11.12.2012 Views

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

Nondestructive testing of defects in adhesive joints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Optimization <strong>of</strong> Various Reaction Parameters<br />

Optimized reaction conditions for gett<strong>in</strong>g maximum graft<strong>in</strong>g were: MA (2.21 x 10 -3 mol L -1 );<br />

FAS-H2O2 (molar ratio), 1:4; temperature (ºC), 50; time (m<strong>in</strong>.), 90, and pH, 7.0.<br />

Characterization <strong>of</strong> Graft Copolymers<br />

FT-IR Spectra <strong>of</strong> Graft Copolymers<br />

FT-IR spectrum <strong>of</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al flax showed a broad peak at 3422.8 cm -1 which was due to bonded<br />

–OH groups and at 2918.8, 1653.5 and 1058.7 cm -1 aris<strong>in</strong>g from –CH2, C-C and C-O stretch<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

respectively. However, <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> graft copolymer, an additional peak at 1731.2 cm -1 because <strong>of</strong><br />

>C=O group <strong>of</strong> MA has been observed. This suggests that MA has been graft copolymerized onto<br />

flax fiber through covalent l<strong>in</strong>kages.<br />

Thermal Analysis (TGA/DTA)<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> TGA have been depicted <strong>in</strong> Table 1. It is shown that <strong>in</strong>itial decomposition<br />

temperature (IDT) and f<strong>in</strong>al decomposition temperature (FDT) <strong>of</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al flax were 279.9 and<br />

489.1 ºC, respectively, whereas, <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> flax-g-poly(MA), IDT and FDT were 313.7 and 478.4<br />

ºC, respectively. Flax-g-poly(MA) showed the higher IDT than flax fiber. The results <strong>of</strong> TGA<br />

have been supported by DTA studies. DTA <strong>of</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al flax fiber shows the exothermic peaks at<br />

325.3 ºC (13.8 µV) and there has been a cont<strong>in</strong>uous exothermic combustion <strong>of</strong> the sample at<br />

furnace temperature <strong>in</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> atmospheric oxygen. This peak shows the disturbance <strong>in</strong> Hbonded<br />

amorphous region. Another sharp exothermic peak has been observed at 455.3 ºC (38.9<br />

µV), which <strong>in</strong>dicates the complete break down <strong>of</strong> the crystall<strong>in</strong>e region at this temperature. In<br />

case <strong>of</strong> flax-g-poly(MA), exothermic peaks at 322.5ºC (24.6 µV) and 380.4ºC (53.1 µV) have<br />

been observed. Thermal stability <strong>of</strong> flax-g-poly(MA) is not altered very much <strong>in</strong> comparison to<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al flax. This was due to undisturbed crystall<strong>in</strong>e structure <strong>of</strong> the fiber. Thus, it has been<br />

found that there exists a direct correlation with percentage <strong>of</strong> graft<strong>in</strong>g and crystall<strong>in</strong>ity.<br />

Scann<strong>in</strong>g Electron Microscopy (SEM)<br />

A clear cut dist<strong>in</strong>ction between the scann<strong>in</strong>g electron micrographs (SEM) <strong>of</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al flax and<br />

its graft copolymer reveals that there has been a sufficient deposition <strong>of</strong> poly(MA) onto flax fiber.<br />

The scans easily verify the fact that cellulosic fibers ly<strong>in</strong>g apart <strong>in</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al flax started form<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bundles <strong>in</strong> the graft copolymers.<br />

Percentage Crystall<strong>in</strong>ity and Crystall<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>of</strong> Graft Copolymers<br />

It has been observed that percentage crystall<strong>in</strong>ity and crystall<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>of</strong> flax were decreased<br />

a little with graft<strong>in</strong>g (Table 2). There was no comparable difference <strong>in</strong> the X-ray diffraction<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> flax and flax-g-poly(MA). Percentage crystall<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> flax and flax-g-poly(MA) was<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!