30.11.2012 Views

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

74 Part 2: Philosophical Issues<br />

ever-present element prevented <strong>the</strong> speculative m<strong>in</strong>d of <strong>the</strong> majority<br />

of <strong>Islamic</strong> philosophers ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>from</strong> mistak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> act of wuj¶d for <strong>the</strong><br />

existent that appears <strong>to</strong> possess wuj¶d on its own while be<strong>in</strong>g cut off<br />

<strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> absolute Be<strong>in</strong>g, or <strong>from</strong> fail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>guish between <strong>the</strong><br />

concept of wuj¶d and its bl<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Reality. 30<br />

THE UNITY, GRADATION, AND PRINCIPIALITY OF WUJŪD<br />

The Transcendent Unity of Be<strong>in</strong>g (wa÷dat al-wuj¶d)<br />

The crown<strong>in</strong>g achievement of <strong>Islamic</strong> philosophy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> doma<strong>in</strong> of<br />

metaphysics and especially <strong>in</strong> on<strong>to</strong>logy is <strong>to</strong> be found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> later<br />

period <strong>in</strong> Persia <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> school that, as already mentioned, has now<br />

come <strong>to</strong> be known as <strong>the</strong> School of Isfahan, 31 whose founder was M¥r<br />

Dåmåd and whose lead<strong>in</strong>g light was S • adr al-D¥n Sh¥råz¥. It is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

numerous writ<strong>in</strong>gs of this veritable sage that <strong>the</strong> rigorous logical discussion<br />

of al-Fåråb¥ and Ibn S¥nå, <strong>the</strong> critiques of al-Ghazzål¥ and<br />

Fakhr al-D¥n al-Råz¥, <strong>the</strong> illum<strong>in</strong>ative doctr<strong>in</strong>es of Shihåb al-D¥n<br />

Suhraward¥, and <strong>the</strong> supreme experiential knowledge of <strong>the</strong> Sufis as<br />

formulated by such masters of gnosis as Ibn ‘Arab¥ and |adr al-D¥n al-<br />

Qunyaw¥ became united <strong>in</strong> a vast syn<strong>the</strong>sis whose unify<strong>in</strong>g thread<br />

was <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner teach<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> Quran as well as <strong>the</strong> ¡ad¥th and <strong>the</strong><br />

say<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> Shi‘ite Imams. 32 All of <strong>the</strong> discussions about wuj¶d and<br />

måhiyyah that were go<strong>in</strong>g on for some seven centuries before <strong>the</strong> advent<br />

of <strong>the</strong> School of Isfahan <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tenth/sixteenth century (and that<br />

have been summarized above) are <strong>to</strong> be found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> grand syn<strong>the</strong>sis<br />

of S • adr al-D¥n whose metaphysical doctr<strong>in</strong>e is based upon <strong>the</strong> unity<br />

(wa÷dah), gradation (tashk¥k), and pr<strong>in</strong>cipiality (a„ålah) of wuj¶d.<br />

As far as <strong>the</strong> “transcendent unity of Be<strong>in</strong>g” or wa÷dat al-wuj¶d is<br />

concerned, it must be said at <strong>the</strong> outset that this doctr<strong>in</strong>e is not <strong>the</strong><br />

result of ratioc<strong>in</strong>ation but of <strong>in</strong>tellection and <strong>in</strong>ner experience. If correctly<br />

unders<strong>to</strong>od, it stands at <strong>the</strong> heart of <strong>the</strong> basic message of Islam,<br />

which is that of unity (al-taw÷¥d) and which is found expressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

purest form <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> testimony of Islam, Lå ilåha illa˘Llåh, <strong>the</strong>re is no<br />

div<strong>in</strong>ity but Allah. This formula is <strong>the</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>sis of all metaphysics<br />

and conta<strong>in</strong>s despite its brevity <strong>the</strong> whole doctr<strong>in</strong>e of <strong>the</strong> Unity of <strong>the</strong><br />

Div<strong>in</strong>e Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple and <strong>the</strong> manifestation of multiplicity, which cannot<br />

but issue <strong>from</strong> that Unity before whose bl<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Reality it is noth<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The Sufis and also Shi‘ite esoterists and gnostics have asked, “What<br />

does div<strong>in</strong>ity (ilåh) mean except reality or wuj¶d?” By purify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />

through spiritual practice, <strong>the</strong>y have come <strong>to</strong> realize <strong>the</strong> full

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!