12.07.2015 Views

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program, Implementation ...

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program, Implementation ...

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program, Implementation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13Table II.1. SVRA Statistics on Services Provided <strong>to</strong> SSA BeneficiariesPeriod Phase 1 Phase 2Phase 2 as % <strong>of</strong>Phase 1Case Closures per Month (based on RSA 911 data)FY2001 4,025 3,922 97%FY2002 4,119 4,035 98%FY2003 4,357 4,278 98%Traditional Payment Cases Paid per Month (based on SSA VRRMS data)FY2001 191 144 75%FY2002 253 244 96%FY2003 163 159 98%New SVRA Assignments per Month (based on SSA January 2005 Disability Control File)Months 14-16 1,418 997 70%Months 23-25 1,044 NA NAThe <strong>Ticket</strong> data show, however, that Phase 1 SVRAs received an average <strong>of</strong> over 1,400assignments per month in months 14 <strong>to</strong> 16 after <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir rollout, compared <strong>to</strong> justunder 1,000 for Phase 2 SVRAs in <strong>the</strong> comparable period (bot<strong>to</strong>m section <strong>of</strong> Table II.1).The difference is all <strong>the</strong> more remarkable because <strong>the</strong> more rapid rollout in <strong>the</strong> Phase 1states means that <strong>the</strong> Phase 1 SVRAs had, on average, more time <strong>to</strong> obtain assignmentsfrom “pipeline” cases (i.e., existing beneficiary clients) before months 14 <strong>to</strong> 16. 3 The <strong>Ticket</strong>data also show that new assignments per month <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Phase 1 SVRAs fell <strong>to</strong> almost <strong>the</strong>same level by months 23 <strong>to</strong> 25.Based on <strong>the</strong>se statistics and on interviews <strong>of</strong> SVRA staff, it appears that <strong>the</strong> SVRAs areserving many beneficiaries without obtaining <strong>Ticket</strong> assignments. It appears that ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>rehas been a decline in SVRA’s perceived value <strong>of</strong> obtaining <strong>Ticket</strong>s assignments and/or anincrease in <strong>the</strong> perceived cost <strong>of</strong> obtaining assignments. That is, it seems that SVRAs view<strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> processing <strong>the</strong> paperwork for many beneficiary clients as exceeding <strong>the</strong> expectedbenefits.The SVRAs do not expect <strong>to</strong> receive payments from SSA for many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir beneficiaryclients under any payment system. This is not surprising given that in FY2001, before TTW,<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> cases for which SSA made payments was only about five percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>number <strong>of</strong> beneficiary closures. 4 In fact, given <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> cases generating payments3 The more rapid rollout is likely an important cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> large number <strong>of</strong> assignments <strong>to</strong> Phase 1SVRAs in months 4 through 7.4 Compare <strong>the</strong> FY2001 SSA cases paid per month in Table II.1 <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> beneficiary closures permonth in <strong>the</strong> same year.II: Beneficiary Participation in <strong>Ticket</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Work</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!