12.07.2015 Views

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program, Implementation ...

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program, Implementation ...

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program, Implementation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30next report, we will conduct more in-depth analyses using multivariate methods <strong>to</strong> morerigorously assess <strong>the</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>rs affecting employment and TTW participation, as well as o<strong>the</strong>rissues associated with <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> TTW.The preliminary findings indicate that TTW participants differ in many respects frombeneficiaries in general; <strong>the</strong>y are younger, more educated, and healthier than o<strong>the</strong>rbeneficiaries. While <strong>the</strong>y also share many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> characteristics that make employedbeneficiaries also different from beneficiaries in general, TTW participants and employedbeneficiaries do differ in some respects. For instance, TTW participants are younger than allemployed beneficiaries. They are also less likely <strong>to</strong> be white, <strong>to</strong> be receiving DI only, <strong>to</strong>report mental retardation as a reason for activity limitation, and <strong>to</strong> have private healthinsurance. But <strong>the</strong>y are more likely <strong>to</strong> live alone and <strong>to</strong> rely on food stamps. Relative <strong>to</strong> allbeneficiaries, TTW participants are, as we might expect, more likely <strong>to</strong> have usedemployment-related services and <strong>to</strong> be employed. Finally, TTW participants have higherexpectations about working in <strong>the</strong> future, compared not only with all beneficiaries but alsowith beneficiaries who were employed at interview.A. SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC AND HEALTH CHARACTERISTICS1. Sociodemographic CharacteristicsWith few exceptions, TTW participants are similar <strong>to</strong> beneficiaries employed atinterview but different in many respects from beneficiaries overall (Figure III.1). TTWparticipants and employed beneficiaries are more likely than <strong>the</strong> general population <strong>of</strong>working-age Social Security disability beneficiaries <strong>to</strong> be male, younger than age 40, and <strong>to</strong>have higher levels <strong>of</strong> education. They are less likely <strong>to</strong> be married and over age 55. Whilesimilar in <strong>the</strong> ways that <strong>the</strong>y differ from beneficiaries in general, TTW participants do differfrom those employed at interview in several respects: <strong>the</strong>y are less likely <strong>to</strong> be white (61percent compared with 77 percent), more likely <strong>to</strong> have schooling beyond high school (41percent compared with 28 percent), and are less likely <strong>to</strong> be married (14 percent comparedwith 26 percent).Household composition and living arrangements are important characteristics because<strong>the</strong>y can affect both <strong>the</strong> desire and capacity <strong>to</strong> seek rehabilitation services and employment.While <strong>the</strong> three groups we compared are similar in <strong>the</strong>se respects, TTW participants aresomewhat more likely <strong>to</strong> live alone but less likely <strong>to</strong> live with <strong>the</strong>ir children if <strong>the</strong>y havechildren (Figure III.2). Across all groups, only a small percentage <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries (about fivepercent) have children under <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> six.III: Beneficiary Characteristics and Employment Perspectives

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!