31.01.2018 Views

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Impact</strong> Investments:<br />

An emerging asset class<br />

Global Research<br />

29 November 2010<br />

technical assistance facility, which may subsidize fund costs and allow fund<br />

managers to charge market-rate fees to investors. Maintaining fee levels in line with<br />

traditional investments will help remove one potential barrier to attracting impact<br />

investment capital in the short term. However, in the long term, some impact<br />

investment fund managers may be able to justify higher fees by providing valueadded<br />

services (such as rigorous impact investment measurement)for which investors<br />

could be willing to pay.<br />

Figure 17: Management fees<br />

Histogram of survey answers.<br />

Total # of investments = 374; Total size of investments = $582m<br />

Figure 18: Carry fees<br />

Histogram of survey answers.<br />

Total # of investments = 233; Total size of investments = $254m<br />

500<br />

400<br />

Number of deals<br />

Notional, USD mm<br />

200<br />

150<br />

Number of deals<br />

Notional, USD mm<br />

300<br />

100<br />

200<br />

50<br />

100<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0-4.9% 5-9.9% 10-<br />

15-<br />

20-<br />

25-<br />

30% +<br />

0-0.9% 1-1.9% 2-2.9% 3-3.9% 4-4.9% 5-6.9%<br />

14.9%<br />

19.9%<br />

24.9%<br />

29.9%<br />

Source: GIIN, J.P. Morgan.<br />

Source: GIIN, J.P. Morgan. Carry defined as % of fund's return retained by general partners.<br />

<strong>Impact</strong> measurement systems are currently overwhelmingly proprietary<br />

Our survey also asked respondents to reveal what type of social impact measurement<br />

system they were using (if any). The choices were: a proprietary system, the system<br />

employed by the investee company or fund (the recipient of the investment funds), or<br />

a third party system. As Figure 19 illustrates, an overwhelming 85% of respondents<br />

are currently using a proprietary impact measurement system, and 13% use the<br />

investee’s system. Only 2% of impact investors currently employ a third-party<br />

system and very few reported using an investee’s system. We anticipate this profile<br />

to change as systems for measuring impact, such as IRIS, achieve broad adoption<br />

across impact investors 38 .<br />

38 For more on the IRIS metrics, see appendix.<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!