11.12.2012 Views

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

We tried the classical WLF equation to describe the relation ship between aT and temperature. It<br />

was found that the WLF equation is suitable to describe the temperature dependence.<br />

Parallel to the dynamic flexural tests, short-term static flexural tests were also conducted. Table 3<br />

shows a plot <strong>of</strong> the experimental results obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the flexural test <strong>of</strong> the all-PP composites.<br />

The result shows the average value <strong>of</strong> elastic modulus and maximum flexural strength <strong>of</strong> the β-PP<br />

matrix and all-PP composite lam<strong>in</strong>ates. The stiffness <strong>of</strong> the all-PP woven composites is to a great<br />

extent governed by the stiffness <strong>of</strong> the tapes <strong>in</strong> the longitud<strong>in</strong>al direction [23]. It shows that<br />

strength (36%) and stiffness (85%) <strong>of</strong> the β-PP matrix is improved significantly by re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g PP<br />

tapes. A detailed study on the flexural behaviour <strong>of</strong> all-PP composite (Pure ® ) was conducted <strong>in</strong><br />

our laboratory and reported that the short-term as well as long-term viscoelastic behaviours are<br />

greatly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the composite morphology, particularly the re<strong>in</strong>forcement architecture.<br />

5. Conclusion<br />

All-PP composite were produced from α-PP tapes and β-PP film/matrix by a hot consolidation<br />

method. This study has proved that extruded α-PP tapes (high melt temperature) can be used for<br />

re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g the β-PP matrix (low melt temperature). At room temperature the E′ <strong>of</strong> the β-PP<br />

matrix is <strong>in</strong>creased by 0.7 GPa by the effective re<strong>in</strong>forcement <strong>of</strong> α-PP tape obta<strong>in</strong>ed by DMTA.<br />

Similarly there is an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the flexural strength and stiffness <strong>of</strong> the all-PP composite also<br />

observed. The tanδ peak was not discernable for the re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g α-PP tape, while it is clearly<br />

identified for the β-PP matrix and all-PP composite lam<strong>in</strong>ate. Though, the position <strong>of</strong> Tg<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed nearly unchanged, the peak <strong>in</strong>tensity and magnitude decreased significantly. The<br />

storage modulus master curve approach a similar plateau value at high frequency, but the term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

region at lower frequencies is more dependent on re<strong>in</strong>forcement effect <strong>of</strong> composite compared<br />

with the β-PP matrix. The experimental shift factors showed a good agreement with both WLF<br />

and Arrhenius models.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

The authors thank the German Science Foundation for the f<strong>in</strong>ancial support <strong>of</strong> this project (DFG<br />

Ka 1202/17)<br />

References<br />

1. Houshyar S, Shanks RA, Hodzic A Macromol Mater Eng. (2005) 290:45<br />

2. Bárány T, Karger-Kocsis J, Czigány T Polym Adv Technol (2006) 17:818<br />

3. H<strong>in</strong>e PJ, Ward IM, Jordan ND, Olley R, Bassett DC J Macromol Sci Phys (2001)<br />

40B:959<br />

4. Amornsakchal T, Bassett DC, Olley RH, H<strong>in</strong>e PJ, Ward IM J Appl Polym Sci (2000)<br />

78:787<br />

5. Capiati NJ, Porter RS J Mater Sci (1975) 10:1671<br />

6. Mead WT, Porter RS J Appl Polym Sci (1978) 22:3249<br />

7. Karger-Kocsis J. Patentschrift DE 10237803B4, Institut für Verbundwerkst<strong>of</strong>fe GmbH<br />

2007.<br />

8. Boiko YuM, Kovriga VV Intern J Polym Mater (1993) 22:209<br />

9. Wortmann FJ, Schulz KV Polymer (1995) 36:315<br />

10. Abraham T, Banik K, Karger-Kocsis J eXPRESS Polymer Letters (2007) 1:519<br />

11. Banik K, Abraham T, Karger-Kocsis J Macromol Mater Eng (2007) 292:1280<br />

12. Varga J J Macromol Science Part B-Physics (2002) 41: 1121<br />

13. Williams ML, Landel RF, Ferry JD J Amer Chem Soc(1955) 77: 3701<br />

14. Ferry JD Viscoelastic properties <strong>of</strong> polymers, 2nd edition, Wiley, New York, (1970) 292<br />

15. Padden FJ, Keith HD J Appl Phys (1959) 30:1479<br />

16. Samuels RJ, Yee RY J Polym Phys Ed (1972) 10:385<br />

17. Boyd RH Polymer (1985) 26:1123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!