You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IFTA JOURNAL<br />
2017 EDITION<br />
Gold<br />
Analysis results for Gold futures are mentioned below.<br />
1. According to investigation for EMP 2.0 and price fluctuations rate in Table 7, as a result of the Wilcoxon test, there was significant<br />
difference on EMP 2.0 and price fluctuations rate 2 days before. However, Figure 8 shows significant difference was not found due<br />
to unstable peak of EMP 2.0, as shown on the red line in Figure 8.<br />
2. There was no significant difference, even if EMP 2.0 and price fluctuations rate were divided into White candle day and Black candle<br />
day.<br />
3. On the trend composition ratio (Table 8), although there was no significant difference for EMP 2.0 on the four cases of all price<br />
fluctuations rate, it was found that there was significant difference in the case of “UP” of 5-day moving average on EMP 2.0 White<br />
candle day and EMP 2.0 Black candle day.<br />
Table 7. Gold null hypothesis test<br />
Figure 8. Gold, EMP 2.0 2 days before<br />
*Red: EMP 2.0 Frequency ratio distribution<br />
*Blue: All price fluctuations ratio distribution<br />
Table 8. Gold, trend composition test of equal or given proportions<br />
PAGE 20<br />
IFTA.ORG
Change language