11.12.2012 Views

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

II) Elongation at break (% Elongation)<br />

For all compositions, elongation at break <strong>of</strong> nanocomposites <strong>in</strong>creased with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

filler content up to 3 wt % and 4 wt % filler load<strong>in</strong>g for both Brabender and two roll mill<br />

respectively. Value <strong>of</strong> elongation at break decreased after atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the peak value, the trend was<br />

found to be similar <strong>in</strong> both the techniques. The reason may be agglomeration <strong>of</strong> nano particles as<br />

well as formation <strong>of</strong> weaker <strong>in</strong>terfacial region between the filler surface and matrix where <strong>in</strong><br />

cracks develops.<br />

% Elongation<br />

700<br />

650<br />

600<br />

550<br />

500<br />

450<br />

400<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Filler content (w t%)<br />

Tw o roll mill<br />

Brabender<br />

Figure 3. % elongation <strong>of</strong> SBR filled with nano CaCO3 processed on two roll mill (TRM)<br />

and Brabender Plastograph<br />

3. Hardness<br />

Hardness <strong>of</strong> all composition <strong>in</strong>creased up to 4 wt % <strong>of</strong> filler amount for both mix<strong>in</strong>g<br />

technique than the pure SBR composites as shown <strong>in</strong> figure. Hardness <strong>in</strong>creased due to the<br />

greater degree <strong>of</strong> crossl<strong>in</strong>kage which has been occur dur<strong>in</strong>g vulcanization <strong>of</strong> rubber<br />

nanocomposites by uniform transfer <strong>of</strong> heat <strong>in</strong> to the rubber matrix. Also the formation <strong>of</strong><br />

effective layer is responsible for <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> hardness <strong>of</strong> rubber nanocomposites.<br />

Hardness<br />

48<br />

47<br />

46<br />

45<br />

44<br />

43<br />

42<br />

41<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Filler content (w t%)<br />

Tw o roll mill<br />

Brabender<br />

Figure 4. Hardness <strong>of</strong> SBR filled with nano CaCO3 processed on two roll mill (TRM) and<br />

Brabender Plastograph

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!