31.01.2018 Views

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOCIAL IMPACT INVESTMENT: BUILDING THE EVIDENCE BASE<br />

Table 4.2. List of attributes for Beneficiary Context<br />

CHARACTERISTICS Attributes of the Characteristic Eligibility *<br />

Population<br />

at risk<br />

IN<br />

Age<br />

<strong>Social</strong> Demographics: Family type<br />

Other<br />

2. Beneficiary context<br />

Location:<br />

Underserved<br />

Developing<br />

Developed<br />

Population<br />

not at risk<br />

* Eligibility used in the OECD definition for the purpose of this report.<br />

Source: OECD.<br />

Income<br />

OUT<br />

4.21 In terms of populations at risk, family type, age (life cycle needs) and other social demographics<br />

can result in social exclusion of some people. This occurs not just because of income and wealth factors,<br />

but also due to the combination of socio-demographic risks that may result in costly social exclusion if not<br />

managed or supported properly. Therefore, identifying whether populations are at risk of social exclusion<br />

due to social demographics also helps determining whether the beneficiary context falls within the scope of<br />

SII. For the purposes of the OECD definition, SII should target populations at risk.<br />

4.22 While providing affordable housing for populations at the risk of social exclusion (or de facto<br />

socially excluded) can have a social impact (e.g., accommodation for people that live on the streets),<br />

affordable housing that targets well-off people may improve the living conditions of the beneficiaries but<br />

not necessarily address social needs such as reducing homelessness figures. In London, a social impact<br />

bond (SIB) that aims at providing accommodation for “rough sleepers” is currently in place (see Chapters<br />

3 & 7 for further detail on SIBs) and would fit within most SII definitions. 9<br />

4.2.3. Good\Service<br />

4.23 The type of the specific good or service (hereafter referred to as “good”) being provided, either<br />

pure private, pure public, or mixed, is relevant to understand whether there is a market for SII. Only the<br />

two extremes (public and private) are provided in Table 4.3 for simplification. While on one extreme, a<br />

good can be classified as “public”, on the other extreme it can be classified as a “private”. SII eligibility<br />

will apply to goods within the continuum between the two boundaries as illustrated, for example, by the<br />

dotted black lines in Figure 4.4 below.<br />

9 . Further information on the London “rough sleepers” SIB can be found at:<br />

https://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/housing-land/tackling-homelessness-overcrowding/roughsleeping/social-impact-bond-for-rough-sleepers<br />

48 © OECD 2015

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!