02.12.2012 Views

Research Group Heussler (Malaria I) - Bernhard-Nocht-Institut für ...

Research Group Heussler (Malaria I) - Bernhard-Nocht-Institut für ...

Research Group Heussler (Malaria I) - Bernhard-Nocht-Institut für ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tropical Medicine Section<br />

Protective Immunization with Attenuated SIV:<br />

Early Events at the Tonsils<br />

Zusammenfassung<br />

Rhesusaffen wurden zunächst mit dem attenuierten<br />

Stamm SIV∆NU immunisiert (513 bp Deletion in der<br />

nef und U3 Region). 26 Wochen später folgte ein<br />

Challenge mit dem pathogenen Stamm SIVmac251.<br />

Beide SIV-Stämme wurden atraumatisch über die<br />

Tonsillen appliziert. Wir untersuchten die frühen<br />

Ereignisse in den Tonsillen und beobachteten eine<br />

schnelle Eindämmung des pathogenen Stammes in<br />

den geimpften Tieren, obwohl sich der Vakzine-<br />

Stamm weiter vermehrte. Die Schutzwirkung wird<br />

begleitet durch eine Zunahme reifer dendritischer<br />

Zellen (DCs) und γδ T-Zellen, während zytotoxische<br />

T-Zellen, die Perforin oder Granzym B exprimieren,<br />

kaum eine Rolle spielen. Unserer Ansicht nach führt<br />

die Exposition mit einem Immundefizienzvirus im<br />

Zuge der Vakzinierung möglicherweise zur Ausschüttung<br />

von Chemokinen durch reife DC und γδ<br />

T Zellen und dadurch zur Ausprägung potenter angeborener<br />

und erworbener Immunantworten, die<br />

bei einer nachfolgenden Infektion mit pathogenen<br />

Viren schützen.<br />

Introduction<br />

Vaccination has the potential to block or dampen infection.<br />

For HIV and its animal model, SIV in the rhesus<br />

macaque, it is urgent to understand more about vaccine<br />

mechanisms. It would be valuable, for example, to<br />

determine the extent to which vaccination contains a<br />

challenge with virus at its site of entry especially at mucosal<br />

surfaces. Most efforts in previous non-human<br />

vaccine trials have been directed to understanding the<br />

long-term effects of the vaccine, rather than the capacity<br />

of vaccine-elicited immunity to protect at the portal<br />

of virus entry early during infection. Similarly, more information<br />

is needed to assess protection at the level of<br />

lymphoid tissues, where the virus replicates and immune<br />

responses are generated, in addition to standard<br />

analyses of blood cell suspensions.<br />

We have addressed these questions by analysing early<br />

changes in rhesus macaques immunized with an attenuated<br />

simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) vaccine and<br />

subsequently challenged with wild type SIV via the tonsils.<br />

Although safety concerns currently argue against<br />

the use of live attenuated vaccines, such vaccines still<br />

remain an important research tool to better understand<br />

protective immunity in animal models. In the rhesus<br />

macaque primate model, the most efficient protection<br />

against challenge with highly pathogenic SIVmac is<br />

achieved by vaccination with a live attenuated SIV strain<br />

generated by deletion of the nef gene.<br />

86<br />

The advantage of the tonsillar model is that the portal of<br />

virus entry can be identified with certainty and the<br />

spread of the infection within the tonsils and to regional<br />

and remote lymph nodes can be tracked. In earlier<br />

work we showed that when infectious or vaccine forms<br />

of SIV were applied atraumatically to the lingual and<br />

palatine tonsils of rhesus macaques, the virus gained<br />

access to the oral MALT and began to replicate within<br />

T cells, primarily (1, 2). The virus then spreads to distal<br />

lymphoid organs throughout the body. In the current<br />

study, the accessibility of the oral MALT is used to<br />

study its potential as a site for vaccination against immunodeficiency<br />

viruses.<br />

Project Description and Results<br />

The use of the tonsillar route of SIV challenge provided<br />

an opportunity to study early events at the portal of<br />

virus entry in control and vaccinated monkeys. To do<br />

so, we challenged two groups of 10 animals with 2-3 x<br />

10 3 TCID50 SIV via the tonsil. 10 monkeys were vaccinated<br />

26 wks earlier with 1x10 5 TCID50 SIV∆nef applied<br />

to the tonsil, and 10 were unvaccinated controls. Following<br />

challenge with wild type SIV, we studied 4 animals<br />

from each group at days 4 and 14/15 and two at<br />

days 7/8. The animals were monitored: (A). assays for<br />

virus infection: 1. cell-associated virus load from peripheral<br />

blood mononuclear cells and lymphoid organs; 2.<br />

viral RNA in plasma by quantitative PCR; 3. in situ hybridisation<br />

of lymphoid organs for SIV RNA. (B) Immune<br />

monitoring: 1. Western blotting for SIV-specific<br />

antibodies; 2. neutralising antibodies; 3.virus-specific<br />

T cell responses; 4. activation of the complement system;<br />

5. CD4 and CD8 counts; 6. immunohistochemistry<br />

for T cells, B cells, follicular dendritic cells, bone marrow-derived<br />

dendritic cells (CD1a, Langerin, DC-LAMP,<br />

CD83) and proliferating cells. (C) Discrimination between<br />

vaccine strain and wild-type virus: 1. immunohistochemistry<br />

for nef protein in combination with in situ<br />

hybridisation for SIV RNA and 2. PCR.<br />

We found that SIV∆NU elicited a potent resistance<br />

against SIVmac251 challenge at the portal of virus entry<br />

and replication of the wild-type virus was also contained<br />

efficiently in remote lymphoid organs of vaccinated animals.<br />

The vaccine strain replicated at a low level but<br />

cells containing the nef protein of SIV were rare in vaccinated<br />

and challenged macaques. This finding was<br />

also confirmed by PCR. Surprisingly, killer cells probably<br />

did not account for the observed resistance because<br />

we could find no expansion of cytotoxic cells<br />

(positive for perforin or granzyme B) at the time that the<br />

challenge was being resisted at the portal of virus entry.<br />

In contrast, there was close to a 10 fold elevation of γδ<br />

T cells in the vaccinated animals before and after SIV<br />

challenge. Therefore, vaccination, presumably through

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!