11.12.2012 Views

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As 'C' channel structures is non-symmetrical and has numerous discont<strong>in</strong>uities, mechanical behaviour <strong>of</strong> the<br />

structure cannot be easily predicted. Due to its irregular features, number <strong>of</strong> stress concentrations po<strong>in</strong>ts will be<br />

present <strong>in</strong> it. Any improper fabrication or design will lead to catastrophic failure <strong>of</strong> the structure.<br />

Analysis<br />

The 3-D model developed was imported <strong>in</strong> FEM analysis s<strong>of</strong>tware Ansys. Ansys was selected primarily <strong>of</strong> its<br />

excellent structural analysis capabilities and ability to support orthotropic and anisotropic materials <strong>in</strong> analysis.<br />

Von-mises stresses and Displacement Vector Sum were determ<strong>in</strong>ed. Analysis was carried out for 3 different<br />

polymer composites viz.<br />

1. 30 % short glass fibre filled polycarbonate,<br />

2. 40% Unidirectional glass fibre re<strong>in</strong>forced Epoxy, and<br />

3. 40% Unidirectional carbon fibre re<strong>in</strong>forced Epoxy.<br />

The properties <strong>of</strong> the same are tabulated <strong>in</strong> table 1. The failure criteria were also analysed to determ<strong>in</strong>e whether the<br />

structure will withstand or fail while <strong>in</strong> operation.<br />

The structure be<strong>in</strong>g air borne, it needs to withstand high <strong>in</strong>ertial loads while <strong>in</strong> manoeuvr<strong>in</strong>g, take <strong>of</strong>f and land<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

and deployed underwater from a fly<strong>in</strong>g platform has to withstand high <strong>in</strong>ertial loads as well as hydrostatic pressures<br />

on the system. While <strong>in</strong> analysis <strong>in</strong>ertial load was taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration. As the structure is to deployed<br />

underwater hydrostatic pressure was also taken <strong>in</strong> account on complete structure.<br />

The structure is mounted with sensors <strong>of</strong> weight 180 gm at 5 different mount<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t along with 2 h<strong>in</strong>ge po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

and hydrostatic load <strong>of</strong> 4 MPa. The sensors are modelled as lumped mass for ease <strong>of</strong> modell<strong>in</strong>g. A section <strong>of</strong> the<br />

boundary condition is as shown <strong>in</strong> the figure 2. The red arrows show the hydrostatic pressure act<strong>in</strong>g throughout the<br />

structure while light blue arrows shows the h<strong>in</strong>ge po<strong>in</strong>t area with zero degree <strong>of</strong> freedom. The yellow arrows<br />

represent the sensor mass act<strong>in</strong>g on the structure.<br />

The structure was modelled us<strong>in</strong>g 10 node tetrahedral structural element referred at SOLID 187 <strong>in</strong> Ansys.<br />

SOLID187 element is a higher order 3-D, 10-node element. SOLID187 has a quadratic displacement behaviour and<br />

is well suited to modell<strong>in</strong>g irregular meshes such as those produced from various CAD/CAM systems. The element<br />

is def<strong>in</strong>ed by 10 nodes hav<strong>in</strong>g three degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom at each node: translations <strong>in</strong> the nodal x, y, and z directions.<br />

The element has plasticity, hyperelasticity, creep, stress stiffen<strong>in</strong>g, large deflection, and large stra<strong>in</strong> capabilities. It<br />

also has mixed formulation capability for simulat<strong>in</strong>g deformations <strong>of</strong> nearly <strong>in</strong>compressible elastoplastic materials,<br />

fully <strong>in</strong>compressible hyperelastic materials and elastic orthotropic materials. [4,5]<br />

Results and Analysis<br />

The analysis carried out with various materials and their results are discussed below. Von-mises stress analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the structure with 3 identified composites were carried out and results are shown <strong>in</strong> figure 3, 4 and 5 respectively<br />

for 30 % short glass fibre filled polycarbonate, 40% Unidirectional glass fibre re<strong>in</strong>forced Epoxy and 40%<br />

Unidirectional carbon fibre re<strong>in</strong>forced Epoxy.<br />

The maximum stress obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> three cases is <strong>in</strong> 320 MPa which well below the failure strength <strong>of</strong> carbon fibre<br />

based composites. Similarly, for the case <strong>of</strong> glass fibre based composite and glass fibre filled polycarbonate does<br />

satisfy the requirement <strong>of</strong> maximum break<strong>in</strong>g strength. Hence <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> required strength, component with either<br />

<strong>of</strong> the material will withstand the operat<strong>in</strong>g conditions.Next, Vector displacement <strong>of</strong> the component was analysed<br />

and results are shown <strong>in</strong> the figures 6, 7 and 8.<br />

The 30% short glass fibre filled polycarbonate shows 35 mm <strong>of</strong> deformation <strong>in</strong> the lower end <strong>of</strong> the structure. As<br />

this much variation <strong>in</strong> the location <strong>of</strong> the mounted sensor will lead to erroneous result, it is unacceptable as suitable<br />

material for fabrication <strong>of</strong> the component. Both Glass fibre and carbon fibre based epoxy composite shows much<br />

less deformation and are suitable for the application. However, it is well known from the literature that glass fibre<br />

undergo gelation when it is exposed to sea water for long period <strong>of</strong> time and hence high factor <strong>of</strong> safety is required<br />

<strong>in</strong> design <strong>of</strong> the component. [6] As the component be<strong>in</strong>g modelled is limited by space constra<strong>in</strong>t hence only<br />

recommended material is Carbon fibre based composite for fabrication <strong>of</strong> component.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a critical component used <strong>in</strong> air platform based underwater deployable system was carried out to<br />

analyse the f<strong>in</strong>alize the selection <strong>of</strong> suitable material <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the component us<strong>in</strong>g FEM s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

ANSYS. The structure hav<strong>in</strong>g various irregularities <strong>in</strong> the shape was modelled us<strong>in</strong>g solid elements and Von-mises<br />

stresses and total vector displacements were analysed. The materials selected for analysis were 30 % short glass<br />

fibre filled polycarbonate, 40% Unidirectional glass fibre re<strong>in</strong>forced Epoxy and 40% Unidirectional carbon fibre

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!