31.01.2018 Views

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

17 Love Relationship Online dating<br />

Reception<br />

It is often difficult or not possible to compare <strong>Social</strong> Earnings Ratio with other forms of<br />

financial measurement. Comparing S/E to other social impact tools is something that is<br />

more common. <strong>Social</strong> Return on Investment (SROI) is one example of this and is quite<br />

a popular search on most search engines. When its results are compared to that of<br />

S/E's, its clear that SROI has a greater amount of coverage.<br />

It could be argued that the history of SROI and the fact it was released in 2002, nine<br />

years prior to S/E, could indicate why it has a greater number of search engine results.<br />

Equally, HACT claims to "have created the largest bank of methodologically consistent<br />

and robust social values ever produced." By this they are referring to a database of<br />

financial proxy data which can be used in conjunction to SROI, although in August 2015<br />

they have criticised SROI comprehensively in the "Seven Principle Problems of SROI."<br />

Continuing with the comparison, in 2014 Lord Loomba presented a report to the House<br />

of Lords, "<strong>Social</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> Analysis", which included metrics from Business in the<br />

Community and Benefit Corporation, as well as SROI and S/E. The steep rise in S/E<br />

take-up in 2013 represents the automation of the metric and not necessarily any<br />

indication of quality. A 'big-data' approach has been provided by CSR-Hub who have<br />

harvested 417 metrics; in May 2014 they announced an MoU with CCEG to explore<br />

S/E.<br />

S/E has undergone considerable analysis and critique in recent years. Most recent<br />

comparing IIRC (International Integrated Reporting Council) to S/E, concluding<br />

"Together, the Framework and the S/E Ratio provide a powerful set of metrics and<br />

analysis for both founders and funders to evaluate value as well as strategic risk."<br />

Earlier in 2015, The Guardian wrote: "Since 2013, there has certainly been an increase<br />

in the number of online measurement tools. But the challenge of calculating social<br />

impact goes back to the early 1990s. One measure, called LM3, allows organisations to<br />

calculate the local economic impact, while another, called SROI, calculates social return<br />

on investment. But both are very complex and are based on lots of assumptions that the<br />

people who do the evaluation will have to identify, agree and sign off." Perhaps we need<br />

a simpler tool such as the social earnings ratio, which doesn’t require lots of<br />

assumptions and is based on a one-size-fits-all approach."<br />

The focus on the broad context of applications of S/E have drawn sometimes heated<br />

debate amongst the international academic and social innovation community in Italy,<br />

Romania, and Russia. Mohammad Yunus, a Nobel Prize laureate, has also spoken<br />

publicly about the framework. These discussions surrounding the concept of a 'universal<br />

metric' draw both praise and scepticism.<br />

Criticism of the timeframes to calculate the data has been made, with many wondering<br />

how accurate statistics be drawn in such a short period of time. other debates about the<br />

Page 78 of 140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!