12.07.2015 Views

2009-10 Adopted Budget - City of Hoquiam

2009-10 Adopted Budget - City of Hoquiam

2009-10 Adopted Budget - City of Hoquiam

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VIII. DEBT SERVICE BUDGETThe following pages provide a comprehensive overview <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong>’s debt servicebudget.<strong>Hoquiam</strong>’s debt service appropriations can be divided into four categories:• Limited general obligation debt, approved without a vote <strong>of</strong> the people,• Unlimited general obligation debt, approved with a vote <strong>of</strong> the people,• Revenue supported debt, usually debt issued without a vote <strong>of</strong> the people, andsupported by the revenue stream generated by the utility, and• Assessment debt, including local improvement district (LID) debt, which constitutes aspecial limited obligation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hoquiam</strong>.The following debt summary page summarizes all debt service appropriations for <strong>2009</strong>and 20<strong>10</strong>, and indicates ending balances for each debt issue and type. In all, debtservice appropriations total $171,242 for the <strong>2009</strong>-20<strong>10</strong> Biennium. Remainingindebtedness at the end <strong>of</strong> 20<strong>10</strong> totals $404,970.The subsequent graphs illustrate the makeup <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong>’s indebtedness and comparestotal general obligation indebtedness to statutory limits.The second graph entitled “20<strong>10</strong> Remaining Debt by Type” illustrates the largepercentage <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong>’s debt that takes the form limited tax general obligation debt at79% <strong>of</strong> the total debt. Revenue debt constitutes the remaining debt and is due in largepart to the 1988 CERB loan that financed the 5 th Street Extension sewer project.The third graph compares actual general obligation indebtedness, both non-voted or“councilmatic” debt and total indebtedness, to the statutory limits on indebtedness <strong>of</strong>1.5% for councilmatic and 2.5% for all general obligation debt respectively. The chartillustrates that the <strong>City</strong> is well within its statutory limits in both cases.Following these graphs, the remaining pages provide detailed descriptions <strong>of</strong> each debtservice fund <strong>of</strong> the city, with project and activity explanations and descriptions,comprehensive debt service schedules and appropriation histories, and projectedbudgets through 20<strong>10</strong> at current indebtedness levels.225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!