11.12.2012 Views

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.2. Characterization <strong>of</strong> electrospun P(VdF-<br />

HFP) nanocomposite membranes<br />

The thermal properties <strong>of</strong> the membranes<br />

were evaluated by DSC (2010 TA Instruments)<br />

at a heat<strong>in</strong>g rate <strong>of</strong> 10 ºC/m<strong>in</strong> under a nitrogen<br />

atmosphere from 50 to 200 ºC. The mechanical<br />

properties were evaluated follow<strong>in</strong>g ASTM<br />

D638. The fiber morphology was recorded on<br />

field-emission SEM (FE-SEM: Hitachi S-4800),<br />

and the average fiber diameter (AFD) was<br />

estimated. The porosity (P) [4] and tortuosity [5]<br />

were determ<strong>in</strong>ed as published elsewhere.<br />

2.3. Electrochemical evaluation<br />

PEs were prepared by soak<strong>in</strong>g a circular<br />

piece <strong>of</strong> the membrane (diameter 2 cm) <strong>in</strong> the<br />

liquid electrolyte, 1 M LiPF6 <strong>in</strong> EC/DMC (1:1<br />

v/v) (Samsung Cheil Industries Inc.). The<br />

electrolyte uptake (δ) and the leakage properties<br />

<strong>of</strong> the PEs were measured follow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

procedure reported earlier [6].<br />

The ionic conductivity <strong>of</strong> the PEs were<br />

measured by the AC impedance method us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sta<strong>in</strong>less steel (SS) Swagelok ® cells with 1M6<br />

frequency analyzer over the temperature range<br />

from 0 to 60 °C. The cell was kept at each<br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g temperature for a m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>of</strong> 30 m<strong>in</strong><br />

to atta<strong>in</strong> thermal equilibrium. The <strong>in</strong>terfacial<br />

resistance Rf between the PE and lithium metal<br />

electrode was measured at room temperature by<br />

the impedance response <strong>of</strong> Li/PE/Li cells. Both<br />

the measurements were performed at an<br />

amplitude <strong>of</strong> 20 mV over the frequency range 10<br />

mHz to 2 MHz. The electrochemical stability<br />

was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by l<strong>in</strong>ear sweep voltammetry<br />

(LSV) <strong>of</strong> Li/PE/SS cells at a scan rate <strong>of</strong> 1 mV/s<br />

over the range <strong>of</strong> 2-5.5 V at 25 ºC. From the<br />

porosity and conductivity measurements,<br />

tortuosity <strong>of</strong> the membranes was calculated [5]:<br />

Two-electrode lithium prototype co<strong>in</strong> cells<br />

were fabricated by plac<strong>in</strong>g the electrospun PE<br />

between lithium metal anode (300 μm thick,<br />

Cyprus Foote M<strong>in</strong>eral Co.) and carbon-coated<br />

lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) cathode [7].<br />

The electrochemical tests <strong>of</strong> the Li/PE/LiFePO4<br />

cells were conducted <strong>in</strong> an automatic<br />

galvanostatic charge-discharge unit, WBCS3000<br />

battery cycler (WonA Tech. Co.), between 2.5<br />

and 4.0 V at 25 ºC at a current density <strong>of</strong> 0.1 C.<br />

- 2 -<br />

3. Results and discussion<br />

3.1. Membrane morphology<br />

SEM images <strong>of</strong> P(VdF-HFP) membranes<br />

prepared without and with ceramic fillers reveal<br />

the presence <strong>of</strong> well <strong>in</strong>terconnected<br />

<strong>in</strong>terstices/pores between the fibers as shown <strong>in</strong><br />

Fig. 1. The use <strong>of</strong> the solvent mixture <strong>of</strong><br />

acetone/DMAc <strong>in</strong> the weight ratio <strong>of</strong> 7:3 results<br />

<strong>in</strong> membranes with lower AFD as compared to<br />

one component solvent or other solvent ratios<br />

and smaller pore size due to the formation <strong>of</strong><br />

relatively large number <strong>of</strong> physical crossl<strong>in</strong>ks.<br />

The membranes have fully <strong>in</strong>terconnected pore<br />

structure. The ranges <strong>of</strong> fiber diameters obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

for different samples along with the AFDs are<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The membrane prepared<br />

without ceramic filler exhibits a comparatively<br />

uniform morphology with an AFD <strong>of</strong> 1.2 μm.<br />

The AFD is higher for the membranes that<br />

conta<strong>in</strong> fillers. The membrane prepared with<br />

BaTiO3 has more uniform fiber diameter and<br />

narrower distribution <strong>of</strong> the fiber diameters as<br />

compared to the other membranes. The larger<br />

diameter <strong>of</strong> the fiber <strong>in</strong> membranes with fillers<br />

can be attributed to the substantial <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />

viscosity that results from the blend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

polymer solution with the filler particles.<br />

Fig. 1. SEM images <strong>of</strong> electrospun P(VdF-HFP)<br />

membranes with (A) no filler, (B) SiO2, (C) Al2O3,<br />

and (D) BaTiO3.<br />

3.2. Thermal and mechanical properties<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>corporation <strong>of</strong> 6% nano-sized<br />

ceramic fillers on the thermal properties <strong>of</strong><br />

electrospun P(VdF-HFP) polymer is shown <strong>in</strong><br />

Fig. 2. The melt<strong>in</strong>g temperature <strong>of</strong> pure P(VdF-<br />

HFP) is 159 ºC [8], while the electrospun

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!