21.01.2017 Views

STRATEGIC

RAND_RR1631

RAND_RR1631

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Summary<br />

xix<br />

deal with because of its nuclear capabilities. In the long term, Putin’s<br />

Russia may well be in decline, due to demographic weakness, overdependence<br />

on oil exports, a corrupt and inefficient oligarchical system,<br />

and a brain drain. However, declining powers can sometimes be the<br />

most dangerous.<br />

China has been modernizing its military for two decades. The<br />

growth in its defense spending has almost always outpaced even the<br />

spectacular growth of its economy. It has improved its air and missile<br />

capabilities, modernized and expanded its navy, and adopted more<br />

aggressive postures, particularly in the South China Sea. China is<br />

improving its anti-access/area denial capabilities to counter the U.S.<br />

ability to project military power throughout East Asia, making it less<br />

certain that the United States would win a decisive victory in case of<br />

war. As part of the buildup, China is constructing thousands of longrange<br />

missiles that could strike targets throughout the region, including<br />

major cities such as Tokyo, and even U.S. forces at Andersen Air<br />

Force Base in Guam. China has invested in a modern nuclear weapons<br />

arsenal that provides it with an increasingly secure strategic deterrent,<br />

one that appears to provide Beijing with a key capability that it has<br />

long sought and that it was lacking as recently as the mid-1990s: a survivable<br />

and thus assured retaliatory capability. While disconcerting,<br />

this capability is not automatically bad for the United States because to<br />

the extent that it reassures Beijing, it reduces any incentive for a Chinese<br />

first strike.<br />

The only unalloyed U.S. adversaries are North Korea and violent<br />

jihadist movements, as expressed by ISIS, al Qaeda, and related groups.<br />

Threats to U.S. national security may now emanate from strong or<br />

authoritarian states that flout international norms, such as Russia or<br />

China; brittle states that possess nuclear weapons or the means to<br />

develop them, such as North Korea, Pakistan, and Iran; and failing<br />

or misgoverned states that cannot or will not enforce the rule of law<br />

on their territories, such as Somalia, Syria, or Libya. Threats that once<br />

came from “somewhere” can now come from “anywhere,” contributing<br />

to the meme of a world that is falling apart. Despite the popular<br />

perception, a respected index of state fragility found that in aggregate,<br />

states became more stable between 1995 and 2013. (The Middle East

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!