Confessions of an IT Manager_Phil Factor
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
288 <strong>Phil</strong> <strong>Factor</strong> on the Law<br />
my application under a new name. This probably wouldn't have mattered much,<br />
had it not been for the fact that a third comp<strong>an</strong>y bought up the assets <strong>of</strong> the<br />
dead comp<strong>an</strong>y, including the designs <strong>an</strong>d code that I'd written, <strong>an</strong>d then<br />
engaged me to develop the product.<br />
Very soon, there were two virtually identical products on the market. The<br />
new owner was underst<strong>an</strong>dably aggrieved, especially after I obtained a copy <strong>of</strong><br />
their product, disassembled it, <strong>an</strong>d was able to prove that it was identical to<br />
mine. It looked like <strong>an</strong> open-<strong>an</strong>d-shut case <strong>an</strong>d so <strong>of</strong>f we went, full <strong>of</strong><br />
confidence, to the solicitor's <strong>of</strong>fice, armed with a file <strong>of</strong> documents. He smiled<br />
brightly, took our instructions, <strong>an</strong>d briefed a leading London barrister.<br />
After a while, we were summoned to the barrister's chambers, in Lincoln's<br />
Inn. It was like a mediaeval cloister <strong>of</strong> Oxford College. The barrister was<br />
articulate <strong>an</strong>d affable, just as <strong>an</strong>yone would be on his hourly rate. We went<br />
through the evidence, <strong>an</strong>d he absorbed the technical intricacies as though he<br />
had been programming X25 all his life.<br />
"Oh yes," he admitted once we'd finished, "you have a case, a good case.<br />
But…" he paused for a few seconds, thereby adding a few more pounds to his<br />
charges.<br />
"But what? "<br />
"We could ask for <strong>an</strong> injunction to stop them selling the package … "<br />
"Yes, yes," we agreed eagerly.<br />
"… but the problem with that is that you might lose the subsequent court<br />
case, <strong>an</strong>d the other comp<strong>an</strong>y would have unfairly lost all that business; it would<br />
have suffered loss as a result <strong>of</strong> the injunction, for which you would then be<br />
liable."<br />
"But we won't lose!" we protested.<br />
"I'm just telling you the system," he explained. "There have to be checks in<br />
place to prevent malicious <strong>an</strong>d unreasonable injunctions being requested. If you<br />
ask for a preliminary injunction to stop them using your product then, as a<br />
security, the Court will require you to deposit a sum <strong>of</strong> money equivalent to the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> their subsequent losses, just in case the action goes against you. The<br />
other party is not going to underestimate their losses are they? They will suffer<br />
enormous fin<strong>an</strong>cial hardship, <strong>an</strong>d might even go into liquidation. I suspect that<br />
they will ask for around a million pounds. That is money you have to find<br />
before you are awarded <strong>an</strong> injunction. "<br />
"But it is <strong>an</strong> open or shut case. Surely, it is unfair to assume we are going to<br />
lose?"