11.12.2012 Views

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Results and Discussion<br />

Properties <strong>of</strong> Unplasticized and Unfilled Polyrethane Elastomer<br />

The cur<strong>in</strong>g efficiency <strong>of</strong> four types (X1, X2, X3, and X4) <strong>of</strong> hydroxyl term<strong>in</strong>ated curatives have<br />

been tested on three types <strong>of</strong> polyether based isocyanate term<strong>in</strong>ated prepolymer (A,B and C) with<br />

different functional additives. Among the curatives, the curative X1 imparts highest pot life (work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

time) towards the polyether prepolymers (A, B and C) tested <strong>in</strong> this <strong>in</strong>vestigation, whereas the curative<br />

X4 imparts shortest pot life and other two curatives X2 and X3 lie between these two extremes. This<br />

behavior may be attributed to the reactive nature and the percentage <strong>of</strong> isocyanate groups and hydroxyl<br />

groups present <strong>in</strong> the polyether prepolymers and curatives respectively. The pot life for prepolymer A<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed, when mixed with curatives X1, X2, X3, and X4 are 75, 62, 47 and 29 m<strong>in</strong>utes at 100°C<br />

respectively.<br />

Hardness <strong>of</strong> the cured polyurethane elastomers is determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g the durometer and the results<br />

are obta<strong>in</strong>ed for different comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong> prepolymer and curatives. Hardness, shore A obta<strong>in</strong>ed for the<br />

polyurethane elastomer resulted from prepolymer A with curatives X1, X2, X3 and X4 are 57, 54, 53, and<br />

45 respectively. Among the polyurethane elastomer obta<strong>in</strong>ed, the product from prepolymers A with<br />

curative X1 results <strong>in</strong> highest hardness (shore A57) which may be expla<strong>in</strong>ed due to the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong><br />

higher cross l<strong>in</strong>k density resulted from the molecular structure. Similarly, among the prepolymers A, B<br />

and C, the product polyurethane elastomer obta<strong>in</strong>ed from prepolymer C with correspond<strong>in</strong>g curative<br />

imparts higher hardness, shore A69, than prepolymers A and B, due to higher percentage <strong>of</strong> isocyanate<br />

and hydroxyl groups, which <strong>in</strong> turn enhances the crossl<strong>in</strong>k density.<br />

Tensile strength determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g tensile tester for the different polyurethane elastomers are<br />

presented. Tensile strength results are merely reflections <strong>of</strong> hardness values, the product from prepolymer<br />

C with curative X1 possess higher tensile strength (42.7 kg/cm 2 ) than from other comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong><br />

prepolymers A and B curatives X2, X3 and X4. Percentage elongation results obta<strong>in</strong>ed for different<br />

polyurethane elastomers are studied. The product resulted from prepolymer B with curative X4 exhibits<br />

highest elongation (500%), while for the product from prepolymer C with curative X1 gives lowest value<br />

(120%). The percentage elongation values are <strong>in</strong>versely proportional to the hardness and l<strong>in</strong>k density <strong>of</strong><br />

the products.<br />

Modulus, tear strength, and density for different comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong> elastomers are studied. All these<br />

values <strong>in</strong>crease with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g crossl<strong>in</strong>k density and hardness due to higher percentage <strong>of</strong> reactive groups<br />

<strong>in</strong> the prepolymers. Compression set values for the polyurethane elastomers tested after 22 hours at 70°C<br />

are given. The elastomer from the prepolymer A with curative X1 exhibits lowest value <strong>of</strong> compression<br />

set 1.6%, while 3.19% is obta<strong>in</strong>ed for the product from prepolymer B with X1, these results reveals that<br />

the former AX1 imparts better dimensional stability than the latter BX1.<br />

Solvent resistance characteristics <strong>of</strong> different comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong> elastomers are carried out by<br />

immers<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong> different organic solvents for the period <strong>of</strong> 7 days. The solvent resistant<br />

characteristics are expressed <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> percentage weight ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> the elastomer. In this respect, the<br />

product from CX1 gives the lowest value (135%) and the product from BX4 gives the highest value<br />

(505%), this is due to nature <strong>of</strong> molecular structure and types <strong>of</strong> secondary forces <strong>in</strong>volved. Among the<br />

solvent system used, ethyl acetate <strong>in</strong>fluences more swell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> elastomers than others due to dipole-dipole<br />

attraction. The moisture absorption characteristics <strong>of</strong> different elastomer comb<strong>in</strong>ations are also studied.<br />

The product from CX4 absorbs lowest percentage (1.5%) <strong>of</strong> moisture; whereas the product from AX1<br />

absorbs highest percentage (3.1%) <strong>of</strong> moisture. This behavior is due to the number <strong>of</strong> hydrogen bonds<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the elastomer structure.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!