Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...
Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...
Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
74 Part 2: Philosophical Issues<br />
ever-present element prevented <strong>the</strong> speculative m<strong>in</strong>d of <strong>the</strong> majority<br />
of <strong>Islamic</strong> philosophers ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>from</strong> mistak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> act of wuj¶d for <strong>the</strong><br />
existent that appears <strong>to</strong> possess wuj¶d on its own while be<strong>in</strong>g cut off<br />
<strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> absolute Be<strong>in</strong>g, or <strong>from</strong> fail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>guish between <strong>the</strong><br />
concept of wuj¶d and its bl<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Reality. 30<br />
THE UNITY, GRADATION, AND PRINCIPIALITY OF WUJŪD<br />
The Transcendent Unity of Be<strong>in</strong>g (wa÷dat al-wuj¶d)<br />
The crown<strong>in</strong>g achievement of <strong>Islamic</strong> philosophy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> doma<strong>in</strong> of<br />
metaphysics and especially <strong>in</strong> on<strong>to</strong>logy is <strong>to</strong> be found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> later<br />
period <strong>in</strong> Persia <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> school that, as already mentioned, has now<br />
come <strong>to</strong> be known as <strong>the</strong> School of Isfahan, 31 whose founder was M¥r<br />
Dåmåd and whose lead<strong>in</strong>g light was S • adr al-D¥n Sh¥råz¥. It is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
numerous writ<strong>in</strong>gs of this veritable sage that <strong>the</strong> rigorous logical discussion<br />
of al-Fåråb¥ and Ibn S¥nå, <strong>the</strong> critiques of al-Ghazzål¥ and<br />
Fakhr al-D¥n al-Råz¥, <strong>the</strong> illum<strong>in</strong>ative doctr<strong>in</strong>es of Shihåb al-D¥n<br />
Suhraward¥, and <strong>the</strong> supreme experiential knowledge of <strong>the</strong> Sufis as<br />
formulated by such masters of gnosis as Ibn ‘Arab¥ and |adr al-D¥n al-<br />
Qunyaw¥ became united <strong>in</strong> a vast syn<strong>the</strong>sis whose unify<strong>in</strong>g thread<br />
was <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner teach<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> Quran as well as <strong>the</strong> ¡ad¥th and <strong>the</strong><br />
say<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> Shi‘ite Imams. 32 All of <strong>the</strong> discussions about wuj¶d and<br />
måhiyyah that were go<strong>in</strong>g on for some seven centuries before <strong>the</strong> advent<br />
of <strong>the</strong> School of Isfahan <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tenth/sixteenth century (and that<br />
have been summarized above) are <strong>to</strong> be found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> grand syn<strong>the</strong>sis<br />
of S • adr al-D¥n whose metaphysical doctr<strong>in</strong>e is based upon <strong>the</strong> unity<br />
(wa÷dah), gradation (tashk¥k), and pr<strong>in</strong>cipiality (a„ålah) of wuj¶d.<br />
As far as <strong>the</strong> “transcendent unity of Be<strong>in</strong>g” or wa÷dat al-wuj¶d is<br />
concerned, it must be said at <strong>the</strong> outset that this doctr<strong>in</strong>e is not <strong>the</strong><br />
result of ratioc<strong>in</strong>ation but of <strong>in</strong>tellection and <strong>in</strong>ner experience. If correctly<br />
unders<strong>to</strong>od, it stands at <strong>the</strong> heart of <strong>the</strong> basic message of Islam,<br />
which is that of unity (al-taw÷¥d) and which is found expressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
purest form <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> testimony of Islam, Lå ilåha illa˘Llåh, <strong>the</strong>re is no<br />
div<strong>in</strong>ity but Allah. This formula is <strong>the</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>sis of all metaphysics<br />
and conta<strong>in</strong>s despite its brevity <strong>the</strong> whole doctr<strong>in</strong>e of <strong>the</strong> Unity of <strong>the</strong><br />
Div<strong>in</strong>e Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple and <strong>the</strong> manifestation of multiplicity, which cannot<br />
but issue <strong>from</strong> that Unity before whose bl<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Reality it is noth<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The Sufis and also Shi‘ite esoterists and gnostics have asked, “What<br />
does div<strong>in</strong>ity (ilåh) mean except reality or wuj¶d?” By purify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />
through spiritual practice, <strong>the</strong>y have come <strong>to</strong> realize <strong>the</strong> full