11.12.2012 Views

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Excess PVA solution was dra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>of</strong>f and the membranes were dried at ambient temperature. The<br />

membranes were subsequently heated <strong>in</strong> oven at a temperature <strong>of</strong> 125±2 ºC for 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes.<br />

Characterization <strong>of</strong> Membranes:<br />

FT-IR: The IR spectrum <strong>of</strong> PSF ultrafiltration and cross-l<strong>in</strong>ked PVA TFC membranes (<strong>of</strong> size 6 cm × 3<br />

cm) were recorded <strong>in</strong> the middle <strong>in</strong>frared region us<strong>in</strong>g a Perk<strong>in</strong> Elmer 400 FT-IR spectrometer.<br />

Contact angle (θ): Contact angle <strong>of</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g PVA TFC membranes was studied by Wilhelmy plate<br />

method us<strong>in</strong>g Dynamic Contact Angle Tensiometer (DCAT 21, Data Physics).<br />

Scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscopy (SEM): Phase morphology (Cross-sectional and topography) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

membranes were studied us<strong>in</strong>g Leo microscope at 15 kV accelerat<strong>in</strong>g voltage.<br />

Membranes performance <strong>test<strong>in</strong>g</strong>: The salt rejection characteristics <strong>of</strong> membranes were studied <strong>in</strong> RO test<br />

cell by pass<strong>in</strong>g aqueous feed solutions <strong>of</strong> mono and bivalent salts separately through the membranes at<br />

different pressure (150-350 psi). Permeate flux was studied and solute rejection was calculated with the<br />

help <strong>of</strong> equation 1. The concentrations <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>organic salts <strong>in</strong> feed and permeate were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

<strong>in</strong>ductively coupled plasma spectrometry (ICP), chemical analysis and conductivity measurements.<br />

⎡ Concentration<strong>of</strong><br />

solute<strong>in</strong><br />

permeate⎤<br />

Soluterejection(<br />

R)<br />

(%) = ⎢1<br />

−<br />

⎥×<br />

100<br />

( 1)<br />

⎣ Concentration<strong>of</strong><br />

solute<strong>in</strong><br />

feed ⎦<br />

Molecular weight cut-<strong>of</strong>f (MWCO): A mixed solution conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g glucose, sucrose, raff<strong>in</strong>ose and glycerol<br />

each <strong>of</strong> 500 ppm was passed through the membranes. The percent organic solute <strong>in</strong> feed and permeate<br />

was analyzed by High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and Total organic carbon (TOC)<br />

analysis. The solute rejection was calculated by us<strong>in</strong>g the formula 1. The solute rejection above 85% was<br />

taken as MWCO <strong>of</strong> membranes.<br />

Result and Discussion<br />

The base PSF substrate was prepared from 17% PSF solution and PVA layer was coated with 1% PVA<br />

solution conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g MA as curative <strong>in</strong> the concentration range from 2-50% (w/w with respect to PVA).<br />

The IR spectrum <strong>of</strong> PSF base substrate membrane is shown <strong>in</strong> figure 1(graph I). The existence <strong>of</strong> PVA at<br />

the surface <strong>of</strong> PSF TFC membranes is <strong>in</strong>dicated by the peak at 3,200-3,400 cm -1 (Figure1, graph II),<br />

which is the characteristics <strong>of</strong> OH <strong>of</strong> PVA. The peak at 1,335 cm -1 is due to the ester l<strong>in</strong>kages formed by<br />

the cross-l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> PVA with MA.<br />

Contact angle reflects the hydrophilicity <strong>of</strong> any surface. PVA coat<strong>in</strong>g provides the hydrophilicity to<br />

hydrophobic PSF membranes. The hydrophilic nature <strong>of</strong> PVA TFC membranes are reflected by their<br />

average lower contact angle (81º) value compare to that <strong>of</strong> hydrophobic PSF membranes (89.5 º).<br />

Cross sectional morphology <strong>of</strong> PSF membranes show a wide open pore structure (Figure 2A). However<br />

coat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> PVA partially masks the polysulphone layer and overall reduction <strong>in</strong> the average pore size is<br />

observed (Figure 2B).<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> different process parameters on membranes performance:<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>of</strong> curative dose on membrane performance: To see the effect <strong>of</strong> MA concentration on<br />

stability <strong>of</strong> rejection layer, the flux (Figure 3) and rejection (Figure 4) pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the membranes (vary<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> the cross-l<strong>in</strong>k density <strong>of</strong> the rejection layer) were tested <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous mode for a period <strong>of</strong> 24 hours<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g 500 ppm MgSO4 solution. The membranes were cured at a temperature <strong>of</strong> 125±2 ºC for duration <strong>of</strong><br />

30 m<strong>in</strong>utes. It is observed from Figure 3 that lowers the curative dose higher the membrane flux.<br />

However all the membranes show almost consistent flux over the studied period irrespective <strong>of</strong> the crossl<strong>in</strong>ker<br />

dose. It is also observed (Figure 4) that <strong>in</strong> the rejection pr<strong>of</strong>iles there is a slight fall with time for<br />

membranes prepared with lower curative dose <strong>of</strong> 2 and 5% MA. However for MA dose >5% the rejection<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s constant with time. Hence 5-10% concentration <strong>of</strong> MA may be considered as optimum for cur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> such membranes.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> cure time on membrane performance: Membranes were prepared from 17% PSF and 1% PVA-1<br />

with MA concentration <strong>of</strong> 10% (w/w) cured by vary<strong>in</strong>g the cure time from 10-40 m<strong>in</strong>utes at a temperature<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!