30.11.2012 Views

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

308 Notes <strong>to</strong> Chapter 8<br />

See S. H. Nasr, “Fakhr al-D¥n al-Råz¥ ,” <strong>in</strong> The <strong>Islamic</strong> Intellectual Tradition <strong>in</strong><br />

Persia, pp. 107–21. On later <strong>Islamic</strong> <strong>the</strong>ology, see also Horten, Die philosophischen<br />

Systeme; van Ess, Die Erkenntniss Lehre des ‘Adudadd¥n al-Īc • v<br />

¥ (Wiesbaden:<br />

Harrassowitz, 1966); and Gardet and Anawati, Introduction à la théologie<br />

musulmane, vol. 1, pp. 76ff.<br />

11. F. Schuon, Christianity/Islam, p. 221.<br />

12. Ibid., pp. 220–21.<br />

13. Some of <strong>the</strong>se ideas have been treated already by Azim Nanji <strong>in</strong> his<br />

article “Ismå‘¥lism,” <strong>in</strong> Islam, <strong>Islamic</strong> Spirituality: Foundations, S. H. Nasr (ed.),<br />

World Spirituality 19 (New York: Crossroad, 1987), pp. 179–98. See also Corb<strong>in</strong><br />

et al., His<strong>to</strong>ry of <strong>Islamic</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong>, pp. 79ff.<br />

14. See Kashf al-muråd fi shar÷ tajr¥d al-i‘tiqåd, trans. and commented upon<br />

by Ab¨˘l-¡asan Sha‘rån¥ (Tehran: Kitåbfur¨sh¥-yi islåmiyyah, 1351 A.H.<br />

solar). On Shi‘ite <strong>the</strong>ology, especially of <strong>the</strong> earlier period before it became<br />

systematized by apple¨s¥, see Wilfred Madelung, Religious Schools and Sects <strong>in</strong><br />

Medieval Islam (London: Variorum Repr<strong>in</strong>ts, 1985) vii–xv.<br />

15. A contemporary example of this division is <strong>to</strong> be found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> popular<br />

two-volume work of Mu±y¥ al-D¥n Mahd¥ Ilåh¥ Qumsha˘¥, ¡ikmat-i ilåh¥<br />

‘åmm wa khå„„ (Tehran: Islåm¥, 1363 [A.H. solar]) p. 204.<br />

16. For an extensive bibliography concern<strong>in</strong>g all <strong>the</strong> figures mentioned<br />

<strong>in</strong> this chapter see Hans Daiber. With this important reference available, we<br />

have not found it necessary <strong>to</strong> provide bibliographical notes for every philosopher<br />

or <strong>the</strong>ologian cited <strong>in</strong> this survey.<br />

17. See Nasr, Three Muslim Sages, chapter 1.<br />

18. Translated by R. Walzer <strong>in</strong> his “<strong>Islamic</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong>,” <strong>in</strong> The His<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

of <strong>Philosophy</strong>, Eastern and Western, S. Radhakrishnan (ed.) (London: Allen and<br />

Unw<strong>in</strong>, 1953) 2:131.<br />

19. That is why a person such as Mullå |adrå refers <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner <strong>in</strong>tellection<br />

as be<strong>in</strong>g like “partial prophecy.”<br />

20. See Three Muslim Sages, p. 12.<br />

21. This becomes evident when one studies <strong>the</strong> technical philosophical<br />

term<strong>in</strong>ology used by al-Fåråb¥ and Ibn S¥nå.<br />

22. The question of <strong>the</strong> classification of <strong>the</strong> sciences is of great importance<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> thought and is very relevant <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> relation between philosophy<br />

and prophecy. See Osman Bakar, Classification of Knowledge <strong>in</strong> Islam<br />

(Cambridge: The <strong>Islamic</strong> Texts Society, 1998).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!