31.01.2018 Views

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

development in the US, or are made available to local financial institutions abroad to<br />

finance international community development. The community investing institution<br />

typically provides training and other types of support and expertise to ensure the<br />

success of the loan and its returns for investors.<br />

Community investing grew almost 5% from 2012 to 2014. Assets held and invested<br />

locally by community development financial institutions (CDFIs) based in the US totaled<br />

$64.3 billion at the start of 2014, up from $61.4 billion in 2012.<br />

<strong>Investing</strong> in Capital Markets<br />

<strong>Investing</strong> Strategies<br />

<strong>Social</strong> investors use several strategies to maximize financial return and attempt to<br />

maximize social good. These strategies seek to create change by shifting the cost of<br />

capital down for sustainable firm and up for the non-sustainable ones. The proponents<br />

argue that access to capital is what drives the future direction of development.<br />

Negative Screening<br />

Negative screening excludes certain securities from investment consideration based on<br />

social or environmental criteria. For example, many socially responsible investors<br />

screen out tobacco company investments.<br />

The longest-running SRI index, the Domini 400—now the MSCI KLD 400—was started<br />

in May 1990. It has continued to perform competitively —with average annualized total<br />

returns of 9.51% through December 2009 compared with 8.66% for the S&P 500.<br />

Despite this impressive growth, it has long been commonly perceived that SRI brings<br />

smaller returns than unrestricted investing. So-called "sin stocks", including purveyors of<br />

tobacco, alcohol, gambling and defense contractors, were banned from portfolios on<br />

moral or ethical grounds. And shutting out entire industries hurts performance, the<br />

critics said. However, in a comprehensive study, financial economists Lobe, Roithmeier,<br />

and Walkshäusl taking the position of the advocatus diaboli, answer the question<br />

whether to invest in a socially responsible way – or not? They create a set of global and<br />

domestic sin indexes consisting of 755 publicly traded socially irresponsible stocks<br />

around the world belonging to the Sextet of Sin: adult entertainment, alcohol, gambling,<br />

nuclear power, tobacco, and weapons.<br />

They compare their stock market performance directly with a set of virtue comparables<br />

consisting of the most important international socially responsible investment indexes.<br />

They find no compelling evidence that ethical and unethical screens lead to a significant<br />

difference in their financial performance, which is in contrast with the results of prior<br />

studies on sinful investing.<br />

Page 26 of 140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!