strong> justly famous a<strong>to</strong>mism,<br />
which has also come <strong>to</strong> be known as occasionalism, a doctr<strong>in</strong>e<br />
that was refuted explicitly by St. Thomas Aqu<strong>in</strong>as. 7 Developed mostly<br />
by his student Ab¨ Bakr al-Båqillån¥, who was <strong>the</strong> most important of<br />
<strong>the</strong> early Ash‘arites after <strong>the</strong> founder of <strong>the</strong> school, this thoroughgo<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a<strong>to</strong>mism takes away <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> created world and all th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> it <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
specific nature. All th<strong>in</strong>gs are composed of a<strong>to</strong>ms (juz˘ lå yatajazzå,<br />
literally, <strong>the</strong> “part that cannot be fur<strong>the</strong>r divided”), which are <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />
without extension. Space is likewise composed of discont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
po<strong>in</strong>ts, and time of discont<strong>in</strong>uous moments. There is no horizontal<br />
causality. Fire does not burn because it is <strong>in</strong> its nature <strong>to</strong> do so but<br />
because God has willed it. Tomorrow He could will o<strong>the</strong>rwise, and as<br />
a result fire would cease <strong>to</strong> burn. There is no such th<strong>in</strong>g as <strong>the</strong> nature<br />
of fire. What <strong>in</strong> fact appears <strong>to</strong> us as cause and effect—for example,<br />
fire caus<strong>in</strong>g a piece of cot<strong>to</strong>n <strong>to</strong> burn—is noth<strong>in</strong>g but a habit of <strong>the</strong><br />
m<strong>in</strong>d (‘ådah), because we have seen fire be<strong>in</strong>g brought near a piece of<br />
cot<strong>to</strong>n and <strong>the</strong> cot<strong>to</strong>n <strong>the</strong>n burn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> flames. 8 God is <strong>in</strong> reality <strong>the</strong><br />
only cause; it is His Will that makes fire burn <strong>the</strong> cot<strong>to</strong>n. Miracles are<br />
<strong>in</strong> fact noth<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> break<strong>in</strong>g of this habit of m<strong>in</strong>d (literally,<br />
“khåriq al-‘ådah,” which is one of <strong>the</strong> Arabic terms for miracles).<br />
Ash‘arism dissolves all horizontal causes <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> vertical cause,<br />
which is God’s Will. It <strong>the</strong>reby reduces <strong>the</strong> whole universe <strong>to</strong> a number<br />
of a<strong>to</strong>ms mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a discont<strong>in</strong>uous time and space <strong>in</strong> a world<br />
where noth<strong>in</strong>g possesses any specific nature. No wonder <strong>the</strong>n that<br />
Ash‘arism was strongly opposed <strong>to</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> philosophy, which sought<br />
<strong>to</strong> know <strong>the</strong> cause of th<strong>in</strong>gs lead<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ally <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ultimate Cause.<br />
Ash‘arism did not contribute <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> flower<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>Islamic</strong> science, because<br />
most <strong>Islamic</strong> scientists were also philosophers, and very few<br />
were mutakallim or Ash‘arite <strong>the</strong>ologians. Moreover, as we have seen,<br />
Ash‘arism rema<strong>in</strong>ed an opponent of falsafah over <strong>the</strong> centuries.<br />
MĀTURĪDISM AND appleAH • ĀWISM<br />
Several o<strong>the</strong>r contemporaries of al-Ash‘ar¥ sought, like him, <strong>to</strong> formulate<br />
a <strong>the</strong>ology that would be acceptable <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> majority of Muslims,